Skip to content

Brachial Artery Peak Velocity Variation to Predict Fluid Responsiveness

Brachial Artery Peak Velocity Variation to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00890071
Enrollment
38
Registered
2009-04-29
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2009-04-30
Last updated
2009-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypotension, Shock

Keywords

Fluid responsiveness, Ultrasound, Cardiac output

Brief summary

The investigators designed this study to determine the predictive value for predicting fluid responsiveness of noninvasive evaluation of respiratory variation of peak velocity in brachial artery, in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure.

Detailed description

Predicting the hemodynamic response to fluid administration (or fluid responsiveness) in critical ill patients is still a matter of concern, since fluid overload could worse the clinical situation of these patients. Parameters of fluid responsiveness usually require an invasive monitoring (like arterial pulse pressure variation). We hypothesize that noninvasive evaluation of respiratory variation of peak velocity in brachial artery using Doppler ultrasound could provide a feasible estimation on fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure.

Interventions

500 ml of synthetic colloid (Voluven®, hydroxyethylstarch 6%; Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany) infused over 30 minutes

Sponsors

Hospital del SAS de Jerez
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with controlled mechanical ventilation, equipped with an indwelling radial artery catheter and for whom the decision to give fluids will be taken because the presence of one or more clinical signs of acute circulatory failure: * systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg (or a decrease \>50 mmHg in previously hypertensive patients) * the need of vasopressor drugs * oliguria (urine output \<0.5 ml/kg/min for at least 2 h) * tachycardia * delayed capillary refilling * the presence of skin mottling

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication for the volume administration: evidence of fluid overload and/or of hydrostatic pulmonary edema * Patients with instable cardiac rhythm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Predictive value of respiratory variation in brachial artery peak velocity before volume expansion assessed by ROC curve. We defined responser as patients that increased stroke volume index equal or more than 15% after fluid administration.immediately after volume expansion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the predictive value of pulse pressure variation for predicting hemodynamic response to fluid administration, comparing with the predictive value of respiratory variation of brachial artery peak velocity.immediately after fluid administration
Evaluate the predictive value of stroke volume variation for predicting hemodynamic response to fluid administration, comparing with the predictive value of respiratory variation of brachial artery peak velocity.immediately after volume expansion

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 2, 2026