Skip to content

An Open-label Extension Study of Canakinumab in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Active Systemic Manifestations Manifestations and Response Characterization Study in Canakinumab Treatment-naïve Patients With Active SJIA With and Without Fever.

An Open-label Extension Study of Canakinumab (ACZ885) in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) and Active Systemic Manifestations Who Participated in Studies ACZ885G2301 and ACZ885G2305; and Response Characterization Study in Canakinumab Treatment-naïve Patients With Active SJIA With and Without Fever

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00891046
Acronym
β-SPECIFIC 3
Enrollment
270
Registered
2009-04-30
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2019-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Keywords

Flare, arthritis, IL-1beta antagonist, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, CHAQ, steroids, ACR pediatric response, Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with active flare

Brief summary

This open-label extension study will permit patients with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) who previously were responsive to treatment with canakinumab and canakinumab treatment-naïve patients with active SJIA with and without fever to be retreated with 4 mg/kg s.c. every 4 weeks and assessed for continued efficacy and safety until discontinuation or when study CACZ885G2402 is in place at their study center or around March 2013, whichever occurs first. Patients who are steroid-free will be able to taper their canakinumab dose to 2 mg/kg s.c. every 4 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGCanakinumab

Canakinumab

Sponsors

Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization
CollaboratorOTHER
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients from study CACZ885G2305 or CACZ885G2301 who achieved an adapted ACR pediatric 30 response 15 days after their initial dose of canakinumab but clinically deteriorated afterwards or a minimum ACR Pediatric 30 response was not maintained after Day 15 and intervention is deemed necessary by the investigator, or Patients in study CACZ885G2301 who are not eligible to enter Part II (withdrawal part) because they were not able to meet the corticosteroid entry criteria , or Responder patients in Part I or Part II who had not flared when CACZ885G2301 was stopped, or CACZ885G2301 patients who were responders in Part I but experienced a flare in Part II. * Treatment-naïve patients need to meet the following criteria: * Confirmed diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis as per ILAR definition that must have occurred at least 2 months prior to enrollment with onset of disease \< 16 years of age * Male and female patients aged ≥ 2 to \< 20 years of age * Active disease at the time of enrollment defined as having 2 or more of the following: * Documented spiking, intermittent fever (body temperature \> 38°C) for at least 1 day during the screening period and within 1 week before first canakinumab dose * At least 2 joints with active arthritis * AND C-reactive protein (CRP) \> 30 mg/L (normal range \< 10 mg/L) Rash Serositis Lymphadenopathy Hepatosplenomegaly * Naïve to canakinumab Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion criteria

