Skip to content

Lanreotide Autogel in the Symptomatic Treatment of Refractory Diarrhea

A Phase II-III, Multicentre, Prospective, Exploratory, Open Label Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel 120mg in the Symptomatic Treatment of Patients With Refractory Diarrhea

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00891371
Acronym
MEDARD
Enrollment
42
Registered
2009-05-01
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2019-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diarrhea

Keywords

symptomatic treatment of patients with refractory diarrhea

Brief summary

The purpose of this study, is to assess the effect of lanreotide Autogel 120mg on stool frequency in subjects with refractory diarrhea at day 28 (mean of last 7 days) compared to baseline.

Interventions

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male/female with refractory diarrhea for at least 1 month, after normal extended work-up to exclude causes of diarrhea, not or not enough responding to standard anti-diuretics as evaluated by the investigator * Patient mentally fit for completing a diary

Exclusion criteria

* Has already received a treatment with somatostatin analogues for the treatment of refractory diarrhea * Had a weight of stool \< 600g in a 72hrs stool collection * Has received a treatment with laxatives within the last week before study entry * Suffers from IBS with alternating bowel habits and predominant constipation, suffers from infectious and/or inflammatory gastro-enteritis (colitis ulcerosa, crohn's disease and macroscopic colitis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Patients Having Minimum Reduction of 50% or Normalization (≤3 Stools/24hours) in the Mean Number of Stools (Mean of Last 7 Days)Day 28

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineBaseline (Day 1), Day 21, Day 28, Day 49 and Day 56SF36 QOL includes 1 multi-item scale measuring each of 8 health concepts. These scores are summed to produce raw scale scores for each health concept which are transformed to a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. There is in addition a single-item measure of Health Transition IBS-QOL is a self-report QOL measure specific to IBS that can be used to assess impact of IBS and its treatment. This consists of 34 items,each with a 5 point response scale.Individual responses to 34 items are summed and averaged for a total score and transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating better IBS specific QOL
Change in Median Score of Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale) Compared to BaselineBaseline (day 1), day 28 and day 56Each patient scored his/her stool on the Bristol Stool Form Scale: Type 1 - Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); Type 2 - Sausage-shaped but lumpy; Type 3 - Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface; Type 4 - Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; Type 5 - Soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily); Type 6 - Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; Type 7 - Water no solid pieces, Entirely liquid
Percent Change in Mean Number of Stools Compared to BaselineBaseline (Day 1), Day 28 and Day 56
Change From Baseline in Relative Frequency of Normalization (≤3 Stools) in SubjectsBaseline (Day 1), Day 28 and Day 56Normalization of stool frequency in subjects with refractory diarrhoea at Day 28 and Day 56 (mean of last 7 days) compared to Baseline.
Percentage of Patients Having Minimum Reduction of At Least 50% or Normalization of the Mean Number of StoolsDay 56

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a multicentered study performed at 18 investigational sites in Belgium of which 11 recruited patients.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg one subcutaneous injection on Day 1 and Day 28.
36
Total36

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Pre-assignmentConsent withdrawal1
Pre-assignmentInclusion/exclusion5
TreatmentAdverse Event2
TreatmentDeath1
TreatmentLack of Efficacy5
TreatmentLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLanreotide Autogel 120 mg
Age, Continuous55.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
Age, Customized
>=30 to <65 years
22 participants
Age, Customized
<30 years
2 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
12 participants
Mean Number of Stools5.5 Number of Stools
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
Quality Of Life (QOL) - Scales
IBS QOL: Total Score
47.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5
Quality Of Life (QOL) - Scales
SF36 QOL: Bodily Pain
48.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.4
Quality Of Life (QOL) - Scales
SF36 QOL: General Health
43.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.8
Quality Of Life (QOL) - Scales
SF36 QOL: Mental Health
47.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1
Quality Of Life (QOL) - Scales
SF36 QOL: Physical Functioning
60.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.1
Quality Of Life (QOL) - Scales
SF36 QOL: Role Emotional
52.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.7
Quality Of Life (QOL) - Scales
SF36 QOL: Role Physical
39.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.9
Quality Of Life (QOL) - Scales
SF36 QOL: Social Functioning
41.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.2
Quality Of Life (QOL) - Scales
SF36 QOL: Vitality
38.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.1
Race [Caucasian / White]36 Participants
Score of Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale)6.0 units on a scale
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients Having Minimum Reduction of 50% or Normalization (≤3 Stools/24hours) in the Mean Number of Stools (Mean of Last 7 Days)

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT) Population \[All treated subjects with at least 3 Days of available primary efficacy variable data for both Baseline and post Baseline periods\]

