Skip to content

Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) Vascular Access Patency Study

A Comparison Between the HeRO® Graft and Conventional Arteriovenous Grafts in Hemodialysis Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00890045
Enrollment
72
Registered
2009-04-29
Start date
2004-07-31
Completion date
2008-03-31
Last updated
2024-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Failure Chronic Requiring Hemodialysis

Keywords

Vascular access hemodialysis, ePTFE graft, Graft-eligible, Long-term vascular access for hemodialysis

Brief summary

Compare the HeRO Vascular Access Device to a conventional ePTFE graft.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the HeRO Vascular Access Device to a conventional ePTFE graft. It is hypothesized that HeRO patency will be comparable to the conventional ePTFE graft control.

Interventions

HeRO Vascular Access Device

DEVICEConventional ePTFE hemodialysis graft

Conventional ePTFE hemodialysis graft

Sponsors

CryoLife, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 22 years of age or older. 2. Male or non-pregnant female. 3. Life expectancy 2 years. 4. End-stage renal disease requiring an arm vascular prosthesis for dialysis access. 5. Ability to understand and provide written informed consent. 6. Willing and able to cooperate with follow-up examinations. 7. Subject's upper arm can be used for implant (Note: The GVAS device must be implanted in the upper arm only, but the Control group graft can be implanted in the upper or lower arm location.). 8. Able to follow a daily aspirin and/or other oral anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimen.

Exclusion criteria

1. Potential graft target artery less than 3 mm in diameter determined by any suitable preoperative measure. 2. Documented history of drug abuse within six months. 3. Planned concomitant surgical procedure or previous major surgery within 30 days, excluding vascular access related procedures. 4. Currently being treated with another investigational device or drug. 5. Known bleeding diathesis or hypercoagulable state. 6. Peripheral white blood cell count 1500/mm3 (1.5 K/mm3) or platelet counts 50,000/mm3 (50 K/mm3). 7. Degenerative connective tissue disease, e.g., Marfan's and Ehlers Danlos Syndrome. Subjects with Lupus Erythematosus may be included. 8. Subjects with known or suspected concomitant bacterial, fungal, viral, or parasitic infection. Subjects with Hepatitis B may be included. Subjects who are HIV + with CD4 count of \<200 are excluded. 9. Severe underlying co-morbidity or immediate life-threatening condition. 10. Subjects with any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, could preclude evaluation of response or completion of follow-up or affect subject safety. 11. Subjects who are candidates for autologous fistulas. 12. Subjects with scheduled renal transplant within the next 12 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Primary Patency6 months, 12 monthsPrimary patency was defined as the interval of time from access placement until any intervention designed to maintain or reestablish patency, access thrombosis, or the time of measurement of patency.
Percentage of Patients With Assisted Primary Patency6 months, 12 monthsAssisted primary patency was defined as the interval of time from access placement until access thrombosis or the time of measurement of patency, including intervening manipulations (i.e., surgical or endovascular interventions) designed to maintain the functionality of a patent access.
Percentage of Patients With Secondary Patency12 monthsSecondary patency was defined as the interval of time from access placement until access abandonment, thrombosis, or the time of patency measurements including intervening surgical or endovascular interventions designed to reestablish functionality in a thrombosed access.
Number of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse Events12 monthsSerious adverse events were defined as events that required hospitalization ≥24 hours, prolonged an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, were considered life-threatening, or resulted in death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adequacy of Dialysis12 monthsReported as Mean Kt/V, K= dialyzer clearance of urea, t= dialysis time, V=subject total body water

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
Conventional Arteriovenous ePTFE Graft Recipients
20
HeRO Group
HeRO Graft Recipients
52
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyDid not receive HeRO Graft02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalHeRO GroupControl Group
Access History
De Novo Access
24 participants19 participants5 participants
Access History
Re do Access
48 participants33 participants15 participants
Age, Continuous63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
History of Coronary artery disease
No
18 participants13 participants5 participants
History of Coronary artery disease
Yes
54 participants39 participants15 participants
History of Diabetes mellitus
No
24 participants18 participants6 participants
History of Diabetes mellitus
Yes
48 participants34 participants14 participants
History of Hypertension
No
4 participants3 participants1 participants
History of Hypertension
Yes
68 participants49 participants19 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
38 Participants24 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
26 Participants21 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
72 participants52 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants28 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants24 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 205 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 2019 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse Events

