Coronary Artery Stenosis
Conditions
Keywords
coronary bifurcation, stent implantation, PCI, Optical Coherence Tomography
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare vessel healing at 9 months using OCT imaging for two different treatment techniques for treating bifurcation lesions. Quantitative assessment of OCT images will be used to assess re-endothelialization and quality of strut apposition to the vessel wall.
Detailed description
Background: There is an ongoing controversy over the efficacy and safety of different bifurcation stenting techniques. Critical considerations are the rate of restenosis at the side branch ostium, and completeness of healing at sites of overlap of stent struts, which may affect the risk of stent thrombosis. Methods: Patients with complex bifurcation lesions with involvement of a significant side branch requiring a stent are randomized into two treatment arms. The first group of 20 patients (group I) is treated with the AXXESS Biolimus A9 Bifurcation Stent System (Devax, Inc, Lake Forest CA), where additional everolimus-eluting Xience V stents (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) are implanted into the distal main branch and the side branch as required. The second group of 20 patients (group II) is treated with the culotte technique using everolimus-eluting Xience V stents. Kissing balloon dilatation using non-compliant balloons will complete the index procedure in all cases. At 9 months, control angiography (with QCA using dedicated software) and OCT (of both main vessel and side branch) is performed. Assessment of Results: 1. EP: stent strut coverage and stent strut apposition, assessed with OCT at 9 months. 2. EP: restenosis, restenosis at SB ostium, MACE, stent thrombosis.
Interventions
DEVICEAXXESS Biolimus A9-eluting bifurcation stent
implantation of stent
DEVICEculotte stenting (Xience V)
implantation of stent
Sponsors
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Patient older than 18 years 2. Written informed consent available 3. Patient eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention 4. Patients with a de novo and true coronary bifurcation lesion (Medina classification (1,1,1), (1,0,1) or (0,1,1)) 5. Target reference vessel diameter measured by QCA: 2-4 mm 6. Target lesion stenosis measured by QCA: \> 70% - \< 100% 7. Patients willing to provide written informed consent prior to participation and willing and able to participate in all follow-up evaluations
Exclusion criteria
1. Left ventricular ejection fraction of \< 30% 2. Impaired renal function (serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl) 3. Previous and/or planned brachytherapy of target vessel 4. Lesion of the left main trunk \> 50%, unprotected 5. Known allergies to antiplatelet, anticoagulation therapy, contrast media or everolimus 6. Pregnant and/or breast-feeding females or females who intend to become pregnant (pregnancy test required) 7. Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year 8. Patient currently enrolled in other investigational device or drug trial 9. Patient not able or willing to adhere to follow-up visits 10. Patients who intend to have a major surgical intervention within 6 months of enrolment in the study 11. Patient not able or willing to adhere to follow-up visits 12. Patients who previously participated in this study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary endpoint is % stent strut coverage and % stent strut apposition, assessed with optical coherence tomography, at 9 months follow-up. | 9 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Clinical outcome: Cumulative MACE rate at 1, 8, 9 and 12 months, yearly until 5 years. Separate rates will be provided for: cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven TLR, TVR. | 5 years |
Countries
Belgium
Outcome results
None listed