* History of allergy or hypersensitivity to study drug * With active or recurrent bacterial, fungal or viral infections at time of enrollment Other protocol inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEFrom start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participants or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Treatment related AEs or SAEs were defined as AEs or SAEs that were suspected to be related to study treatment as per investigator.
Number of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the StudyFrom start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)Immunogenicity assessment included determination of anti-canakinumab (ACZ885) antibodies in serum samples using BIAcore system.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudyFrom start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)Local injection site tolerability was assessed on the injection site. Each participant was classified into one of the following four categories: 1. no tolerability reactions at any time during the study, 2. mild reaction observed on at least one occasion but no moderate or severe reactions. 3. moderate reaction observed on at least one occasion but no severe reaction. 4. severe reaction observed on at least one occasion.
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierAdapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 1-100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 1-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of C-reactive protein (CRP) and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) during the preceding week. Response was defined as more than or equal to (≥) 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature less than or equal to (≤) 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierAdapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierAdapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierThe CHAQ was used to assess physical ability, overall well- being and pain intensity experienced by participants. The CHAQ (disability and well-being) dimension consisted of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and other activities. Participants were graded for the response in four categories, ranging from 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Participant's pain intensity was assessed by parents and adult participants (18-20 years old) on a VAS scale of 0-100 mm (0 mm: no pain to 100: very severe pain). Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). For both scales, lower scores indicate increased functional ability.
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierThe Child Health Questionnaire - Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) instrument was used to measure HRQoL aged 5 to 18 years from a parent's perspective. This 14 concept questionnaire measured physical and psychosocial health of the participants on following points: physical functioning, role/social emotional, role/social behavior, role/social physical, bodily pain, general behavior, mental health, self-esteem, general health perception, change in health, parental impact - emotional, parental impact - time, family activities, and family cohesion. Total score ranged from 1-100. Increase in score represented improvement in overall well being of participants. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value).
Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierEQ-5D HRQoL tool was used for participants above 12 years and EQ-5D proxy for 8-11 years. EQ-5D index scores range from -0.11 (worst possible health, worse than dead), to 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). Utility based EQ-5D questionnaire provides generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal based on 2 parts: EQ-5D descriptive system - 5 dimensions each with 3 levels (1:no, 2:moderate, 3:severe problem) on: mobility (1=0, 2=0.069, 3=0.314), self-care (1=0, 2=0.104, 3=0.214), usual activities (1=0, 2=0.036, 3=0.094), pain/discomfort (1=0, 2=0, 3=0.386) and anxiety/depression (1=0, 2=0.071, 3=0.2). EQ-5D Total score= 1-0.081-(score of level 2 in present)-0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents). EQ-5D total score: 1=high quality of life; -0.59 worst quality of life; and EQ-VAS - record participant's self-rated health on vertical, visual analog scale as '100=Best and 0=Worst imaginable health state'. Positive change from baseline score indicated improved health status.
Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierAdapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of -CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38°C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for Height to Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierGrowth velocity parameter height percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.
Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierInactive disease was defined as no joints with active arthritis; no fever (body temperature ≤ 38 degree Celsius); no rheumatoid rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to SJIA; normal CRP, and a rating of no disease activity on the Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity (with a best possible score ≤10 mm on the VAS).
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameters to Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierGrowth velocity parameter weight percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierSleep patterns in children and adolescents aged between 11 and 15 years were determined using PDSS instrument to evaluate whether canakinumab helps in reducing sleepiness in children with SJIA. Participants were assessed on 8 items of PDSS, on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 - never, 1 - seldom, 2- sometimes, 3 - frequently and 4 - always). The sum of all the items was reported as total score with a range of 0-32. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). A positive change from baseline score indicated improvement.
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierAdapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6 worsening by more than 30%. For minimum adapted ACR paediatric scores, the last measurement recorded from the participant's previous study was considered baseline for the current study.
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for BMI to Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierGrowth velocity parameter BMI percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.
Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierSteroid tapering with oral steroids was allowed if the participant achieved an adapted ACR Paediatric 50 response and had no fever. A participant was considered to have tapered steroids successfully, if the steroid dose was reduced from baseline and the participant did not flare and maintained a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement. A participant was considered to have unsuccessfully tapered steroids if the steroid dose was reduced during the study but dose at last assessment was equal to or greater than dose at baseline or; if steroid dose was reduced but the participant did not maintain a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement.
Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kgBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierThe canakinumab dose could be reduced from 4 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg in participants who were steroid-free, if requested by the treating physician and agreed by the sponsor. For treatment naive participants , dose reduction was allowed after the participant had received 6 months treatment with canakinumab.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical RemissionBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierClinical remission was defined as at least 6 months of inactive disease or at least 12 months of inactive disease on medication during the extension period. Participants with inactive disease for at least 6 months, but had loss of inactive disease before 12 months were also determined.

