Skip to content

Nexavar-Tarceva Combination Therapy for First Line Treatment of Patients Diagnosed With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase III Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind Trial of Sorafenib Plus Erlotinib vs. Sorafenib Plus Placebo as First Line Systemic Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00901901
Acronym
SEARCH
Enrollment
732
Registered
2009-05-14
Start date
2009-05-21
Completion date
2018-05-23
Last updated
2019-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Keywords

Sorafenib (Nexavar), Erlotinib (Tarceva), First Line, HCC

Brief summary

This is a randomized trial to evaluate the clinical benefit of sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and erlotinib 150 mg once a day versus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and placebo erlotinib once daily in subjects with unresectable advanced or metastatic Child-Pugh A HCC. Patients who are candidates for potentially curative intervention (i.e. surgical resection or local ablation) are not eligible for this study.

Detailed description

European quality of life scale (5 dimensions) (EQ-5D)

Interventions

DRUGSorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)

Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily

Erlotinib 150 mg once daily

DRUGPlacebo

Matching erlotinib placebo 150 mg once daily

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients \> 18 years of age * Patients who have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks * Patients with histological or cytologically documented HCC * Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that meets both of the following criteria: * The lesion can be accurately measured in at least one dimension according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) * The lesion has not been previously treated with local therapy * Patients who have an ECOG PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status) of 0 or 1 * Cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A. * Patients who give written informed consent prior to any study specific screening procedures with the understanding that the patient has the right to withdraw from the study at any time.

Exclusion criteria

* History of cardiac disease: congestive heart failure \> New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2; active coronary artery disease (CAD); cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy other than beta blockers or digoxin), or uncontrolled hypertension. Myocardial infarction more than 6 months prior to study entry is permitted. * Abnormalities of the cornea based on history (e.g. dry eye syndrome, Sogren's syndrome) including congenital abnormality (e.g. Fuch's dystrophy), abnormal slit-lamp examination using a vital dye (e.g. fluorescein, Bengal-Rose), and/or an abnormal corneal sensitivity test (Schirmer test or similar tear production test). * History of interstitial lung disease (ILD). * Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry. * Previous treatment with yttrium-90 spheres * Any condition that is unstable or which could jeopardize the safety of the patient and his/her compliance in the study. * Uncontrolled ascites (defined as not easily controlled with diuretic treatment)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization of the first patient until 34 months or date of death of any cause whichever came firstOverall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease ControlFrom randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeksDisease control was defined as the number of participants who had a best response rating of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that was confirmed at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating. CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of target and non-target tumors. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD: steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage for PR nor sufficient increase for PD.
Time to Radiological Tumor Progression (TTP)From randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeksTTP was the time from randomization to radiological tumor progression. Participants without radiological tumor progression at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Progressive disease (PD) was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.0), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Appearance of new lesions also constituted PD.
Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - IndexThe EQ-5D was administered at the beginning of the visit prior to seeing the investigator. Questionnaires were to be completed every 6 weeks (Day 1 of each cycle) for subsequent cycles and at the end of treatment visit.The European quality of life scale (5 dimensions) (EQ-5D) questionnaire was given to the participants at each visit. The EQ-5D questionnaire consisted of 5 ordinal categorical responses (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). The scores for the EQ-5D dimensions are assigned according to the level of problems reported (1 'no problems'; 2 'some problems'; 3 'extreme problems'). The 5 health dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D index score has a range of 0 and 1 with 0 representing death and 1 representing perfect health.
Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VASThe EQ-5D VAS was administered at the beginning of the visit prior to seeing the investigator. Questionnaires were to be completed every 6 weeks (Day 1 of each cycle) for subsequent cycles and at the end of treatment visit.Participants indicated on a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best) how good or bad their health state was on that particular day.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor ResponseFrom randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeksTumor response was the proportion of participants with the best tumor response (ie, achieving either a confirmed complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\], according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] criteria).
Time to ResponseFrom randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeksTime to response was the number of days from randomization to the date the CR or PR was documented (with confirmation) (Note: the relevant date is that of the first documentation, not the confirmation date).
Duration of ResponseFrom randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeksDuration of response - RECIST: number of days from the date that CR or PR is first documented to date that PD is first objectively documented or to death before progression. Note: the relevant date is that of the first documentation, not the confirmation date (if participant progressed or died then censored=no) or to last observation if participant did not progress or die then censored=yes note: this last observation date should be the same as that used for time to progression.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Peru, Poland, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 128 study centers in 26 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, and Asia.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 962 screened participants, 242 were screen failures and were excluded from participated in the study. A total of 720 participants were randomized to study arms: 358 participants in the sorafenib + placebo group and 362 participants in the sorafenib + erlotinib group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (bid) and erlotinib 150 mg tablet once daily (qd)
362
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Placebo
Participants received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (bid) and matching erlotinib placebo 150 mg tablet once daily (qd)
358
Total720

