Skip to content

Autotitrating Versus Standard Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) in Newly Diagnosed Patients

Autotitrating Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) Versus Standard NIV; a Randomised Crossover Trial in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Hypoventilation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00901485
Enrollment
23
Registered
2009-05-13
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2021-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chest Wall Disorder, Neuromuscular Disease, Nocturnal Hypoventilation

Keywords

Respiratory insufficiency, Hypercapnia, Hypoventilation, Sleep, Polysomnography, Hypoxia, Titration, Non Invasive Ventilation

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of autotitrating non-invasive ventilation (NIV) versus standard NIV in patients with newly diagnosed nocturnal hypoventilation who have never experienced nocturnal, home NIV.

Detailed description

The aim of the study is to compare the effect of two types of noninvasive ventilator (a small machine that assists breathing) in patients newly diagnosed with nocturnal hypoventilation who are inexperienced in the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV). NIV is standard therapy for patients with nocturnal hypoventilation. The most common type of NIV is bilevel pressure support which assists patient breathing by delivering different levels of air pressure during inspiration and expiration via a mask covering the nose or nose and mouth. Standard bilevel NIV (VPAP™) has been further developed to create a new automatically adjusting NIV (AutoVPAP™). Automatically adjusting NIV varies the inspiratory air pressure according to the airflow rates generated by the patient. This may improve patient comfort, hours of NIV use and recovery time. Patients over the age of 18 referred to, or under follow up at, the Royal Brompton Hospital who require domiciliary NIV but are inexperienced with use of NIV will be considered for entry into this randomised crossover study. If eligible for inclusion and willing to take part patients will be setup on automatically adjusting NIV or standard NIV, assigned in random order. At the end of one month the patient will be swapped to the alternative NIV for a further one month of domiciliary NIV treatment. At the end of each one month treatment period the patient will undergo overnight polysomnography, transcutaneous CO2 monitoring and 24 hour Holter monitoring.

Interventions

DEVICEAutoVPAP

Automatically titrated non-invasive ventilator, with target gross alveolar ventilation and back up respiratory rate determined by learn function. Nocturnal use for one month in patient's home.

DEVICEVPAPIIIST-A

Standard non-invasive ventilator with pressure and respiratory rate settings determined by healthcare professional. Nocturnal use for one month in the patient's home.

Sponsors

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
ResMed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* new clinical diagnosis of nocturnal hypoventilation * requirement for long-term domiciliary non-invasive ventilation * no previous experience with domiciliary non-invasive ventilation

Exclusion criteria

* uncontrolled cardiac failure * acute exacerbation of respiratory failure * daytime resting PaO2 \< 7.5kPa * moderate or severe bulbar weakness * inability to understand rationale and/or consent form for study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overnight Mean Oxygen Saturation4 weeksOvernight oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous capnography (PtcCO2) (TOSCA, Linde Medical Sensors, Switzerland) were performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overnight Mean Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide4 weeksOvernight oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous capnography (PtcCO2) (TOSCA, Linde Medical Sensors, Switzerland) were performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy.
Overnight Peak Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide4 weeksOvernight oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous capnography (PtcCO2) (TOSCA, Linde Medical Sensors, Switzerland) were performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy.
Oxygen Desaturation Index (>4%)4 weeksOvernight oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous capnography (PtcCO2) (TOSCA, Linde Medical Sensors, Switzerland) were performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy. ODI is the number of events per hour that SaO2 drops by \>4%.
Sleep Quality: Arousal Index4 weeksA full PSG was performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy. Standard polysomnography analysis was performed by two team members blinded to patient identity and ventilator mode (REP/JJ). Sleep quality was assessed by the Arousal Index (no of arousals/hour)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Ventilator Tolerance: Comfort of Breath Delivered4 weeksSubjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)
Subjective Ventilator Tolerance: Ease of Falling Asleep4 weeksSubjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)
Ventilator Adherence4 weeksSummary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).
Subjective Ventilator Tolerance: Liked Using Ventilator4 weeksSubjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)
Ventilator Mode Preference4 weeksSubjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)
Subjective Ventilation Tolerance: Ease of Use of Ventilator4 weeksSubjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)
Median Overnight Minute Ventilation4 weeksSummary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).
Median Overnight Pressure Support4 weeksSummary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).
Median Overnight Tidal Volume4 weeksSummary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).
Median Overnight Respiratory Rated4 weeksSummary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Patients
Patients underwent a cross over study design. In a randomised order they used 1 month of domiciliary nocturnal autotitrating, intelligent volume assured pressure support (iVAPS) non-invasive ventilation, and one month of standard non-invasive ventilation
23
Total23

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Patients
Age, Continuous54 years
FEV1 (forced expiratory volume) (L)1.5 L
FEV1/FVC0.75 ratio
FVC (forced vital capacity)1.9 L
maximal inspiratory effort (MIP) (cmH2O)50 cmH2O
Maximum expiratory pressure (MEP)118 cmH2O
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants
sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP)39 cmH2O

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 230 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Overnight Mean Oxygen Saturation

Overnight oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous capnography (PtcCO2) (TOSCA, Linde Medical Sensors, Switzerland) were performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVOvernight Mean Oxygen Saturation96 % SaO2
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationOvernight Mean Oxygen Saturation96 % SaO2
Comparison: We tested the hypothesis that iVAPS can ventilate a patient naive to NIV at least as effectively as standard PS.~Sleep and breathing parameters at the end of each treatment period were compared using Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. The median difference between treatments with 95% confidence intervals was then compared by related-samples Hodges-Lehman testp-value: 0.1395% CI: [-0.2, 1]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Overnight Mean Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide

Overnight oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous capnography (PtcCO2) (TOSCA, Linde Medical Sensors, Switzerland) were performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: All patients had a sleep study after 1 month of each mode of ventilation and all results are included in this analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVOvernight Mean Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide6.5 kPa
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationOvernight Mean Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide6.2 kPa
Comparison: Hypothesis: that we tested the hypothesis that iVAPS, with automated selection of ventilator settings, was non-inferior to standard pressure support (PS) ventilation, with settings determined by an experienced healthcare professional, for controlling nocturnal hypoventilation in patients naïve to NIV.p-value: 0.5495% CI: [-0.3, 0.4]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Overnight Peak Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide

Overnight oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous capnography (PtcCO2) (TOSCA, Linde Medical Sensors, Switzerland) were performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: All patients had a sleep study after 1 month of each mode of ventilation and all results are included in this analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVOvernight Peak Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide7.1 kPa
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationOvernight Peak Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide6.9 kPa
p-value: 0.9495% CI: [-0.5, 0.5]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Oxygen Desaturation Index (>4%)

Overnight oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous capnography (PtcCO2) (TOSCA, Linde Medical Sensors, Switzerland) were performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy. ODI is the number of events per hour that SaO2 drops by \>4%.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: All patients had a sleep study after 1 month of each mode of ventilation and all results are included in this analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVOxygen Desaturation Index (>4%)2.5 events/hr
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationOxygen Desaturation Index (>4%)5.0 events/hr
p-value: 0.4295% CI: [-2, 1]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Sleep Quality: Arousal Index

A full PSG was performed during a sleep a on NIV at the end of each month's NIV therapy. Standard polysomnography analysis was performed by two team members blinded to patient identity and ventilator mode (REP/JJ). Sleep quality was assessed by the Arousal Index (no of arousals/hour)

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 16 patients had comparative PSG data with all signals present for their sleep studies on both ventilator modes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVSleep Quality: Arousal Index17 events/hour
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationSleep Quality: Arousal Index14 events/hour
p-value: 0.8295% CI: [-8, 4]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Median Overnight Minute Ventilation

Summary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 2 patients had missing values from one of the ventilator modes, thus were excluded from the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVMedian Overnight Minute Ventilation6.8 L/min
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationMedian Overnight Minute Ventilation6.2 L/min
p-value: 0.595% CI: [-1.2, 0.5]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Median Overnight Pressure Support

Summary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 2 patients had missing data from one of the ventialtory modes and were excluded from the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVMedian Overnight Pressure Support8.3 cmH2O
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationMedian Overnight Pressure Support10.0 cmH2O
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-4.5, 0.3]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Median Overnight Respiratory Rated

Summary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 2 patients had missing data from one ventilatory mode and thus were excluded from analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVMedian Overnight Respiratory Rated16.7 bpm
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationMedian Overnight Respiratory Rated15.5 bpm
p-value: 0.4195% CI: [-0.7, 2.2]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Median Overnight Tidal Volume

Summary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 2 patients had missing data from one of the ventilatory modes and so were excluded

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVMedian Overnight Tidal Volume421 ml
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationMedian Overnight Tidal Volume400 ml
p-value: 0.4795% CI: [-54, 23]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Ventilation Tolerance: Ease of Use of Ventilator

Subjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 2 patients had missing data and were thus excluded from analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVSubjective Ventilation Tolerance: Ease of Use of Ventilator90 units on a scale
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationSubjective Ventilation Tolerance: Ease of Use of Ventilator86 units on a scale
p-value: 0.5995% CI: [-5, 14]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Ventilator Tolerance: Comfort of Breath Delivered

Subjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 2 patients had missing data and thus were excluded from analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVSubjective Ventilator Tolerance: Comfort of Breath Delivered73 units on a scale
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationSubjective Ventilator Tolerance: Comfort of Breath Delivered72 units on a scale
p-value: 0.3695% CI: [-5, 12]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Ventilator Tolerance: Ease of Falling Asleep

Subjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 2 patients had missing data and so were excluded from analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVSubjective Ventilator Tolerance: Ease of Falling Asleep86 units on a scale
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationSubjective Ventilator Tolerance: Ease of Falling Asleep79 units on a scale
p-value: 0.5995% CI: [-5, 14]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Ventilator Tolerance: Liked Using Ventilator

Subjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 2 patients had missing data, thus were excluded from analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVSubjective Ventilator Tolerance: Liked Using Ventilator81 units on a scale
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationSubjective Ventilator Tolerance: Liked Using Ventilator68 units on a scale
p-value: 0.7295% CI: [-9, 5]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Ventilator Adherence

Summary data from the ventilators were downloaded after each month's therapy, including adherence (hours of use), and ventilator output (nightly mean pressure support, minute ventilation (MV), RR and leak).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: 1 participant had missing adherence data and so was excluded from this analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Autotitrating iVAPS NIVVentilator Adherence5.40 hh:mm/day
Standard Non-invasive PS VentilationVentilator Adherence4.20 hh:mm/day
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [0.27, 1.44]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Ventilator Mode Preference

Subjective tolerance of ventilator modes was assessed by 10cm visual analogue scales (VAS) in response to questions on comfort of breath, ease of falling asleep, use of ventilator, and mode preference. VAS was scored from 0-100 for each question (0 - negative and 100 -s positive)

Time frame: 4 weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026