Skip to content

A Post Marketing Surveillance Study On Pregabalin (Lyrica) On Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pregabalin

Pregabalin (Lyrica) Action In Neuropathic Pain Syndrome (PAINS): A Post Marketing Surveillance Study On Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pregabalin

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00892008
Acronym
PAINS
Enrollment
2278
Registered
2009-05-01
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2021-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

pregabalin, neuropathic pain, safety

Brief summary

This study is being conducted as a regulatory requirement post initial marketing authorization. This is primarily a safety study. This was an open label study and patients were enrolled once the decision to prescribe the medication was made by the Investigator.

Interventions

DRUGPregabalin

Pregabalin 75-150 mg BID for at least 2 weeks.

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, 18 years old and above diagnosed with neuropathic pain.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients that are pregnant and lactating; and patients with known hypersensitivity to pregabalin or its related components.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Baseline through Final Visit (Week 4)Number and severity of adverse events, including serious adverse events. If the same subject had more than one occurance in the same preferred term event category, only the most severe occurrence was taken.
Discontinuations Due to Adverse EventsBaseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)Discontinuations due to adverse events by MedDRA system organ class and preferred term.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBaseline, Final Visit (Week 4)VAS Pain Score 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline. Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit.
Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final VisitsSecond Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)Physician's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete score points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final VisitsSecond Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)Patient's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ScoreBaseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)Change from Baseline in 10 cm VAS pain score; 10-point pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Change = scores at second visit and final visit minus score at Baseline.
Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final VisitSecond Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)Patient's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy. Efficacy item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final ViistSecond Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)Physician's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability. Tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final VisitSecond Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)Patient's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability. The tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit. Abbreviation: vst = visit.
Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final VisitSecond Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)Physician's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy. Efficacy item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
VAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBaseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2)VAS Pain Score: 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Second Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline. Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit .

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Phase 4 nationwide post-marketing surveillance study conducted between Sep 2006 and Aug 2008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pregabalin
75-150 milligrams (mg) twice a day (BID) for at least 2 weeks; followed by optional upward dose titration to 600 mg/day at the discretion of the physician/investigator.
2,278
Total2,278

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event37
Overall StudyDeath5
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up142
Overall StudyOther378

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPregabalin
Age, Customized
18-44 years
582 participants
Age, Customized
45-64 years
1054 participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
451 participants
Age, Customized
unspecified
191 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
female
1324 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
male
932 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
unspecified
22 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
345 / 2,278
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 2,278

Outcome results

Primary

Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events

Discontinuations due to adverse events by MedDRA system organ class and preferred term.

Time frame: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Safety population: all subjects who took at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinDiscontinuations Due to Adverse EventsCardiac Disorders: palpitations1 participants
PregabalinDiscontinuations Due to Adverse EventsEar and Labyrinth Disorders: vertigo1 participants
PregabalinDiscontinuations Due to Adverse EventsGastrointestinal Disorders: nausea5 participants
PregabalinDiscontinuations Due to Adverse EventsGastrointestinal Disorders: vomiting3 participants
PregabalinDiscontinuations Due to Adverse EventsGeneral/ Administrative Site Conditions: asthenia2 participants
PregabalinDiscontinuations Due to Adverse EventsNervous System Disorders: somnolence26 participants
PregabalinDiscontinuations Due to Adverse EventsResp., Thoracic & Mediastinal Disorders: snoring1 participants
PregabalinDiscontinuations Due to Adverse EventsVascular Disorders: hypertension1 participants
Primary

Number and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)

Number and severity of adverse events, including serious adverse events. If the same subject had more than one occurance in the same preferred term event category, only the most severe occurrence was taken.