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow-up PeriodDeath181208
Follow-up PeriodLost to Follow-up128
Follow-up PeriodMissing9480
Follow-up PeriodProtocol driven decision point4736
Follow-up PeriodWithdrawal by Subject69
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event120128
Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up35
Treatment PeriodMissing10
Treatment PeriodNever treated03
Treatment PeriodNoncompliance with study medication41
Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision22
Treatment PeriodProtocol driven decision point02
Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation59
Treatment PeriodStudy terminated by sponsor20
Treatment PeriodSwitch to commercial drug11
Treatment PeriodTransfer to treatment continuation study52
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject2624

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous60.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
59.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
59.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
ECOG stratification group
0
222 Participants216 Participants438 Participants
ECOG stratification group
1
140 Participants142 Participants282 Participants
Extrahepatic spread
No
157 Participants139 Participants296 Participants
Extrahepatic spread
Yes
205 Participants219 Participants424 Participants
Macroscopic vascular invasion
No
224 Participants205 Participants429 Participants
Macroscopic vascular invasion
Yes
138 Participants153 Participants291 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
67 Participants72 Participants139 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
295 Participants286 Participants581 Participants
Smoking status
current smoker
118 Participants123 Participants241 Participants
Smoking status
former smoker
132 Participants128 Participants260 Participants
Smoking status
non-smoker
112 Participants107 Participants219 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
353 / 362349 / 355
serious
Total, serious adverse events
214 / 362198 / 355

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause.

Time frame: From randomization of the first patient until 34 months or date of death of any cause whichever came first

Population: The full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Overall Survival289 Days
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboOverall Survival259 Days
Secondary

Disease Control

Disease control was defined as the number of participants who had a best response rating of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that was confirmed at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating. CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of target and non-target tumors. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD: steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage for PR nor sufficient increase for PD.

Time frame: From randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeks

Population: The full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Disease Control159 Participants
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboDisease Control188 Participants
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Index

The European quality of life scale (5 dimensions) (EQ-5D) questionnaire was given to the participants at each visit. The EQ-5D questionnaire consisted of 5 ordinal categorical responses (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). The scores for the EQ-5D dimensions are assigned according to the level of problems reported (1 'no problems'; 2 'some problems'; 3 'extreme problems'). The 5 health dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D index score has a range of 0 and 1 with 0 representing death and 1 representing perfect health.

Time frame: The EQ-5D was administered at the beginning of the visit prior to seeing the investigator. Questionnaires were to be completed every 6 weeks (Day 1 of each cycle) for subsequent cycles and at the end of treatment visit.

Population: The full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle20.753 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle40.704 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle10.777 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle50.679 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle30.728 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle60.654 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle30.724 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle10.774 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle20.749 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle60.651 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle40.700 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - Indexcycle50.675 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAS

Participants indicated on a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best) how good or bad their health state was on that particular day.

Time frame: The EQ-5D VAS was administered at the beginning of the visit prior to seeing the investigator. Questionnaires were to be completed every 6 weeks (Day 1 of each cycle) for subsequent cycles and at the end of treatment visit.

Population: The full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle174.397 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle272.649 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle370.900 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle469.151 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle567.402 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Health-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle665.653 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle567.660 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle174.656 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle469.409 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle272.907 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle665.911 Scores on a scale
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboHealth-related Quality of Life and Utility Values as Measured by EQ-5D - VAScycle371.158 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Time to Radiological Tumor Progression (TTP)

TTP was the time from randomization to radiological tumor progression. Participants without radiological tumor progression at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Progressive disease (PD) was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.0), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Appearance of new lesions also constituted PD.

Time frame: From randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeks

Population: The full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Time to Radiological Tumor Progression (TTP)97 Days
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboTime to Radiological Tumor Progression (TTP)122 Days
Other Pre-specified

Duration of Response

Duration of response - RECIST: number of days from the date that CR or PR is first documented to date that PD is first objectively documented or to death before progression. Note: the relevant date is that of the first documentation, not the confirmation date (if participant progressed or died then censored=no) or to last observation if participant did not progress or die then censored=yes note: this last observation date should be the same as that used for time to progression.

Time frame: From randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeks

Population: The full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all randomized participants. Duration of response was evaluated in the 14 participants in the sorafenib + placebo group and 24 participants in the sorafenib + erlotinib group who achieved their confirmed best response as CR or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Duration of Response297 Days
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboDuration of Response168 Days
Other Pre-specified

Time to Response

Time to response was the number of days from randomization to the date the CR or PR was documented (with confirmation) (Note: the relevant date is that of the first documentation, not the confirmation date).

Time frame: From randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeks

Population: The full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all randomized participants. Time to response was evaluated in the 14 participants in the sorafenib + placebo group and 24 participants in the sorafenib + erlotinib group who achieved their confirmed best response as CR or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Time to Response84.5 Days
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboTime to Response83.5 Days
Other Pre-specified

Tumor Response

Tumor response was the proportion of participants with the best tumor response (ie, achieving either a confirmed complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\], according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] criteria).

Time frame: From randomization of the first participant until 34 months later (cut-off date), assessed every 6 weeks

Population: The full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Erlotinib (Tarceva)Tumor Response24 Participants
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + PlaceboTumor Response14 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026