Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Flare, arthritis, IL-1beta antagonist, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, CHAQ, steroids, ACR pediatric response, Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with active flare
Brief summary
This open-label extension study will permit patients with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) who previously were responsive to treatment with canakinumab and canakinumab treatment-naïve patients with active SJIA with and without fever to be retreated with 4 mg/kg s.c. every 4 weeks and assessed for continued efficacy and safety until discontinuation or when study CACZ885G2402 is in place at their study center or around March 2013, whichever occurs first. Patients who are steroid-free will be able to taper their canakinumab dose to 2 mg/kg s.c. every 4 weeks.
Interventions
Canakinumab
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients from study CACZ885G2305 or CACZ885G2301 who achieved an adapted ACR pediatric 30 response 15 days after their initial dose of canakinumab but clinically deteriorated afterwards or a minimum ACR Pediatric 30 response was not maintained after Day 15 and intervention is deemed necessary by the investigator, or Patients in study CACZ885G2301 who are not eligible to enter Part II (withdrawal part) because they were not able to meet the corticosteroid entry criteria , or Responder patients in Part I or Part II who had not flared when CACZ885G2301 was stopped, or CACZ885G2301 patients who were responders in Part I but experienced a flare in Part II. * Treatment-naïve patients need to meet the following criteria: * Confirmed diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis as per ILAR definition that must have occurred at least 2 months prior to enrollment with onset of disease \< 16 years of age * Male and female patients aged ≥ 2 to \< 20 years of age * Active disease at the time of enrollment defined as having 2 or more of the following: * Documented spiking, intermittent fever (body temperature \> 38°C) for at least 1 day during the screening period and within 1 week before first canakinumab dose * At least 2 joints with active arthritis * AND C-reactive protein (CRP) \> 30 mg/L (normal range \< 10 mg/L) Rash Serositis Lymphadenopathy Hepatosplenomegaly * Naïve to canakinumab Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply
Exclusion criteria
* History of allergy or hypersensitivity to study drug * With active or recurrent bacterial, fungal or viral infections at time of enrollment Other protocol inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants) | An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participants or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Treatment related AEs or SAEs were defined as AEs or SAEs that were suspected to be related to study treatment as per investigator. |
| Number of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the Study | From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants) | Immunogenicity assessment included determination of anti-canakinumab (ACZ885) antibodies in serum samples using BIAcore system. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study | From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants) | Local injection site tolerability was assessed on the injection site. Each participant was classified into one of the following four categories: 1. no tolerability reactions at any time during the study, 2. mild reaction observed on at least one occasion but no moderate or severe reactions. 3. moderate reaction observed on at least one occasion but no severe reaction. 4. severe reaction observed on at least one occasion. |
| Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 1-100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 1-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of C-reactive protein (CRP) and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) during the preceding week. Response was defined as more than or equal to (≥) 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature less than or equal to (≤) 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%. |
| Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%. |
| Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | The CHAQ was used to assess physical ability, overall well- being and pain intensity experienced by participants. The CHAQ (disability and well-being) dimension consisted of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and other activities. Participants were graded for the response in four categories, ranging from 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Participant's pain intensity was assessed by parents and adult participants (18-20 years old) on a VAS scale of 0-100 mm (0 mm: no pain to 100: very severe pain). Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). For both scales, lower scores indicate increased functional ability. |
| Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | The Child Health Questionnaire - Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) instrument was used to measure HRQoL aged 5 to 18 years from a parent's perspective. This 14 concept questionnaire measured physical and psychosocial health of the participants on following points: physical functioning, role/social emotional, role/social behavior, role/social physical, bodily pain, general behavior, mental health, self-esteem, general health perception, change in health, parental impact - emotional, parental impact - time, family activities, and family cohesion. Total score ranged from 1-100. Increase in score represented improvement in overall well being of participants. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | EQ-5D HRQoL tool was used for participants above 12 years and EQ-5D proxy for 8-11 years. EQ-5D index scores range from -0.11 (worst possible health, worse than dead), to 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). Utility based EQ-5D questionnaire provides generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal based on 2 parts: EQ-5D descriptive system - 5 dimensions each with 3 levels (1:no, 2:moderate, 3:severe problem) on: mobility (1=0, 2=0.069, 3=0.314), self-care (1=0, 2=0.104, 3=0.214), usual activities (1=0, 2=0.036, 3=0.094), pain/discomfort (1=0, 2=0, 3=0.386) and anxiety/depression (1=0, 2=0.071, 3=0.2). EQ-5D Total score= 1-0.081-(score of level 2 in present)-0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents). EQ-5D total score: 1=high quality of life; -0.59 worst quality of life; and EQ-VAS - record participant's self-rated health on vertical, visual analog scale as '100=Best and 0=Worst imaginable health state'. Positive change from baseline score indicated improved health status. |
| Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of -CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38°C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%. |
| Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for Height to Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Growth velocity parameter height percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age. |
| Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Inactive disease was defined as no joints with active arthritis; no fever (body temperature ≤ 38 degree Celsius); no rheumatoid rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to SJIA; normal CRP, and a rating of no disease activity on the Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity (with a best possible score ≤10 mm on the VAS). |
| Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameters to Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Growth velocity parameter weight percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age. |
| Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Sleep patterns in children and adolescents aged between 11 and 15 years were determined using PDSS instrument to evaluate whether canakinumab helps in reducing sleepiness in children with SJIA. Participants were assessed on 8 items of PDSS, on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 - never, 1 - seldom, 2- sometimes, 3 - frequently and 4 - always). The sum of all the items was reported as total score with a range of 0-32. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). A positive change from baseline score indicated improvement. |
| Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6 worsening by more than 30%. For minimum adapted ACR paediatric scores, the last measurement recorded from the participant's previous study was considered baseline for the current study. |
| Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for BMI to Last Assessment of Study | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Growth velocity parameter BMI percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age. |
| Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Steroid tapering with oral steroids was allowed if the participant achieved an adapted ACR Paediatric 50 response and had no fever. A participant was considered to have tapered steroids successfully, if the steroid dose was reduced from baseline and the participant did not flare and maintained a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement. A participant was considered to have unsuccessfully tapered steroids if the steroid dose was reduced during the study but dose at last assessment was equal to or greater than dose at baseline or; if steroid dose was reduced but the participant did not maintain a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement. |
| Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | The canakinumab dose could be reduced from 4 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg in participants who were steroid-free, if requested by the treating physician and agreed by the sponsor. For treatment naive participants , dose reduction was allowed after the participant had received 6 months treatment with canakinumab. |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission | Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier | Clinical remission was defined as at least 6 months of inactive disease or at least 12 months of inactive disease on medication during the extension period. Participants with inactive disease for at least 6 months, but had loss of inactive disease before 12 months were also determined. |
Countries
Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted at 61 centres in 20 countries.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 147 participants from studies CACZ885G2301 (NCT number: NCT00889863) and CACZ885G2305 (NCT number: NCT00886769) and 123 canakinumab treatment- naive participants were enrolled into this extension study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treated: Group 1 (Discontinued From Core Study) Participants who discontinued from NCT00889863, received a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks unless discontinuation occurs. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose. | 33 |
| ACZ885 Treated: Group 2 (Completed Core Study) Participants who completed study NCT00889863, received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose. | 63 |
| ACZ885 Treated: Group 3 (Steroid Taper Failures in Core Study) Participants who failed to taper their steroid dose in NCT00889863; received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose. | 40 |
| ACZ885 Treated: Group 4 (Other Criteria) Participants who previously received canakinumab treatment in Studies NCT00889863 and NCT00886769, but did not fulfill the criteria for Group 1, 2 or 3, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose. | 11 |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive Participants who were canakinumab treatment- naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose. | 123 |
| Total | 270 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Administrative problems | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Participant no longer required drug | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect | 5 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 20 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | ACZ885 Treatment Naive | ACZ885 Treated: Group 4 (Other Criteria) | ACZ885 Treated: Group 3 (Steroid Taper Failures in Core Study) | ACZ885 Treated: Group 2 (Completed Core Study) | ACZ885 Treated: Group 1 (Discontinued From Core Study) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 12 -- <20 years | 80 participants | 40 participants | 2 participants | 10 participants | 17 participants | 11 participants |
| Age, Customized ≥ 20 years | 2 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants |
| Age, Customized 2 -- <4 years | 24 participants | 18 participants | 1 participants | 3 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants |
| Age, Customized 4 -- <6 years | 42 participants | 15 participants | 5 participants | 6 participants | 10 participants | 6 participants |
| Age, Customized 6 -- <12 years | 122 participants | 50 participants | 3 participants | 21 participants | 32 participants | 16 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 156 Participants | 75 Participants | 5 Participants | 23 Participants | 34 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 114 Participants | 48 Participants | 6 Participants | 17 Participants | 29 Participants | 14 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 124 / 147 | 91 / 123 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 47 / 147 | 40 / 123 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participants or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Treatment related AEs or SAEs were defined as AEs or SAEs that were suspected to be related to study treatment as per investigator.
Time frame: From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)
Population: The analysis was performed in safety set (SS), defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | SAEs | 40 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | Discontinuation due to any SAE | 13 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | AEs | 108 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | Treatment Related AEs | 44 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | Discontinuation due to any AE | 14 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | Treatment related SAEs | 1 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | Discontinuation due to any AE | 18 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | AEs | 137 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | SAEs | 47 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | Treatment related SAEs | 4 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | Discontinuation due to any SAE | 14 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE | Treatment Related AEs | 57 participants |
Number of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the Study
Immunogenicity assessment included determination of anti-canakinumab (ACZ885) antibodies in serum samples using BIAcore system.
