Skip to content

Citalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease

A Multi-Center Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Study of Citalopram for the Treatment of Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00898807
Acronym
CitAD
Enrollment
186
Registered
2009-05-12
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2014-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Agitation, Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

neuropsychiatric symptoms, aggression, mood lability

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of citalopram for agitation in Alzheimer's dementia.

Detailed description

This study is designed to examine the efficacy and safety of citalopram as treatment for clinically significant agitation in Alzheimer's dementia (AD) patients. It will also investigate pharmacogenomic, genetic, and clinical predictors of response to citalopram therapy. The management of agitation is a major priority in treating patients with AD. Non-pharmacologic options have limited effectiveness. Several pharmacologic options have been explored, but findings for anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, and cholinesterase inhibitors are disappointing or associated with questionable risk-benefit ratio. Better pharmacologic options are needed. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) show promise as a treatment for agitation in AD, based on evidence of a link between agitation and brain serotonin system abnormalities in AD patients, and on preliminary clinical data from a single-site, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which citalopram was superior to perphenazine and placebo.

Interventions

DRUGcitalopram

target dose 30mg daily for 9 weeks

DRUGplacebo

daily for 9 weeks

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Probable Alzheimer's disease (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria), with Mini-Mental score of 5-28 inclusive * A medication for agitation is appropriate, in the opinion of the study physician * Clinically significant agitation for which either 1. the frequency of agitation as assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is 'Very frequently', or 2. the frequency of agitation as assessed by the NPI is 'Frequently' AND the severity of the agitation as assessed by the NPI is 'Moderate', or 'Marked' * Provision of informed consent for participation in the study by patient or surrogate (if necessary) and caregiver * Availability of primary caregiver, who spends several hours a week with the patient and supervises his/her care, to accompany the patient to study visits and to participate in the study * No change to Alzheimer's disease (AD) medications within the month preceding randomization, including starting, stopping, or dosage modifications

Exclusion criteria

* Meets criteria for Major Depressive Episode by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV (TR)) criteria * Presence of a brain disease that might otherwise explain the presence of dementia, such as extensive brain vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, traumatic brain injury, or multiple sclerosis * Psychosis (delusions or hallucinations) requiring antipsychotic treatment in the opinion of the study physician * Prolonged measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle (QT interval) * Treatment with citalopram is contraindicated in the opinion of the study physician * Failure of past treatment with citalopram for agitation after adequate trial at a minimally accepted dose (greater than or equal to 20 mg/day) * Treatment with a medication that would prohibit the safe concurrent use of citalopram, such as Monoamine oxidases (MAO) inhibitors * Need for psychiatric hospitalization or suicidal * Current participation in a clinical trial or in any study that may add a significant burden or affect neuropsychological or other study outcomes * Current treatment with antipsychotics, anticonvulsants (other than dilantin), other antidepressants (other than trazodone, less than or equal to 50 mg per day at bedtime), benzodiazepines (other than lorazepam), or psychostimulants * Any condition that, in the opinion of the study physician, makes it medically inappropriate or risky for the patient to enroll in the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NeuroBehavior Rating Scale-- Agitation9 weeksNeuroBehavioral Rating Scale- Agitation(NBRS-A) assesses multiple types of psychopathology common in dementia and is based on a seven point Likert scale of increasing severity for each item(i.e., 0=not present, 1=very mild, 2-mild, 3=moderate, 4=moderately severe, 5=severe, 6=extremely severe). The NBRS agitation subscore includes NBRS 'inhibition', 'agitation', and 'hostility'. The range is 0 to 18 points. Higher scores indicate more symptoms.
Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change in Agitation(CGIC)Baseline to 9 weeksModified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change in agitation(CGIC) accesses clinically significant change in agitation. A trained clinician, blind to treatment assignment, uses a 7-point Likert scale to rate change of each patient along a continuum from marked improvement(1), no change(4), and marked worsening(7). A number of aspects of the agitation is considered such as emotional agitation, mood liability/distress, psychomotor agitation, verbal aggression, and physical aggression. Range is 1-7.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)9 weeksCMAI examines several agitated behaviors including verbal, physical agitation, and other behaviors. Sub-items are summed. Range is 14-70. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-- Agitation Subscore9 weeksNPI agitation score is based on responses from an informed caregiver involved in the patient's life. Symptom severity (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) is multiplied by frequency (1=occasionally, less than once/week; 4 = very frequently, once or more/day or continuously) to obtain the NPI agitation score.Range is 0-12. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment activities included chart review, telephone interviews and screens, discussion with physicians, and recruitment in the clinic waiting areas and assisted living facilities affiliated with the clinics. The recruitment period lasted from August 2009 to December 2012.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Citalopram and Psychosocial Intervention
Target dose of 30 mg per day of citalopram, oral, and psychosocial intervention citalopram : target dose 30mg daily for 9 weeks
94
Placebo and Psychosocial Intervention
Matching placebo, oral, and psychosocial intervention placebo : daily for 9 weeks
92
Total186