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgPercentage of Patients Having Minimum Reduction of 50% or Normalization (≤3 Stools/24hours) in the Mean Number of Stools (Mean of Last 7 Days)Reduction of at least 50% or normalization - Yes44.4 Percentage of patients
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgPercentage of Patients Having Minimum Reduction of 50% or Normalization (≤3 Stools/24hours) in the Mean Number of Stools (Mean of Last 7 Days)Reduction of at least 50% or normalization - No55.6 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Relative Frequency of Normalization (≤3 Stools) in Subjects

Normalization of stool frequency in subjects with refractory diarrhoea at Day 28 and Day 56 (mean of last 7 days) compared to Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 28 and Day 56

Population: ITT Population; Missing number of subjects = 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange From Baseline in Relative Frequency of Normalization (≤3 Stools) in SubjectsChange from Baseline to Day 2827.5 Percentage of days per WeekStandard Deviation 34.7
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange From Baseline in Relative Frequency of Normalization (≤3 Stools) in SubjectsChange from Baseline to Day 5633.0 Percentage of days per WeekStandard Deviation 34.3
Secondary

Change in Median Score of Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale) Compared to Baseline

Each patient scored his/her stool on the Bristol Stool Form Scale: Type 1 - Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); Type 2 - Sausage-shaped but lumpy; Type 3 - Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface; Type 4 - Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; Type 5 - Soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily); Type 6 - Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; Type 7 - Water no solid pieces, Entirely liquid

Time frame: Baseline (day 1), day 28 and day 56

Population: ITT Population; Missing number of subjects = 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in Median Score of Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale) Compared to BaselineChange from Baseline to Day 280.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in Median Score of Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale) Compared to BaselineChange from Baseline to Day 56-0.5 units on a scale
Secondary

Change in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to Baseline

SF36 QOL includes 1 multi-item scale measuring each of 8 health concepts. These scores are summed to produce raw scale scores for each health concept which are transformed to a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. There is in addition a single-item measure of Health Transition IBS-QOL is a self-report QOL measure specific to IBS that can be used to assess impact of IBS and its treatment. This consists of 34 items,each with a 5 point response scale.Individual responses to 34 items are summed and averaged for a total score and transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating better IBS specific QOL

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 21, Day 28, Day 49 and Day 56

Population: ITT Population, Analysis based on number (n) of patients with a valid value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Physical Functioning (D21), n=33-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Physical Functioning (D28), n=342.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Physical Functioning (D49), n=262.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Physical Functioning (D56), n=351.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Role Physical (D21), n=334.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Role Physical (D28), n=3412.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Role Physical (D49), n=266.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Role Physical (D56), n=3511.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Role Emotional (D21), n=33-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.8
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Role Emotional (D28), n=343.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.7
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Role Emotional (D49), n=257.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.2
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Role Emotional (D56), n=355.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.6
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Vitality (D21), n=323.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Vitality (D28), n=335.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Vitality (D49), n=242.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Vitality (D56), n=347.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Mental Health (D21), n=325.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.9
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Mental Health (D28), n=338.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.2
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Mental Health (D49), n=248.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.1
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Mental Health (D56), n=3410.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.7
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Social Functioning (D21), n=319.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.8
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Social Functioning (D28), n=3316.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Social Functioning (D49), n=2419.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.8
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Social Functioning (D56), n=3314.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.5
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Bodily Pain (D21), n=33-4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.5
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Bodily Pain (D28), n=348.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.6
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Bodily Pain (D49), n=268.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.2
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: Bodily Pain (D56), n=355.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.7
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: General Health (D21), n=33-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: General Health (D28), n=332.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: General Health (D49), n=264.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineSF36 QOL: General Health (D56), n=343.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineIBS QOL: Total Score (D21), n=279.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineIBS QOL: Total Score (D28), n=2613.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineIBS QOL: Total Score (D49), n=2216.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgChange in QOL-Quality of Life {Assess Using Short Form (SF-36) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-QOL} Compared to BaselineIBS QOL: Total Score (D56), n=2916.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Having Minimum Reduction of At Least 50% or Normalization of the Mean Number of Stools

Time frame: Day 56

Population: ITT Population; Missing number of subjects: 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgPercentage of Patients Having Minimum Reduction of At Least 50% or Normalization of the Mean Number of StoolsReduction of at least 50% or normalization - Yes54.3 Percentage of participants
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgPercentage of Patients Having Minimum Reduction of At Least 50% or Normalization of the Mean Number of StoolsReduction of at least 50% or normalization - No45.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change in Mean Number of Stools Compared to Baseline

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 28 and Day 56

Population: ITT Population; Missing number of subjects = 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgPercent Change in Mean Number of Stools Compared to BaselineChange from Baseline to Day 28-25.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 36.7
Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgPercent Change in Mean Number of Stools Compared to BaselineChange from Baseline to Day 56-30.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 38

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026