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 61 centres in 20 countries.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 147 participants from studies CACZ885G2301 (NCT number: NCT00889863) and CACZ885G2305 (NCT number: NCT00886769) and 123 canakinumab treatment- naive participants were enrolled into this extension study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ACZ885 Treated: Group 1 (Discontinued From Core Study)
Participants who discontinued from NCT00889863, received a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks unless discontinuation occurs. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
33
ACZ885 Treated: Group 2 (Completed Core Study)
Participants who completed study NCT00889863, received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
63
ACZ885 Treated: Group 3 (Steroid Taper Failures in Core Study)
Participants who failed to taper their steroid dose in NCT00889863; received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
40
ACZ885 Treated: Group 4 (Other Criteria)
Participants who previously received canakinumab treatment in Studies NCT00889863 and NCT00886769, but did not fulfill the criteria for Group 1, 2 or 3, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
11
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment- naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
123
Total270

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdministrative problems00001
Overall StudyAdverse Event432014
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up00001
Overall StudyParticipant no longer required drug02001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11001
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect5219220
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21211

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalACZ885 Treatment NaiveACZ885 Treated: Group 4 (Other Criteria)ACZ885 Treated: Group 3 (Steroid Taper Failures in Core Study)ACZ885 Treated: Group 2 (Completed Core Study)ACZ885 Treated: Group 1 (Discontinued From Core Study)
Age, Customized
12 -- <20 years
80 participants40 participants2 participants10 participants17 participants11 participants
Age, Customized
≥ 20 years
2 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
2 -- <4 years
24 participants18 participants1 participants3 participants2 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
4 -- <6 years
42 participants15 participants5 participants6 participants10 participants6 participants
Age, Customized
6 -- <12 years
122 participants50 participants3 participants21 participants32 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
156 Participants75 Participants5 Participants23 Participants34 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
114 Participants48 Participants6 Participants17 Participants29 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
124 / 14791 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
47 / 14740 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participants or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Treatment related AEs or SAEs were defined as AEs or SAEs that were suspected to be related to study treatment as per investigator.

Time frame: From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)

Population: The analysis was performed in safety set (SS), defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAESAEs40 participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEDiscontinuation due to any SAE13 participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEAEs108 participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAETreatment Related AEs44 participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEDiscontinuation due to any AE14 participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAETreatment related SAEs1 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEDiscontinuation due to any AE18 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEAEs137 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAESAEs47 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAETreatment related SAEs4 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEDiscontinuation due to any SAE14 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAETreatment Related AEs57 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the Study

Immunogenicity assessment included determination of anti-canakinumab (ACZ885) antibodies in serum samples using BIAcore system.

Time frame: From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)

Population: The analysis was performed on the SS population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the Study0 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the Study0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study

Local injection site tolerability was assessed on the injection site. Each participant was classified into one of the following four categories: 1. no tolerability reactions at any time during the study, 2. mild reaction observed on at least one occasion but no moderate or severe reactions. 3. moderate reaction observed on at least one occasion but no severe reaction. 4. severe reaction observed on at least one occasion.

Time frame: From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)

Population: The analysis was performed in SS population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudyNo tolerability reaction115 participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudyMild tolerability reaction6 participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudyModerate tolerability reaction2 participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudySevere tolerability reaction0 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudySevere tolerability reaction0 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudyNo tolerability reaction129 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudyModerate tolerability reaction3 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudyMild tolerability reaction15 participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study

Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 1-100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 1-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of C-reactive protein (CRP) and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) during the preceding week. Response was defined as more than or equal to (≥) 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature less than or equal to (≤) 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria76.9 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria80.8 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria69.2 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria80.8 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria57.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria91.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria91.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria91.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria91.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria91.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria76.9 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria69.2 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria92.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria64.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria95.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria92.9 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria80 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria90 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study

Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit. For arm 'ACZ885 treatment naive: Group 2' there were no participants who had discontinued other biologics due to safety/tolerability issues.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria60 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria83.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria93.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria86.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria96.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria50 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria50 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria50 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria50 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria91.0 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria68.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria91.0 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria77.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria88.8 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study

Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria88.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria92.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria88.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria65.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria88.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria66.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria66.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria0 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria50 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70 criteria86.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50 criteria91.1 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥30 criteria92.2 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90 criteria76.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR 100 criteria67.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study