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyFamily pressure to discontinue22
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCitalopram and Psychosocial InterventionPlacebo and Psychosocial InterventionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
88 Participants85 Participants173 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Age, Continuous78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Region of Enrollment
Canada
12 participants13 participants25 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
82 participants79 participants161 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants41 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants51 Participants101 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
90 / 9086 / 86
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 947 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change in Agitation(CGIC)

Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change in agitation(CGIC) accesses clinically significant change in agitation. A trained clinician, blind to treatment assignment, uses a 7-point Likert scale to rate change of each patient along a continuum from marked improvement(1), no change(4), and marked worsening(7). A number of aspects of the agitation is considered such as emotional agitation, mood liability/distress, psychomotor agitation, verbal aggression, and physical aggression. Range is 1-7.

Time frame: Baseline to 9 weeks

Population: The primary analysis was an intention-to-treat analysis; analysis was conducted as randomized. Data from the 186 randomized participants were used in the analytic model. 167 of the 186 patients had week 9 data on CGIC.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Citalopram and Psychosocial InterventionModified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change in Agitation(CGIC)40 percentage moderate/marked improvement
Placebo and Psychosocial InterventionModified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Clinical Global Impression of Change in Agitation(CGIC)26 percentage moderate/marked improvement
Comparison: Primary assessment of efficacy was based on intention-to-treat comparison of the difference in the NBRS-A scores at week 9 and comparison at week 9 for the CGIC. For the CGIC proportional odds analysis, the study was designed to have power greater than 80% to detect a difference of 20% between citalopram and placebo in the proportions of patients who improve (or worsen).p-value: 0.00795% CI: [1.23, 3.69]Proportional odds
Primary

NeuroBehavior Rating Scale-- Agitation

NeuroBehavioral Rating Scale- Agitation(NBRS-A) assesses multiple types of psychopathology common in dementia and is based on a seven point Likert scale of increasing severity for each item(i.e., 0=not present, 1=very mild, 2-mild, 3=moderate, 4=moderately severe, 5=severe, 6=extremely severe). The NBRS agitation subscore includes NBRS 'inhibition', 'agitation', and 'hostility'. The range is 0 to 18 points. Higher scores indicate more symptoms.

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The primary analysis was an intention-to-treat analysis; analysis was conducted as randomized. Data from the 186 randomized participants were used in the analytic model. 167 of the 186 patients had week 9 data on the NBRS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Citalopram and Psychosocial InterventionNeuroBehavior Rating Scale-- Agitation4.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Placebo and Psychosocial InterventionNeuroBehavior Rating Scale-- Agitation5.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Comparison: Primary assessment of efficacy was based on intention-to-treat comparison of the difference in the NBRS-A scores at week 9 and comparison at week 9 for the CGIC. For the NBRS-A, the study was designed to have 85% power to detect a standardized difference at week 9 of 40% for citalopram compared to placebo at week 9.p-value: 0.03695% CI: [-1.8, -0.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)

CMAI examines several agitated behaviors including verbal, physical agitation, and other behaviors. Sub-items are summed. Range is 14-70. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The primary analysis was an intention-to-treat analysis; analysis was conducted as randomized. Data from the 186 randomized participants were used in the analytic model. 169 of the 186 patients had week 9 data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Citalopram and Psychosocial InterventionCohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)27.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Placebo and Psychosocial InterventionCohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)28.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Secondary

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-- Agitation Subscore

NPI agitation score is based on responses from an informed caregiver involved in the patient's life. Symptom severity (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) is multiplied by frequency (1=occasionally, less than once/week; 4 = very frequently, once or more/day or continuously) to obtain the NPI agitation score.Range is 0-12. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The primary analysis was an intention-to-treat analysis; analysis was conducted as randomized. Data from the 186 randomized participants were used in the analytic model. 169 of the 186 patients had week 9 data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Citalopram and Psychosocial InterventionNeuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-- Agitation Subscore7.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Placebo and Psychosocial InterventionNeuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-- Agitation Subscore8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026