Skip to content

A Trial on Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Robotic Hysterectomy

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With and Without Robotic Assistance: a Randomized Prospective Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00895284
Enrollment
3
Registered
2009-05-08
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2013-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hysterectomy

Keywords

robotic, laparoscopic surgical procedures

Brief summary

Robotic technology has been used for laparoscopic hysterectomies for over 10 years. Mayo Clinic Arizona has used robotics in Gynecology for the last 10 years with well over 500 procedures performed. Similar to the laparoscopic approach, small incisions are utilized with the robotic approach. Robotic instruments differ from laparoscopic instruments in that the tips of the instruments can rotate more like the human wrist. The instruments are attached to the robotic arms which are controlled by your surgeon. The surgeon is seated at the surgeon's console which is located 12 feet from the patient while the surgical assistant is at your bedside assisting in the procedure. This study is being done to compare the procedure times and results after laparoscopic hysterectomies to laparoscopic hysterectomies performed with robotic assistance.

Interventions

Robotic hysterectomy.

Standard hysterectomy.

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- All subjects eligible for a laparoscopic hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and with or without appendectomy will be recruited.

Exclusion criteria

\- Patients with malignant disease, pregnancy, gynecologic infection, or requiring procedure on an emergent basis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total Procedure Time - Skin Incision to Skin ClosureAt skin closure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All subjects were recruited at Mayo Clinic in Arizona.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Robot
Robotic hysterectomy
3
Standard
Standard hysterectomy
0
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRobotTotal
Age Categorical
<=18 years
0 participants0 participants
Age Categorical
>=65 years
0 participants0 participants
Age Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 participants3 participants
Gender
Female
3 participants3 participants
Gender
Male
0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants3 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 30 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Total Procedure Time - Skin Incision to Skin Closure

Time frame: At skin closure.

Population: The study was terminated due to lack of funding; due to the small sample size, no analysis was done.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026