The CHAQ was used to assess physical ability, overall well- being and pain intensity experienced by participants. The CHAQ (disability and well-being) dimension consisted of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and other activities. Participants were graded for the response in four categories, ranging from 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Participant's pain intensity was assessed by parents and adult participants (18-20 years old) on a VAS scale of 0-100 mm (0 mm: no pain to 100: very severe pain). Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). For both scales, lower scores indicate increased functional ability.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyDisability score-0.375 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyPain Intensity score-13 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyOverall well-being score-18 units on a scale
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyOverall well-being score0 units on a scale
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyDisability score0 units on a scale
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyPain Intensity score0 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyOverall well-being score0 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyDisability score-0.125 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyPain Intensity score0 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyDisability score0 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyPain Intensity score0 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyOverall well-being score-10 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyOverall well-being score-28 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyDisability score-0.7143 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of StudyPain Intensity score-39 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study

EQ-5D HRQoL tool was used for participants above 12 years and EQ-5D proxy for 8-11 years. EQ-5D index scores range from -0.11 (worst possible health, worse than dead), to 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). Utility based EQ-5D questionnaire provides generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal based on 2 parts: EQ-5D descriptive system - 5 dimensions each with 3 levels (1:no, 2:moderate, 3:severe problem) on: mobility (1=0, 2=0.069, 3=0.314), self-care (1=0, 2=0.104, 3=0.214), usual activities (1=0, 2=0.036, 3=0.094), pain/discomfort (1=0, 2=0, 3=0.386) and anxiety/depression (1=0, 2=0.071, 3=0.2). EQ-5D Total score= 1-0.081-(score of level 2 in present)-0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents). EQ-5D total score: 1=high quality of life; -0.59 worst quality of life; and EQ-VAS - record participant's self-rated health on vertical, visual analog scale as '100=Best and 0=Worst imaginable health state'. Positive change from baseline score indicated improved health status.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with EQ-5D assessment in the given visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ- 5D Utility Index0.204 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ-VAS21 units on a scale
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ- 5D Utility Index0 units on a scale
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ-VAS0 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ- 5D Utility Index0.069 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ-VAS5 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ-VAS28 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ- 5D Utility Index0.2385 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ- 5D Utility Index0.228 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of StudyEQ-VAS30 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for BMI to Last Assessment of Study

Growth velocity parameter BMI percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for BMI to Last Assessment of Study1.08 Percentile
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for BMI to Last Assessment of Study-0.77 Percentile
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for Height to Last Assessment of Study

Growth velocity parameter height percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for Height to Last Assessment of Study-0.01 Percentile
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for Height to Last Assessment of Study0 Percentile
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameters to Last Assessment of Study

Growth velocity parameter weight percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameters to Last Assessment of Study0.1 Percentile
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameters to Last Assessment of Study0 Percentile
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study

The Child Health Questionnaire - Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) instrument was used to measure HRQoL aged 5 to 18 years from a parent's perspective. This 14 concept questionnaire measured physical and psychosocial health of the participants on following points: physical functioning, role/social emotional, role/social behavior, role/social physical, bodily pain, general behavior, mental health, self-esteem, general health perception, change in health, parental impact - emotional, parental impact - time, family activities, and family cohesion. Total score ranged from 1-100. Increase in score represented improvement in overall well being of participants. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value).

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with HRQoL assessment in the given visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 psychosocial score3.8815 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 physical score14.0407 units on a scale
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 physical score0.6959 units on a scale
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 psychosocial score1.4004 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 physical score1.3716 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 psychosocial score0.7582 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 psychosocial score11.9798 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 physical score13.9255 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 psychosocial score9.3209 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of StudyCHQ-PF50 physical score18.8758 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study

Sleep patterns in children and adolescents aged between 11 and 15 years were determined using PDSS instrument to evaluate whether canakinumab helps in reducing sleepiness in children with SJIA. Participants were assessed on 8 items of PDSS, on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 - never, 1 - seldom, 2- sometimes, 3 - frequently and 4 - always). The sum of all the items was reported as total score with a range of 0-32. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). A positive change from baseline score indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analysed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point and with an assessment of PDSS score in the given visit..

