Skip to content

Clinical Performance and Wear Mechanism of Hot-Pressed Ceramic Crowns

Clinical Performance and Wear Mechanism of Hot-Pressed Ceramic Crowns

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00889239
Enrollment
30
Registered
2009-04-28
Start date
2004-05-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2015-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ceramic and Dental Enamel Wear

Keywords

ceramic, wear rate, opposing enamel

Brief summary

The objectives of this study are to characterize the clinical performance and wear mechanisms of all-ceramic posterior crowns. The wear rate of all-ceramic crowns and opposing enamel in selected patients will be quantified. The relationship of each subject's maximum clenching force and wear rate will also be analyzed.

Detailed description

High strength ceramics have been used in dentistry for constructing fixed partial denture. Their advantages are their acceptable fracture resistance, excellent biocompatibility, moderate opacity, etc. Because the increase in demand for more esthetic restoration, various ceramic materials have been used as a core material for several all-ceramic systems. Their properties have been investigated extensively in many in vitro studies. Currently, there are not much results regarding clinical performance and wear mechanism of ceramic-based prosthesis and more information are required for future research.

Interventions

OTHERlithia-disilicate-based crown

all-ceramic crown

Sponsors

Thailand Research Fund
CollaboratorOTHER
Mahidol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Occlusion: At least 20 remaining teeth for each patient, and at least one posterior endodontically treated tooth with natural opposing teeth * Bruxism: No evidence based on an intraoral examination * Dental history: No evidence of either moderate or severe periodontal disease * Medical history: Good to excellent general health

Exclusion criteria

* Periodontal status: Pocket depth greater than 4 mm * Occlusion: * Evidence of bruxism or excessive biting or clenching force * Abutment tooth that opposes a removable partial denture * Abutment tooth for fixed partial dentures * Gingival recession of an abutment tooth more than 1 mm from the cementoenamel junction * Tooth with first or second degree of tooth mobility * Tooth with extensive carious lesions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical performance5 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
wear rate2 years

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026