Time frame: From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)
Population: The analysis was performed on the SS population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the Study | 0 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the Study | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study
Local injection site tolerability was assessed on the injection site. Each participant was classified into one of the following four categories: 1. no tolerability reactions at any time during the study, 2. mild reaction observed on at least one occasion but no moderate or severe reactions. 3. moderate reaction observed on at least one occasion but no severe reaction. 4. severe reaction observed on at least one occasion.
Time frame: From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)
Population: The analysis was performed in SS population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study | No tolerability reaction | 115 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study | Mild tolerability reaction | 6 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study | Moderate tolerability reaction | 2 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study | Severe tolerability reaction | 0 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study | Severe tolerability reaction | 0 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study | No tolerability reaction | 129 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study | Moderate tolerability reaction | 3 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study | Mild tolerability reaction | 15 participants |
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 1-100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 1-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of C-reactive protein (CRP) and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) during the preceding week. Response was defined as more than or equal to (≥) 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature less than or equal to (≤) 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 76.9 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 80.8 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 69.2 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 80.8 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 57.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 91.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 91.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 91.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 91.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 91.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 76.9 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 69.2 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 92.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 64.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 95.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 92.9 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 80 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 90 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit. For arm 'ACZ885 treatment naive: Group 2' there were no participants who had discontinued other biologics due to safety/tolerability issues.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 60 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 93.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 86.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 96.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 50 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 50 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 50 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 50 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 91.0 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 68.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 91.0 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 77.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 88.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 88.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 92.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 88.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 65.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 88.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 0 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 50 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 86.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 91.1 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥30 criteria | 92.2 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 76.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR 100 criteria | 67.8 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study
The CHAQ was used to assess physical ability, overall well- being and pain intensity experienced by participants. The CHAQ (disability and well-being) dimension consisted of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and other activities. Participants were graded for the response in four categories, ranging from 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Participant's pain intensity was assessed by parents and adult participants (18-20 years old) on a VAS scale of 0-100 mm (0 mm: no pain to 100: very severe pain). Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). For both scales, lower scores indicate increased functional ability.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Disability score | -0.375 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Pain Intensity score | -13 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Overall well-being score | -18 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Overall well-being score | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Disability score | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Pain Intensity score | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Overall well-being score | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Disability score | -0.125 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Pain Intensity score | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Disability score | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Pain Intensity score | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Overall well-being score | -10 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Overall well-being score | -28 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Disability score | -0.7143 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study | Pain Intensity score | -39 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study
EQ-5D HRQoL tool was used for participants above 12 years and EQ-5D proxy for 8-11 years. EQ-5D index scores range from -0.11 (worst possible health, worse than dead), to 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). Utility based EQ-5D questionnaire provides generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal based on 2 parts: EQ-5D descriptive system - 5 dimensions each with 3 levels (1:no, 2:moderate, 3:severe problem) on: mobility (1=0, 2=0.069, 3=0.314), self-care (1=0, 2=0.104, 3=0.214), usual activities (1=0, 2=0.036, 3=0.094), pain/discomfort (1=0, 2=0, 3=0.386) and anxiety/depression (1=0, 2=0.071, 3=0.2). EQ-5D Total score= 1-0.081-(score of level 2 in present)-0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents). EQ-5D total score: 1=high quality of life; -0.59 worst quality of life; and EQ-VAS - record participant's self-rated health on vertical, visual analog scale as '100=Best and 0=Worst imaginable health state'. Positive change from baseline score indicated improved health status.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with EQ-5D assessment in the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ- 5D Utility Index | 0.204 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ-VAS | 21 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ- 5D Utility Index | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ-VAS | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ- 5D Utility Index | 0.069 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ-VAS | 5 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ-VAS | 28 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ- 5D Utility Index | 0.2385 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ- 5D Utility Index | 0.228 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study | EQ-VAS | 30 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for BMI to Last Assessment of Study
Growth velocity parameter BMI percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for BMI to Last Assessment of Study | 1.08 Percentile |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for BMI to Last Assessment of Study | -0.77 Percentile |
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for Height to Last Assessment of Study
Growth velocity parameter height percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for Height to Last Assessment of Study | -0.01 Percentile |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for Height to Last Assessment of Study | 0 Percentile |
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameters to Last Assessment of Study
Growth velocity parameter weight percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameters to Last Assessment of Study | 0.1 Percentile |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameters to Last Assessment of Study | 0 Percentile |
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study
The Child Health Questionnaire - Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) instrument was used to measure HRQoL aged 5 to 18 years from a parent's perspective. This 14 concept questionnaire measured physical and psychosocial health of the participants on following points: physical functioning, role/social emotional, role/social behavior, role/social physical, bodily pain, general behavior, mental health, self-esteem, general health perception, change in health, parental impact - emotional, parental impact - time, family activities, and family cohesion. Total score ranged from 1-100. Increase in score represented improvement in overall well being of participants. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value).
