Skip to content

Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Joint Instability in Patients With Severe Pelvic Girdle Pain After Pregnancy and Trauma

Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Joint Instability in Patients With Severe Pelvic Girdle Pain After Pregnancy and Trauma - A Study to Measure Effect of Surgery, Analysis of Clinical Tests and Detection of Sacroiliac Instability Using RSA.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00900601
Enrollment
9
Registered
2009-05-13
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2018-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Joint Instability, Pelvic Pain

Keywords

Sacroiliac pain, Sacroiliac instability, Pelvic girdle pain, Sacroiliac arthrodesis, Arthrodesis, Surgery

Brief summary

Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) related to pregnancy is a common reason to sick leave during pregnancy. Low back pain and PGP affects about 50% of women during pregnancy. Most of the women recover, however about 10% of the women still have complaints after birth. Most patients have positive effect from conservative treatment, but unfortunately some do still have much pain despite intensive conservative rehabilitation. Surgery has been tried on these women with various results. Surgical treatment is controversial and there is a lack of documentation. The investigators will operate 20 patients with arthrodesis to the sacroiliac joint and symphysis. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) will be used to evaluate the joint movement in different part of the process. Hypothesis: Severe pelvic girdle pain is caused by pelvic joint instability in some cases and surgically fixation of the affected joints can help these women to get back to a normal life.

Interventions

PROCEDUREArthrodesis to the sacroiliac joint and symphysis

Standard surgical procedures will be used. When the patient has isolated pain in the symphysis isolated fixation will be performed. A 2x2 cm large bone block will be removed and replaced with spongy bone. For fixation the Matta-plate will be applied. To the sacroiliac joint we use an anterior approach. A 2x1,5 cm large bone block will be removed and replaced with spongy bone from the iliac crest. For joint fixation we either use 2 plates or sacroiliac screws. The same procedure will be used on the other side in the cases with bilateral symptoms. Only one side will be operated at a time. After one year it will be decided if it's necessary to perform contralateral surgery.

Sponsors

Stiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering
CollaboratorOTHER
Oslo University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pain in one or more pelvic joints. * Minimum 2 positive clinical tests. * High pain and disability score * Tried adequate physiotherapy without effect.

Exclusion criteria

* Known psychiatric diagnosis * Other spine pathology * CT verified ankylosis * BMI\>30

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)12 monthsOswestry Disability Index is a 10 item questionnaire comprises 10 questions about physical function. Each item has a 0-5 scale and the raw score is multiplied by 2 and the sum is the total score. Zero represents excellent physical function and 100 is more or less bedridden. This is the most used outcome measure in low back pain studies.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 to 1012 monthsVisual Analogue Scale is a 0 -10 scale. Zero is no pain and 10 is the worst pain you can imagine. In this study the patients were asked to report the morgning and evening pain by this scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Healing Measured by CT12 monthsNumber of participants with healing as measured by CT data. The outcome was radiological healing vs no signs of radiological healing. In order to be classified as healed the CT scans had to show Clear signs of bone bridging across the sacroiliac joint.

Countries

Norway

Participant flow

Recruitment details

During the study period, from 2007 and 2010, a total of 20 patients with PGP were referred Oslo University Hospital, but only 9 patients met the study's inclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sacroliac Joint Fusion
Patients treated with sacroiliac joint fusion
9
Total9

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSacroliac Joint Fusion
Age, Continuous40 years
BMI25 kg/m2
Duration of pain11 years
Etiology
Post preganancy
7 Participants
Etiology
Trauma
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
9 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
Unilateral/Bilateral
Bilateral pain
8 Participants
Unilateral/Bilateral
Unilateral pain
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Oswestry Disability Index is a 10 item questionnaire comprises 10 questions about physical function. Each item has a 0-5 scale and the raw score is multiplied by 2 and the sum is the total score. Zero represents excellent physical function and 100 is more or less bedridden. This is the most used outcome measure in low back pain studies.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Sacroliac Joint FusionOswestry Disability Index (ODI)Baseline54 units on a scale
Sacroliac Joint FusionOswestry Disability Index (ODI)One year37 units on a scale
Primary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 to 10

Visual Analogue Scale is a 0 -10 scale. Zero is no pain and 10 is the worst pain you can imagine. In this study the patients were asked to report the morgning and evening pain by this scale.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Sacroliac Joint FusionVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 to 10Baseline81 units on a scale
Sacroliac Joint FusionVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 to 10One year57 units on a scale
Secondary

Healing Measured by CT

Number of participants with healing as measured by CT data. The outcome was radiological healing vs no signs of radiological healing. In order to be classified as healed the CT scans had to show Clear signs of bone bridging across the sacroiliac joint.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sacroliac Joint FusionHealing Measured by CT8 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026