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveChange From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study1 units on a scale
ACZ885 TreatedChange From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study0.5 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study0 units on a scale
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study-4.5 units on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg

The canakinumab dose could be reduced from 4 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg in participants who were steroid-free, if requested by the treating physician and agreed by the sponsor. For treatment naive participants , dose reduction was allowed after the participant had received 6 months treatment with canakinumab.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was done in FAS population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg9 participants
ACZ885 TreatedNumber of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg29 participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg4 participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg2 participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaiveNumber of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg18 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100

Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of -CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38°C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit. For arm 'ACZ885 treated: Group 2 (Completed core study)' there were no Non-Responders participants available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 50 criteria82.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 70 criteria82.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥30 criteria82.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 90 criteria76.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR 100 criteria58.8 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR 100 criteria17.6 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥30 criteria76.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 90 criteria23.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 70 criteria52.9 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 50 criteria70.6 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 70 criteria83.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR 100 criteria50 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥30 criteria83.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 50 criteria83.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 90 criteria50 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 50 criteria90.9 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 90 criteria78.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR 100 criteria66.1 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥30 criteria92.6 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100ACR ≥ 70 criteria87.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen

Steroid tapering with oral steroids was allowed if the participant achieved an adapted ACR Paediatric 50 response and had no fever. A participant was considered to have tapered steroids successfully, if the steroid dose was reduced from baseline and the participant did not flare and maintained a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement. A participant was considered to have unsuccessfully tapered steroids if the steroid dose was reduced during the study but dose at last assessment was equal to or greater than dose at baseline or; if steroid dose was reduced but the participant did not maintain a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants who were steroid users at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSteroid free36.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSuccessfully tapered27.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenUnsuccessfully tapered18.2 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenDid not taper18.2 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSteroid free55.6 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenDid not taper22.2 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSuccessfully tapered0 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenUnsuccessfully tapered22.2 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenDid not taper36.8 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSuccessfully tapered21.1 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenUnsuccessfully tapered18.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSteroid free23.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSteroid free25 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSuccessfully tapered25 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenDid not taper25 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenUnsuccessfully tapered25 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenDid not taper31 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenUnsuccessfully tapered11.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSuccessfully tapered23.9 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenSteroid free33.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission

Clinical remission was defined as at least 6 months of inactive disease or at least 12 months of inactive disease on medication during the extension period. Participants with inactive disease for at least 6 months, but had loss of inactive disease before 12 months were also determined.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an assessment in the given visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Clinical RemissionAt least 6 consecutive months of inactive disease42.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Clinical RemissionAt least 12 consecutive months of inactive disease26.8 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Clinical RemissionLoss of inactive disease after 6 months8.9 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants With Clinical RemissionAt least 6 consecutive months of inactive disease52.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants With Clinical RemissionAt least 12 consecutive months of inactive disease42.9 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants With Clinical RemissionLoss of inactive disease after 6 months6.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease

Inactive disease was defined as no joints with active arthritis; no fever (body temperature ≤ 38 degree Celsius); no rheumatoid rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to SJIA; normal CRP, and a rating of no disease activity on the Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity (with a best possible score ≤10 mm on the VAS).

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an assessment in the given visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease39.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease79.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease12.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease36.4 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease50.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study

Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6 worsening by more than 30%. For minimum adapted ACR paediatric scores, the last measurement recorded from the participant's previous study was considered baseline for the current study.

Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier

Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 10087.5 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 30100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment NaivePercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 10093.7 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 TreatedPercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 30100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 7078.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 3091.3 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 9069.6 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 10039.1 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 5087 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 10080 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 50100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 70100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 90100 Percentage of participants
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyACR ≥ 30100 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026