Time frame: Baseline through Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Safety population: all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Cardiac Disorders1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)palpitations (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Ear and Labyrinth Disorders3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)ear disorder (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)vertigo (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)vertigo (severe)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Gastrointestinal Disorders44 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)abdominal discomfort (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)abdominal distension (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)abdominal pain (upper)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)constipation (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)constipation (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)diarrhoea (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)diarrhoea (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)dry mouth (mild)3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)ill-defined disorder (severe)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)irritability (mild)2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)irritability (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)multi-organ failure (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)oedema peripheral (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)oedema peripheral (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)pyrexia (mild)2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Hepatobiliary Disorders1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)jaundice (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Infections and Infestations2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)bronchopneumonia (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)pneumonia (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Investigations1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)weight increased (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)muscular weakness (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)myalgia (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Neoplasms Benign, Malignant and Unspecified3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)breast cancer stage III (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)metastases to central nervous system (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)metastatic neoplasm (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Nervous System Disorders233 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)balance disorder (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)dizziness (unspecified)2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)dizziness (mild)79 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)dizziness (moderate)47 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)headache (mild)3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)headache (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)hypersomnia (mild)5 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)hypersomnia (moderate)2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)incoherent (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)neuralgia (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)paraesthesia (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)sedation (moderate)3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)sedation (severe)2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)somnolence (unspecified)3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)somnolence (mild)62 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)somnolence (moderate)24 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)somnolence (severe)4 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)syncope (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)syncope (severe)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)tremor (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Psychiatric Disorders3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)abnormal dreams (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)rash generalized (severe)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Vascular Disorders3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)hypertension (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)hypotension (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)pallor (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)dry mouth (moderate)3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)dyspepsia (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)epigastric discomfort (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)nausea (mild)10 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)nausea (moderate)13 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)nausea (severe)4 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)vomiting (mild)8 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)vomiting (moderate)4 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)vomiting (severe)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)General Disorders & Administration Site Conditions20 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)asthenia (mild)2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)asthenia (moderate)2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)asthenia (severe)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)fatigue (moderate)2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)ill-defined disorder (mild)5 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)ill-defined disorder (moderate)2 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)anorexia (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)hypoglycemia (moderate)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)increased appetite (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)dizziness (severe)8 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)confusional state (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)insomnia (severe)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Reproductive and Breast Disorders1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)ejaculation disorder (unspecified)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders3 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)dyspnoea (severe)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)dyspnoea exertional (mild)1 participants
PregabalinNumber and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)snoring (severe)1 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

Change from Baseline in 10 cm VAS pain score; 10-point pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Change = scores at second visit and final visit minus score at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population: a subset of the safety population who underwent Baseline assessment, received study drug for at least 2 weeks, and had at least 1 follow-up visit. N = number of subjects with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score at Baseline Visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ScoreSecond Visit (n=1472)3.5 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ScoreFinal Visit (n=1126)5.1 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit

Patient's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy. Efficacy item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

Time frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population: a subset of the safety population who underwent Baseline assessment, received study drug for at least 2 weeks, and had at least 1 follow-up visit. N=number of subjects in ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=264); Final Visit: Excell206 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=264); Final Vst: Very Good8 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=264); Final Visit: Good0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=264); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=264); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=264); Final Visit: Missing50 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=775); Final Visit: Excell286 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=775); Final Vst: Very Good405 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=775); Final Visit: Good12 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=775); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=775); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=775); Final Visit: Missing71 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=450); Final Visit: Excellent34 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=450): Final Visit: Very Good266 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=450); Final Visit: Good127 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=450); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=450); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=450); Final Visit: Missing22 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=75); Final Visit: Excellent6 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=75); Final Visit: Very Good21 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=75); Final Visit: Good32 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=75); Final Visit: Fair10 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=75); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=75); Final Visit: Missing6 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Excellent1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit :Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Very Good2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Good2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Poor3 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Missing4 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=27); Final Visit: Excellent0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=27); Final Visit: Very Good3 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=27); Final Visit: Good0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=27); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=27); Final Visit: Missing23 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=27); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
Secondary

Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit

Patient's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability. The tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit. Abbreviation: vst = visit.

Time frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population: a subset of the safety population who underwent Baseline assessment, received study drug for at least 2 weeks, and had at least 1 follow-up visit. N=number of subjects in ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=278); Final Visit: Excell213 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=278); Final Vst: Very Good14 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=278); Final Visit: Good0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=278); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=278); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=278); Final Visit: Missing51 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=750); Final Visit: Excell257 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=750); Final Vst: Very Good415 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=750); Final Visit: Good13 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=750); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=750); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=750); Final Visit: Missing64 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=11); Final Visit: Very Good2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=11); Final Visit: Good1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=11); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=11); Final Visit: Poor3 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=11); Final Visit: Missing4 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=28); Final Visit: Excellent1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=28); Final Visit: Very Good2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=28); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=28); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=28); Final Visit: Missing24 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=465); Final Visit: Excellent27 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=465); Final Visit: Very Good255 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=465); Final Visit: Good151 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=465); Final Visit: Fair4 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=465); Final Visit: Poor2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=465); Final Visit: Missing26 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Excellent8 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Very Good18 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Good31 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Fair7 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Poor1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Missing6 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=11); Final Visit: Excellent1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=28); Final Visit: Good0 participants
Secondary

Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits

Patient's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

Time frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population: a subset of the safety population who underwent Baseline assessment, received study drug for at least 2 weeks, and had at least 1 follow-up visit. N=number of subjects in ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excell (n=260) ; Final Vst:Very Good11 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=260); Final Visit: Good1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=260) ; Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=778); Final Vst: Very Good394 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=778); Final Visit: Good13 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=778); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=778); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=778); Final Visit: Missing73 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=454); Final Visit: Excellent35 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=454); Final Visit: Very Good263 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=454); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=454); Final Visit: Missing22 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=81); Final Visit: Excellent9 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=81); Final Visit: Very Good23 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=81); Final Visit:: Good31 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=81); Final Visit: Fair9 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=81); Final Visit: Poor1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=81); Final Visit: Missing8 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Excellent1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Very Good2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Good2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Fair2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit::Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Poor2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=12); Final Visit: Missing3 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=18); Final Visit: Excellent0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=18); Final Visit: Very Good2 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=18); Final Visit: Good0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=18); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=18); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=18); Final Visit: Missing15 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=260); Final Vst: Excell201 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=260) ; Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=260); Final Visit: Missing47 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=778); Final Visit: Excell297 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=454); Final Visit: Good130 participants
PregabalinPatient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=454); Final Visit: Fair4 participants
Secondary

Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit

Physician's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy. Efficacy item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

Time frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population: a subset of the safety population who underwent Baseline assessment, received study drug for at least 2 weeks, and had at least 1 follow-up visit. N=number of subjects in ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=279); Final Visit: Excell217 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=279); Final Vst: Very Good8 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=279); Final Visit: Good1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=279); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=279); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Excellent (n=279); Final Visit: Missing53 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=813); Final Visit: Excell298 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=813); Final Vst: Very Good437 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=813); Final Visit: Good10 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=813); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=813); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Very Good (n=813); Final Visit: Missing68 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=418); Final Visit: Excellent19 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=418); Final Visit: Very Good258 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=418); Final Visit: Good115 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=418); Final Visit: Fair5 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=418); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Good (n=418); Final Visit: Missing21 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=66); Final Visit: Excellent4 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=66); Final Visit: Very Good20 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=66); Final Visit: Good28 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=66); Final Visit: Fair5 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=66); Final Visit: Poor2 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Fair (n=66); Final Visit: Missing7 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Excellent0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Very Good2 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Good2 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Poor1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Missing2 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=20); Final Visit: Excellent0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=20); Final Visit: Very Good1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=20); Final Visit: Good0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=20); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=20); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit2nd Visit: Missing (n=20); Final Visit: Missing19 participants
Secondary

Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits

Physician's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete score points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

Time frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population: a subset of the safety population who underwent Baseline assessment, received study drug for at least 2 weeks, and had at least 1 follow-up visit. N=number of subjects in ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=272); Final Vst: Excellent209 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=272); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=272); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=272); Final Visit: Missing55 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=803); Final Vst: Excellent307 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=803); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=803); Final Visit: Missing65 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=438); Final Visit: Excellent27 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=438); Final Visit: Very Good267 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=438); Final Visit: Good119 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=438); Final Visit: Fair4 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=438); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Good30 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Fair3 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Poor1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Missing8 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Very Good1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Good2 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Poor1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Missing2 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=12); Final Visit: Excellent0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=12); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=12); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=12); Final Visit: Missing12 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=272); Final Vst: Very Good6 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Excellent (n=272); Final Visit: Good2 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=803); Final Vst: Very Good421 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=803); Final Visit: Good10 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Very Good (n=803); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Good (n=438); Final Visit: Missing21 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Excellent7 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Fair (n=71); Final Visit: Very Good22 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Poor (n=7); Final Visit: Excellent0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=12); Final Visit: Very Good0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits2nd Visit: Missing (n=12); Final Visit: Good0 participants
Secondary

Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist

Physician's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability. Tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

Time frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population: a subset of the safety population who underwent Baseline assessment, received study drug for at least 2 weeks, and had at least 1 follow-up visit. N=number of subjects in ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Excellent (n=309); Final Vst: Very Good12 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Excellent (n=309); Final Visit: Good0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Excellent (n=309); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Excellent (n=309); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Good (n=436); Final Visit: Very Good254 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Good (n=436); Final Visit: Good135 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Good (n=436); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Good (n=436); Final Visit: Poor1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Good (n=436); Final Visit: Missing21 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Fair (n=67); Final Visit: Very Good19 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Fair (n=67); Final Visit: Good30 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Fair (n=67); Final Visit: Fair5 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Fair (n=67); Final Visit: Poor1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Missing (n=21); Final Visit: Missing18 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Very Good (n=764); Final Visit: Missing67 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Excellent (n=309); Final Visit: Excell237 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Excellent (n=309); Final Visit: Missing60 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Very Good (n=764); Final Visit: Excell255 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Very Good (n=764); Final Vst:Very Good431 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Very Good (n=764); Final Visit: Good9 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Very Good (n=764); Final Visit: Fair1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Very Good (n=764); Final Visit: Poor1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Good (n=436); Final Visit: Excellent24 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Fair (n=67); Final Visit: Excellent6 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Fair (n=67); Final Visit: Missing6 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Poor (n=6); Final Visit: Excellent1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Poor (n=6); Final Visit: Very Good0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Poor (n=6); Final Visit: Good1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Poor (n=6); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Poor (n=6); Final Visit: Poor3 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Poor (n=6); Final Visit: Missing1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Missing (n=21); Final Visit: Excellent1 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Missing (n=21); Final Visit: Very Good2 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Missing (n=21); Final Visit: Good0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Missing (n=21); Final Visit: Fair0 participants
PregabalinPhysician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist2nd Visit: Missing (n=21); Final Visit: Poor0 participants
Secondary

VAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final Visit

VAS Pain Score 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline. Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Final Visit (Week 4)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population: a subset of the safety population who underwent Baseline assessment, received study drug for at least 2 weeks, and had at least 1 follow-up visit. N=number of subjects in ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Mild Pain (n=25); Final Visit: Mild Pain12 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Mild Pain (n=25); Final Visit: Moderate Pain0 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Mild Pain (n=25); Final Visit: Severe Pain0 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Mild Pain (n=25); Final Visit: Missing13 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Moderate Pain (n=450); Final Visit: Mild Pain272 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Moderate Pain (n=450); Final Visit: Mod. Pain19 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Moderate Pain (n=450); Final Visit: Sev. Pain1 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Moderate Pain (n=450); Final Visit: Missing158 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Severe Pain (n=985); Final Visit: Mod. Pain134 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Severe Pain (n=985); Final Visit: Severe Pain6 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Severe Pain (n=985); Final Visit: Missing243 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Worst Poss. Pain (n=98); Final Visit: Missing18 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Missing (n=45); Final Visit: Mild Pain4 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Missing (n=45); Final Visit: Missing39 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Severe Pain (n=985); Final Visit: Mild Pain602 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Worst Poss. Pain (n=98); Final Vst: Mild Pain54 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Worst Poss. Pain (n=98); Final Vst: Mod Pain25 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Worst Poss. Pain (n=98); Final Visit: Sev Pain1 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Missing (n=45); Final Visit: Moderate Pain1 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final VisitBL: Missing (n=45); Final Visit: Severe Pain1 participants
Secondary

VAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second Visit

VAS Pain Score: 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Second Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline. Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit .

Time frame: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population: a subset of the safety population who underwent Baseline assessment, received study drug for at least 2 weeks, and had at least 1 follow-up visit. N=number of subjects in ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Missing (n=45) ; 2nd Visit: Severe Pain3 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Mild Pain (n=25); 2nd Visit: Mild Pain22 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Mild Pain (n= 25); 2nd Visit: Moderate Pain0 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Mild Pain (n= 25); 2nd Visit: Severe Pain0 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL:Mild Pain (n= 25); 2nd Visit: Worst Poss. Pain0 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Moderate Pain (n=450); 2nd Visit: Mild Pain300 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Moderate Pain (n=450): 2nd Visit: Mod Pain115 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Worst Poss. Pain (n=98); 2nd Visit: Mod Pain49 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Moderate Pain (n=450); 2nd Visit: Severe Pain2 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Mod Pain (n=450); 2nd Visit: Worst Poss. Pain0 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Moderate Pain (n=450); 2nd Visit: Missing33 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Severe Pain (n=985); 2nd Visit: Mild Pain348 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Severe Pain (n=985); 2nd Visit: Moderate Pain533 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Severe Pain (n=985) ; 2nd Visit: Severe Pain59 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Sev Pain (n=985); 2nd Visit: Worst Poss. pain0 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Severe Pain (n=985); 2nd Visit: Missing45 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Worst Poss. Pain (n=98) ; 2nd Visit: Mild Pain18 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Worst Poss. Pain (n=98); 2nd Visit: Sev Pain25 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL:Wrst Poss Pain (n=98); 2nd Visit: Wrst Poss. Pn1 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Missing (n=45) ; 2nd Visit: Moderate Pain1 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Mild Pain (n= 25); 2nd Visit: Missing3 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Worst Poss. Pain (n=98) ; 2nd Visit: Missing5 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Missing (n=45); 2nd Visit: Mild Pain3 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Missing (n=45) ; 2nd Visit: Worst Poss. Pain0 participants
PregabalinVAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second VisitBL: Missing (n=45); 2nd Visit: Missing38 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026