Skip to content

Comparison of Pressure-, Flow- and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA)-Triggering in Pediatric and Neonatal Ventilatory Care

Comparison of Pressure-, Flow- and NAVA-triggering in Pediatric and Neonatal Ventilatory Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00893087
Enrollment
18
Registered
2009-05-05
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2010-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiration

Keywords

Ventilatory care, children, intensive care, asynchrony, triggering, Children needing ventilatory care

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to study whether neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) provides advantages over current methods in detecting patients own breathing efforts in pediatric and neonatal ventilatory care. Our study hypothesis is that NAVA-technology is more accurate than currently used methods in detecting and assisting spontaneous breathing in children, and thus the patient-ventilator synchrony will improve.

Detailed description

Asynchrony means that the timing of support given by the ventilator is different from patients own breathing pattern. Asynchrony during ventilatory care may increase the risk for complications, make the weaning more difficult and may affect the survival rates. In this study we will compare two currently used methods pressure- and flow-triggering with a neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in synchronization of the ventilator support with patients own efforts.

Interventions

DEVICETriggering mode of the ventilator

10 min of each triggering mode

DEVICETriggering method of the ventilator

Flow triggering

Sponsors

Tampere University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Oulu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All children born over 30 weeks of gestation needing ventilatory care

Exclusion criteria

* Craniofacial malformation which does not allow feeding tobe positioning. Critical ventilatory or perfusion problems.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The time in ventilator-patient synchrony in each of the assist modes.30 min

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026