Serious adverse events were defined as events that required hospitalization ≥24 hours, prolonged an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, were considered life-threatening, or resulted in death.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsHeart failure1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsSite pain0 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsEmbolism0 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsTrauma to major veins, arteries, nerves0 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsSteal syndrome1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsInfection (non-BSIe)2 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsDevice/Implant procedure-related Bloodstream Infec1 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsDevice technical failure0 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsBleeding, hemorrhage or hematoma0 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsOther2 participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsDeath0 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsOther5 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsDeath1 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsDevice technical failure1 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsEmbolism2 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsHeart failure0 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsInfection (non-BSIe)2 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsTrauma to major veins, arteries, nerves1 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsSite pain1 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsSteal syndrome2 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsDevice/Implant procedure-related Bloodstream Infec3 participants
HeRO GroupNumber of Patients With Serious Device or Implant Procedure-related Adverse EventsBleeding, hemorrhage or hematoma6 participants
Primary

Percentage of Patients With Assisted Primary Patency

Assisted primary patency was defined as the interval of time from access placement until access thrombosis or the time of measurement of patency, including intervening manipulations (i.e., surgical or endovascular interventions) designed to maintain the functionality of a patent access.

Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

Population: The denominator represents the number of subjects who are not lost to follow-up, withdrew or died prior to that visit window close date.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupPercentage of Patients With Assisted Primary Patency6 Months88.8 percentage of participants patent
Control GroupPercentage of Patients With Assisted Primary Patency12 Months75.2 percentage of participants patent
HeRO GroupPercentage of Patients With Assisted Primary Patency6 Months86.2 percentage of participants patent
HeRO GroupPercentage of Patients With Assisted Primary Patency12 Months79.8 percentage of participants patent
Primary

Percentage of Patients With Primary Patency

Primary patency was defined as the interval of time from access placement until any intervention designed to maintain or reestablish patency, access thrombosis, or the time of measurement of patency.

Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

Population: The denominator represents the number of subjects who are not lost to follow-up, withdrew or died prior to that visit window close date. Note: Of the 52 subjects randomized to the HeRO Graft, 50 subjects were successfully implanted. Two implants were abandoned.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupPercentage of Patients With Primary Patency6 Months48.2 percentage of participants patent
Control GroupPercentage of Patients With Primary Patency12 Months30.6 percentage of participants patent
HeRO GroupPercentage of Patients With Primary Patency6 Months47.0 percentage of participants patent
HeRO GroupPercentage of Patients With Primary Patency12 Months34.8 percentage of participants patent
Primary

Percentage of Patients With Secondary Patency

Secondary patency was defined as the interval of time from access placement until access abandonment, thrombosis, or the time of patency measurements including intervening surgical or endovascular interventions designed to reestablish functionality in a thrombosed access.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: The denominator represents the number of subjects who are not lost to follow-up, withdrew or died prior to that visit window close date.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupPercentage of Patients With Secondary Patency6 Months58.4 percentage of participants patent
Control GroupPercentage of Patients With Secondary Patency12 Months58.4 percentage of participants patent
HeRO GroupPercentage of Patients With Secondary Patency6 Months76.7 percentage of participants patent
HeRO GroupPercentage of Patients With Secondary Patency12 Months67.6 percentage of participants patent
Secondary

Adequacy of Dialysis

Reported as Mean Kt/V, K= dialyzer clearance of urea, t= dialysis time, V=subject total body water

Time frame: 12 months

Population: The denominator represents the number of subjects who are not lost to follow-up, withdrew or died prior to that visit window close date.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupAdequacy of Dialysis1.7 Kt/VStandard Deviation 0.4
HeRO GroupAdequacy of Dialysis1.6 Kt/VStandard Deviation 0.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026