Skip to content

Body Composition Assessment in Healthy Full-term Neonates by Anthropometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography and Multiple-frequency Bio-impedance Analysis

Body Composition Assessment in Healthy Full-term Neonates by Anthropometry, Air Displacement Plethysmography (PeaPod) and Multiple-frequency Bio-impedance Analysis (BIA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00890344
Enrollment
40
Registered
2009-04-29
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2011-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neonates

Keywords

PeaPod, BIA, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Fat Mass, Total Body Water, Neonatology

Brief summary

Low birth weight and prematurity are associated with adverse metabolic outcome in adult life. Yet it remains to be determined whether this outcome is the consequence of the low birth weight per se, or of the catch up growth achieved in Neonatology units using an early, 'aggressive' nutritional management. As a matter of fact, 'aggressive' nutrition may promote fat mass, rather than lean body mass accretion. Assessment of body composition therefore is key to evaluate the efficacy of the nutritional management of these infants. Scarce data is, however, available in the literature about the body composition of healthy full-term neonates in the first few days of life. The aim of this study is to: 1. Evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of a safe and non invasive method of measurement of infant body composition by Air Displacement Plethysmography (PeaPod). Anthropometry and BIA will be used as the reference techniques to assess the accuracy of the PeaPod 2. Describe the body composition (fat mass, fat free mass) of healthy full-term neonates in the first few weeks of life 3. Obtain data on the total body water content of healthy full term infants from BIA.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 1 Days
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Full-term infants * 10th percentile for gestational age, according to the Audipog's growth chart

Exclusion criteria

* Congenital diseases * Chromosomal abnormalities * Any disease requiring intensive care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Accuracy and reproducibility of the PeaPod compared with Anthropometry and BIA. We defined that assessments are convergent if the difference between methods is less than 10 percent.August 2009

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Describe the body composition (fat mass, fat free mass) of healthy full-term neonates To get data on the total body water that we can refer to from BIA.August 2009

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026