Skip to content

Straumann Bone Ceramic Versus BioOss in Sinus Elevation

Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study to Compare Bone Formation Around Micro-implants in the Maxilla After Sinus Floor Augmentation With Straumann Bone Ceramic or Bio-Oss in a Split Mouth Design

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00900822
Enrollment
11
Registered
2009-05-13
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2016-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Alveolar Bone Loss

Keywords

bone grafting, sinus elevation, sinus augmentation

Brief summary

Straumann Bone Ceramic (SBC) and BioOss will be used as bone grafting materials when there is a need for bone augmentation in the posterior upper jaw. 9 months later the bone formation is evaluated. The patients are followed for 3 years.The study hypothesis is that the SBC is not worse than BioOss.

Detailed description

Straumann Bone Ceramic (SBC) and BioOss will be used as bone grafting materials when there is a need for bone augmentation in the posterior upper jaw. The bone grafting materials will be placed into the sinus cavity,(a routine procedure), one material randomly at each side and a micro-implant will be inserted simultaneously. 9 months later the micro-implant is removed and a regular Straumann SLActive implant is inserted. The micro-implant is evaluated histologically. The site is evaluated every 12 months for 3 years in regards to clinical measurements. The study hypothesis is that the SBC is not worse than BioOss. Study design: Prospective, randomized, open, controlled, single center, split mouth Study population: 11 male and female patients at an age of between 18 and 80 years, affected by edentulism of both lateral-posterior maxilla and presenting two pneumatized maxillary sinuses and necessitating rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses will be recruited in the study and treated by means of maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed implant placement.

Interventions

Granules applied once during surgery

DEVICEBioOss

Granules that are applied once during surgery

Sponsors

Institut Straumann AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females, 18 years to 80 years of age * The patients are at least partly edentulous in the both maxillary regions corresponding to the sinuses. * A dental implant procedure is foreseen in both maxilla regions corresponding to maxillary sinuses. * Patients must be expected to present a bilateral bone defect in the sinus area, which both need a sinus floor augmentation to place one or more dental implants each. * Residual alveolar crest height of the lateral-posterior segments of the edentulous maxilla below the floor of each of the maxillary sinuses shall be * less than 5 mm and at least 2 mm, as measured by Scanora - tomography Scans in the deepest floor of the sinus * residual alveolar crest width should be at least in average more than 4mm as measured by Scanora - tomography scans * Patients must be committed to the study and must sign informed consent. * Oral hygiene Index less than 25%

Exclusion criteria

* Any systemic medical condition that could interfere with the surgical procedure or planned treatment * Current pregnancy at the time of recruitment * Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene * Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse causing systemic compromize * Patients who smoke more than 10 cigarettes per day * Medication which interferes with bone formation * Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which could represent a general contra-indication for surgical procedure or would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability * Mucosal diseases such as erosive lichen planus * History of local radiation therapy * Presence of oral lesions (such as ulceration, malignancy) * Severe bruxing or clenching habits * Persistent intraoral infection * Previous GBR (bone graft) or dental implant treatment in the posterior segments of the upper maxilla (foreseen implant site) * Patients presenting clinical and radiological signs and symptoms of maxillary sinus disease * Existing teeth in the residual dentition with untreated endodontic problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histologically Measured Bone to Implant Contact (BIC)9 months after implant placementResults from morphometric measurements of percentage of new bone in contact with the total surface of the titanium implant, area of new bone and bone graft particles in contact with bone

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implant Survival Rate12 months after loading the implantThe percentage of implants remaining in the jaw.
Implant Success Rate12 months after loading the implantImplant success is defined as the absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings, absence of implant mobility, absence of a recurrent per-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more 3-month follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics), and bone level changes around the implant less than 1 mm during the first year of loading and less than 0.2 mm per year thereafter.

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment started Oct 2005 and was completed June 2006.

Pre-assignment details

Split-mouth design (test and control in the same patient).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Straumann Bone Ceramic
Synthetic bone graft material
11
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStraumann Bone Ceramic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
Age, Continuous65.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.06
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 114 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Histologically Measured Bone to Implant Contact (BIC)

Results from morphometric measurements of percentage of new bone in contact with the total surface of the titanium implant, area of new bone and bone graft particles in contact with bone

Time frame: 9 months after implant placement

Population: This was a split-mouth design. Each patient received both treatments. There was one sample in the Straumann BoneCeramic group that could not be analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Straumann Bone CeramicHistologically Measured Bone to Implant Contact (BIC)64.552 percentage of total surfaceStandard Deviation 9.036
BioOssHistologically Measured Bone to Implant Contact (BIC)54.904 percentage of total surfaceStandard Deviation 15.995
Secondary

Implant Success Rate

Implant success is defined as the absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings, absence of implant mobility, absence of a recurrent per-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more 3-month follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics), and bone level changes around the implant less than 1 mm during the first year of loading and less than 0.2 mm per year thereafter.

Time frame: 12 months after loading the implant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Straumann Bone CeramicImplant Success Rate93.6 percentage of implants
BioOssImplant Success Rate96.8 percentage of implants
Secondary

Implant Survival Rate

The percentage of implants remaining in the jaw.

Time frame: 12 months after loading the implant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Straumann Bone CeramicImplant Survival Rate96.7 percentage of implants
BioOssImplant Survival Rate96.7 percentage of implants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026