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with HRQoL assessment in the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 psychosocial score | 3.8815 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 physical score | 14.0407 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 physical score | 0.6959 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 psychosocial score | 1.4004 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 physical score | 1.3716 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 psychosocial score | 0.7582 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 psychosocial score | 11.9798 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 physical score | 13.9255 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 psychosocial score | 9.3209 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study | CHQ-PF50 physical score | 18.8758 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study
Sleep patterns in children and adolescents aged between 11 and 15 years were determined using PDSS instrument to evaluate whether canakinumab helps in reducing sleepiness in children with SJIA. Participants were assessed on 8 items of PDSS, on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 - never, 1 - seldom, 2- sometimes, 3 - frequently and 4 - always). The sum of all the items was reported as total score with a range of 0-32. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). A positive change from baseline score indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analysed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point and with an assessment of PDSS score in the given visit..
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study | 1 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treated | Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study | 0.5 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study | 0 units on a scale |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study | -4.5 units on a scale |
Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg
The canakinumab dose could be reduced from 4 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg in participants who were steroid-free, if requested by the treating physician and agreed by the sponsor. For treatment naive participants , dose reduction was allowed after the participant had received 6 months treatment with canakinumab.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was done in FAS population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg | 9 participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg | 29 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg | 4 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg | 2 participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg | 18 participants |
Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of -CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38°C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit. For arm 'ACZ885 treated: Group 2 (Completed core study)' there were no Non-Responders participants available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 82.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 82.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥30 criteria | 82.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 76.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR 100 criteria | 58.8 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR 100 criteria | 17.6 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥30 criteria | 76.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 23.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 52.9 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 70.6 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR 100 criteria | 50 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥30 criteria | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 50 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 50 criteria | 90.9 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 90 criteria | 78.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR 100 criteria | 66.1 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥30 criteria | 92.6 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 | ACR ≥ 70 criteria | 87.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen
Steroid tapering with oral steroids was allowed if the participant achieved an adapted ACR Paediatric 50 response and had no fever. A participant was considered to have tapered steroids successfully, if the steroid dose was reduced from baseline and the participant did not flare and maintained a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement. A participant was considered to have unsuccessfully tapered steroids if the steroid dose was reduced during the study but dose at last assessment was equal to or greater than dose at baseline or; if steroid dose was reduced but the participant did not maintain a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants who were steroid users at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Steroid free | 36.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Successfully tapered | 27.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Unsuccessfully tapered | 18.2 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Did not taper | 18.2 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Steroid free | 55.6 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Did not taper | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Successfully tapered | 0 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Unsuccessfully tapered | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Did not taper | 36.8 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Successfully tapered | 21.1 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Unsuccessfully tapered | 18.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Steroid free | 23.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Steroid free | 25 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Successfully tapered | 25 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Did not taper | 25 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Unsuccessfully tapered | 25 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Did not taper | 31 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Unsuccessfully tapered | 11.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Successfully tapered | 23.9 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen | Steroid free | 33.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission
Clinical remission was defined as at least 6 months of inactive disease or at least 12 months of inactive disease on medication during the extension period. Participants with inactive disease for at least 6 months, but had loss of inactive disease before 12 months were also determined.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an assessment in the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission | At least 6 consecutive months of inactive disease | 42.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission | At least 12 consecutive months of inactive disease | 26.8 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission | Loss of inactive disease after 6 months | 8.9 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission | At least 6 consecutive months of inactive disease | 52.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission | At least 12 consecutive months of inactive disease | 42.9 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission | Loss of inactive disease after 6 months | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease
Inactive disease was defined as no joints with active arthritis; no fever (body temperature ≤ 38 degree Celsius); no rheumatoid rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to SJIA; normal CRP, and a rating of no disease activity on the Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity (with a best possible score ≤10 mm on the VAS).
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an assessment in the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | 39.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | 79.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | 12.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | 36.4 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | 50.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6 worsening by more than 30%. For minimum adapted ACR paediatric scores, the last measurement recorded from the participant's previous study was considered baseline for the current study.
Time frame: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Population: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 100 | 87.5 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 30 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 100 | 93.7 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treated | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 30 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 | 78.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 30 | 91.3 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 | 69.6 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 100 | 39.1 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 | 87 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 100 | 80 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 50 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 70 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 90 | 100 Percentage of participants |
| ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4 | Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study | ACR ≥ 30 | 100 Percentage of participants |