Skip to content

CopiOs® Pericardium Membrane for Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

Prospective, Multi-Center Study of CopiOs® Pericardium Membrane With Puros® Cancellous Particulate Allograft for Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00889265
Enrollment
51
Registered
2009-04-28
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2014-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Ridge Defect

Keywords

Alveolar Bone Augmentation, Implant Surgery, Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR), Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR), Bone Graft, Periodontal Surgery

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multi-center study to evaluate the use of CopiOs Pericardium Membrane, a bovine xenograft, with use of Puros Cancellous Particulate Allograft, for the augmentation of localized alveolar ridge defects on either the maxilla or mandible.

Detailed description

The study will evaluate the use of CopiOs Pericardium Membrane (CopiOs Pericardium), a bovine xenograft, with the use of Puros Cancellous Particulate Allograft (Puros Cancellous), a mineralized allograft, for the augmentation of localized alveolar ridge defects in edentulous sites. The purpose of the study will be to determine placement time, ease of use, stability, esthetics and to clinically evaluate the efficacy of the list products. A biopsy will be taken from a subset of the patient population, at one investigational site, to evaluate the grafted site's formation of new bone. The study hypothesis is that if CopiOs Pericardium and Puros Cancellous are used, the a single, localized alveolar ridge defect will clinically improve at an edentulous site.

Interventions

DEVICECopiOs Pericardium Membrane

CopiOs Pericardium, Puros Cancellous

Sponsors

Zimmer Dental
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Zimmer Biomet
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, of any ethnicity, between 18 and 99 years of age * Health status of P1(ASA I) or P2 (ASA II), as classified by the American Academy of Anesthesiologists * Able to communicate with the investigator and read, understand, and sign the informed consent form * No evidence of active moderate or severe periodontitis * Must be available for multiple follow-up visits for the duration of the study * The study site must exhibit a partially edentulous ridge of the maxilla or mandible with at least one tooth-span in length and less than 5.5 mm in its smallest buccolingual dimension as measured by ridge-mapping calipers (#RIDGE-CALIPER, Salvin Dental Specialties, Inc., Charlotte, NC).

Exclusion criteria

* Inability or failure to maintain adequate oral hygiene * Women who are bread-feeding, pregnant, or who intend to become pregnant during this study period. Women of childbearing potential should be practicing a medically accepted method of birth control * Patients with unstable systemic diseases * Patients with compromised immune system (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, etc.) or unstable bleeding disorder * Patients with active infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis, HEV, etc.) * Patients with a mental disability that may hinder participation in the study (e.g. inability to follow through with oral hygiene instructions, postoperative instructions, follow-up commitments, etc.) * Patients taking steroid medications or undergoing other immunosuppressive therapy * Radiation, cancer therapy, and/or radiation specifically at the oral cavity within the last 6 months * History of previous ridge augmentation at the site of interest * Augmentation sites with localized pathology * Patient who has participated in a clinical trial within 30 days of being enrolled in this study, is currently enrolled in another study, or plans to enroll in another study before the completion of of this study. * Unresolved oral pathologies (e.g. periodontal disease, caries, etc.) * Medications or conditions contraindicated for bone regeneration: methotrexate, corticosteroids, history of bisphosphonate use, cyclosporine-A, etc. * Patients who have more than a minimal tobacco use (e.g. \>10 cigarettes per day) * Other conditions the investigator may feel would inhibit the patient from being a good candidate for this study or which are contraindicated in the Directions for Use. * Note: Careful consideration should be given to alternative therapies prior to performing bone grafting in patients who have severe endocrine-induced bone diseases (e.g.hyperparathyroidism), or who are undergoing current therapy with drugs that intervene in calcium metabolism.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Horizontal Ridge Widths From Baseline to 6 Months6 monthsThe primary outcome measure of the study was the average change in ridge width from baseline (pre operative/pre grafting) to 6 months post surgery. The ridge measurements were taken using ridge mapping calipers and recorded for each patient at baseline and 6 months. Baseline measurements were taken at the site of greatest ridge width deficiency as determined by the investigator and repeated at the same location for subsequent measurements. A radiographic template with a radiopaque foil was utilized to standardize clinical and radiographic measurements for each patient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Wound Healing Index at 6 Months6 monthsScore Description 1. Uneventful wound healing with no gingival edema, erythema, suppuration, patient discomfort or flap dehiscence 2. Uneventful wound healing with slight gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort or flap dehiscence but no suppuration 3. Poor wound healing with significant gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort or flap dehiscence with suppuration

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was from June 2009 to February 2011. Subjects were recruited from patients attenting the PI's clinic and had one edentulous site which required lateral ridge augmentation prior to dental implant placement.

Pre-assignment details

All enrolled participants took part in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CopiOs Pericardium
Subject's study site must exhibit a partially edentulous ridge of the maxilla or mandible with at least one tooth-span in length and less than 5.5mm in its smallest buccolingual dimension as measured by ridge-mapping calipers. CopiOs Pericardium Membrane: CopiOs Pericardium Membrane (CopiOs Pericardium), a bovine xenograft 20mm x 30mm; Puros Cancellous Particulate Allograft (Puros Cancellous) 2 cubic centimeters (cc) of small particle (250-1000um).
51
Total51

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCopiOs Pericardium
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
43 Participants
Age, Continuous49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Region of Enrollment
United States
51 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Horizontal Ridge Widths From Baseline to 6 Months

The primary outcome measure of the study was the average change in ridge width from baseline (pre operative/pre grafting) to 6 months post surgery. The ridge measurements were taken using ridge mapping calipers and recorded for each patient at baseline and 6 months. Baseline measurements were taken at the site of greatest ridge width deficiency as determined by the investigator and repeated at the same location for subsequent measurements. A radiographic template with a radiopaque foil was utilized to standardize clinical and radiographic measurements for each patient.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CopiOs PericardiumChange in Horizontal Ridge Widths From Baseline to 6 Months2.61 mmStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Mean Wound Healing Index at 6 Months

Score Description 1. Uneventful wound healing with no gingival edema, erythema, suppuration, patient discomfort or flap dehiscence 2. Uneventful wound healing with slight gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort or flap dehiscence but no suppuration 3. Poor wound healing with significant gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort or flap dehiscence with suppuration

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CopiOs PericardiumMean Wound Healing Index at 6 Months1.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026