Hip Arthritis, Knee Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
Hip or knee arthroplasties allow a relief of pain and a good functional habilitative at patients suffering from degenerative osteoarthritis of these articulations with medium and long-term good results. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficiency in short and medium-term functional impact parlance of two surgical techniques: computer-assisted surgery and mini-invasive surgery compared to the conventional techniques thanks to an innovative technology of ambulatory analysis of walking.
Interventions
PROCEDUREArthroplasty
Hip or knee arthroplasty
Sponsors
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Weight \< 100 kg * score UCLA \> 4 * prosthesis of first intention
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant * score UCLA \< 4 * osteotomy near to prosthesis * prosthesis requiring an osseous transplant * prosthesis already set up * infections, contagious diseases (HIV, tuberculosis, hepatitis, venereal diseases) or metastasis * neuromuscular diseases able to perturb walking or staying * congenital or acquired disease, or previous surgery able to have consequences on results and prosthesis survey according to the surgeon
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the efficiency in short and medium-term functional impact parlance of two surgical techniques: computer-assisted surgery and mini-invasive surgery compared to the conventional techniques | 2 years after surgery |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Ambulatory analysis of the walking and coordination of lower limbs, direct and indirect costs | 2 years after surgery |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed