Skip to content

Safety and Accuracy of Regadenoson-Atropine Stress Echocardiography in CAD

Feasibility, Safety and Accuracy of Regadenoson-Atropine (REGAT) Stress Echocardiography for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: Angiographic Correlative Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00894179
Acronym
REGAT
Enrollment
45
Registered
2009-05-06
Start date
2009-10-01
Completion date
2012-04-01
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

coronary artery disease, stress echocardiography, regadenoson, atropine, coronary angiogram

Brief summary

Purpose: The investigators plan to test a newly FDA approved pharmacologic stress agent, Regadenoson, in conjunction with atropine in the use of stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The selective nature of Regadenoson allows for its use in patients with contraindications to the currently used drug, Adenosine, which is non-selective. Furthermore, the proposed protocol can be completed faster and without radiation exposure than the current protocol with adenosine. Design: This is a prospective study evaluating people with no prior diagnosis of coronary disease with a prior stress test and are scheduled for cardiac catheterization. Patients who meet inclusion criteria will undergo regadenoson-atropine echocardiography protocol prior to their catheterization. The study will be interpreted by two independent readers blinded to the catheterization results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the regadenoson-atropine study will be then be calculated using the coronary angiogram as a gold standard.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTregadenoson and atropine

Sponsors

Henry Ford Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \> 18 years old 2. Able to provide consent 3. Scheduled for cardiac catheterization either with or without a prior functional stress imaging study

Exclusion criteria

1. Any history of acute myocardial infarction, prior PCI in last 3 months, bypass surgery, 2. History of greater than first degree AV block, sick sinus syndrome in patients 3. Patients with a pacemaker/LBBB 4. History on uncontrolled arrhythmias 5. Patients with significant pulmonary disease, known or suspected bronchoconstrictive or bronchospastic lung disease or other hypersensitivity to adenosine 6. History of cardiac transplantation, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, acute myocarditis or pericarditis, severe valvular heart disease 7. Hemodynamically unstable patients 8. Dipyridamole use within 30 hours, consumption of methylxanthines (e.g., tea, coffee, caffeinated soft drinks, chocolate, or cocoa) within 12 hours, or use of sublingual nitroglycerin within 2 hours 9. History of glaucoma or obstructive uropathy 10. Allergy or hypersensitivity to atropine 11. Participation in another investigational drug study within 1 month or participation in any previous regadenoson trial 12. Pregnancy, breast feeding, or not using an acceptable method of birth control (if premenopausal) 13. . History of end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With REGAT Stress Echocardiography Protocol in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease.within 7 days of the REGAT stress echocardiographyPatients undergoing REGAT (regadenoson +atropine) stress echocardiography were evaluated for wall motion abnormalities (ischemia) using REGAT stress echocardiography to predict \> 70% luminal stenosis
Sensitivity of Coronary Artery Territorywithin 7 days of REGAT stress echocardiographySensitivity analysis of coronary artery territory using a 70% stenosis cutoff by angiography.
Specificity of Coronary Artery Territorywithin 7 days of REGAT stress echocardiographySpecificity analysis on Coronary Artery Territory using a 70% stenosis cutoff by angiography.
Positive Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Territorywithin 7 days of REGAT stress echocardiographyAnalysis of positive predictive value of coronary artery territory using a 70% stenosis cutoff by angiography.
Negative Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Territorywithin 7 days of REGAT stress echocardiographyAnalysis of negative predictive value of coronary artery territory using a 70% stenosis cutoff by angiography.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Preferred the REGAT Stress Echocardiography Protocol Over Prior Stress TestFollowing completion of REGAT stress echocardiography stress testPatient post-procedure satisfaction survey administered immediately following the REGAT stress echocardiography protocol to assess tolerability and preference of REGAT stress echo protocol. The survey consisted of three questions in Likert format.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKarthikeyan Ananthasubramaniam, MD FACC

Henry Ford Hospital

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between October 2009 and January 2012, out of 1596 outpatients referred for Coronary angiography we identified 54 patients meeting study criteria. Nine patients subsequently screen failed and hence we finally enrolled 45 patients into study.

Pre-assignment details

The first 10 patients were part of the run-in phase to test the safety of the combination of regadenoson and atropine and the request of the Food and Drug Administration. The first 10 patients did go on to complete the entire protocol and are included in the total of 45 patients. The study was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment and poor recruitment.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
31 Participants
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 45

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026