Skip to content

Occlusal Adjustment as Treatment for Chronic Orofacial Pain

Basis for an Etiological Diagnosis and Treatment of the Chronic TMD-pain: RCT Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00899717
Enrollment
21
Registered
2009-05-12
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2013-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Orofacial Pain

Keywords

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (TMD), Orofacial pain, Limited mouth opening, Craniomandibular dysfunction syndrome, Axiography, Gnatography, Preferred chewing side, Occlusal adjustment, Selective grinding, Handedness, Bruxism, TMD, Costen's Syndrome, Myofascial pain, TMD treatment, Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether occlusal adjustment by selective grinding and/or occlusal addition is an effective treatment of chronic temporomandibular joint disorders.

Detailed description

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are very common disorders in daily dentistry and oral and maxillofacial practice. The key symptoms are jaw joint pain and limited mouth opening. Other than trauma, the causes remain unknown; consequently, there are no treatments based on specific etiologies. In our experience, patients can usually receive beneficial occlusal adjustments if these are carefully planned and performed in two steps: (1) elimination of premature contacts, which reduces loads in the temporomandibular joints, and (2) individualized remodeling of lateral anterior guidance to facilitate unilateral alternate chewing. The study will use stratified blocking randomization to blindly assign patients to the real or placebo treatment groups in order to evaluate the null hypothesis (H0) that Occlusal adjustment of sufficient quality has no effect on chronic pain and/or limited mouth opening in TMD patients.

Interventions

modification of occlusal surfaces

Simulated modification of occlusal surfaces

Sponsors

University of Santiago de Compostela
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* People suitable for inclusion in the study are full dentate patients * Aged between 18 and 65 years * Patients with chronic TMD pain (and usually with associated limited mouth opening) for whom occlusal adjustment could achieve normal occlusion, both static and functionally equilibrated

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Trauma * Previous TMJ surgery * Patient refusal to consent to participate in the study or significant concerns about the study * Limited collaboration * Concurrent active treatment with orthodontics, and active periodontal disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)Baseline, immediately after therapy, 3 months and 6 months after therapyThe primary outcome was self-reported pain intensity on a 0 to 10 cm visual analog scale considering the temporomandibular disorder side, being 0=No pain and 10=Worst imaginable pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R®)Before and 6 months after therapyScale name: Global Severity Index. Scale graded from 0 to 4. Scores increases as the symptoms severity increases.
Preferred Chewing SideBefore and 6 months after therapyThe change in the habitual chewing side of each participant across the study
Maximum Mouth Opening (mm)6 months (before and after therapy) including 4 assessment points: pre-treatment, post-treatment, 3- and 6-month follow upMaximum voluntary unassisted mouth opening
Condylar Path AnglesBaselineParasagittal plane condylar path angles tracings in relation to the Frankfort line were made following the Gysi extraoral method.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Real Occlusal Adjustment10
Sham Occlusal Adjustment11
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham Occlusal AdjustmentReal Occlusal AdjustmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants
Age Continuous29.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.61
34.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
32.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.34
Region of Enrollment
Spain
11 participants10 participants21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)

The primary outcome was self-reported pain intensity on a 0 to 10 cm visual analog scale considering the temporomandibular disorder side, being 0=No pain and 10=Worst imaginable pain

Time frame: Baseline, immediately after therapy, 3 months and 6 months after therapy

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real Occlusal AdjustmentVisual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)Baseline6.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Real Occlusal AdjustmentVisual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)Immediately after therapy.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Real Occlusal AdjustmentVisual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)3 months after therapy2.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Real Occlusal AdjustmentVisual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)6 months after therapy.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentVisual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)6 months after therapy4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentVisual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)Baseline4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentVisual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)3 months after therapy3.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentVisual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10)Immediately after therapy2.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Secondary

Condylar Path Angles

Parasagittal plane condylar path angles tracings in relation to the Frankfort line were made following the Gysi extraoral method.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real Occlusal AdjustmentCondylar Path AnglesRight condylar path angle52.33 degreesStandard Deviation 10.28
Real Occlusal AdjustmentCondylar Path AnglesLeft condylar path angle49.20 degreesStandard Deviation 11.68
Real Occlusal AdjustmentCondylar Path AnglesPain side condylar path angle56.75 degreesStandard Deviation 12.62
Real Occlusal AdjustmentCondylar Path AnglesNon-pain side condylar path angle44.78 degreesStandard Deviation 6.87
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentCondylar Path AnglesNon-pain side condylar path angle46.18 degreesStandard Deviation 8.36
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentCondylar Path AnglesRight condylar path angle49 degreesStandard Deviation 8.09
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentCondylar Path AnglesPain side condylar path angle51.09 degreesStandard Deviation 9.31
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentCondylar Path AnglesLeft condylar path angle48.27 degreesStandard Deviation 10.21
Secondary

Maximum Mouth Opening (mm)

Maximum voluntary unassisted mouth opening

Time frame: 6 months (before and after therapy) including 4 assessment points: pre-treatment, post-treatment, 3- and 6-month follow up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real Occlusal AdjustmentMaximum Mouth Opening (mm)Baseline41.6 mmStandard Deviation 8.26
Real Occlusal AdjustmentMaximum Mouth Opening (mm)Immediately after therapy45.50 mmStandard Deviation 7.89
Real Occlusal AdjustmentMaximum Mouth Opening (mm)3 months after therapy47.10 mmStandard Deviation 5.26
Real Occlusal AdjustmentMaximum Mouth Opening (mm)6 months after therapy49.20 mmStandard Deviation 7.28
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentMaximum Mouth Opening (mm)6 months after therapy41.73 mmStandard Deviation 10.34
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentMaximum Mouth Opening (mm)Baseline42.36 mmStandard Deviation 10.55
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentMaximum Mouth Opening (mm)3 months after therapy41.27 mmStandard Deviation 11.31
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentMaximum Mouth Opening (mm)Immediately after therapy45.07 mmStandard Deviation 10.61
Secondary

Preferred Chewing Side

The change in the habitual chewing side of each participant across the study

Time frame: Before and 6 months after therapy

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Real Occlusal AdjustmentPreferred Chewing SideBaseline0 participants
Real Occlusal AdjustmentPreferred Chewing Side6 months after therapy8 participants
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentPreferred Chewing SideBaseline0 participants
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentPreferred Chewing Side6 months after therapy1 participants
Secondary

Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R®)

Scale name: Global Severity Index. Scale graded from 0 to 4. Scores increases as the symptoms severity increases.

Time frame: Before and 6 months after therapy

Population: Only tests from 15 participants were suitable because of slow or too many positive responses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real Occlusal AdjustmentSymptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R®)Baseline Global Severity Index1.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Real Occlusal AdjustmentSymptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R®)6 months after therapy Global Severity Index0.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentSymptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R®)Baseline Global Severity Index0.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Placebo Occlusal AdjustmentSymptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R®)6 months after therapy Global Severity Index0.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026