Skip to content

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) For Parkinson's Disease: Caudal Zona Incerta Versus Subthalamic Nucleus

The Clinical Effect of Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN-DBS) Versus Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Caudal Zona Incerta (cZI-DBS) in Patients With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00888095
Enrollment
70
Registered
2009-04-24
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2009-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

deep brain stimulation, caudal Zona incerta, Nucleus subthalamicus, Parkinson's disease, randomized, blinded, Movement disorder

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of two different targets of deep brain stimulation: caudal Zona incerta and Nucleus subthalamicus. The present study will investigate the effects of DBS using a blind, randomized and stratified design in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Detailed description

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a severe neurological movement disorder comprising the triad of symptoms of bradykinesia, rigidity and tremor. It can be effectively treated with dopaminergic replacement therapy in the early course of the disease; however, after 5-10 years medical therapy is insufficient in the majority of patients. Since the early 90s the implantation of electrodes into the Nucleus subthalamicus (STN), (deep brain stimulation; DBS) has been established. DBS in PD- patients provides a definite and longlasting relief of motor symptoms and impaired quality of life compared to optimized medical treatment (Deuschl et al. 2006). Conventionally, electrodes are implanted into STN but other targets such as the pedunculopontine nucleus or the Zona incerta (ZI) have been reported to be useful. Importantly, the ZI has a key role in connection loops from the basal ganglia, thalamic regions and cortex. Retrospective studies of DBS-treated patients show relief of symptoms in DBS- treated PD patients, with the contacts of the electrodes being located to the ZI (Voges et al., 2002; Hamel et al., 2003a, 2003b). However, no prospective randomized studies analysing the effect of bilateral DBS comparing the targets of the caudal ZI (cZI) and STN are available. Therefore, the present study will investigate the effect and tolerance of DBS in both targets in a blind, randomized and stratified design in a total of 70 PD patients (see below for inclusion end exclusion criteria). The impairment of movement and quality of life will be assessed via established scales. Effects, tolerance and side effects of DBS will be monitored closely and re-assessed for a period of twelve months. Primary study criteria include UPDRS-III and quality of life.

Interventions

PROCEDUREdeep brain stimulation

electrode implantation in either STN or cZI

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (criteria of the British Brain Bank: L-DOPA- or Apomorphin-sensitivity of more than 30% or typical Parkinsonian tremor while resting) * duration of disease \> 18 months * age between 18 and 75 Jahren * relevant disablement in daily activities/ impairment despite medical mental therapy * informed and signed consent of the patient

Exclusion criteria

* major depression with suicidal thoughts (Becks Depressions Inventory-Score \> 25); depressions in the past are no exclusion criterion * Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-score \< 130 * stereotactic brain operations in the past * significant brain atrophy * increased bleeding tendency * reduced infection defense * relevant cerebrovascular disease * acute psychosis (benign and/or hallucinations in the past are no exclusion criterion) * a physical and/or mental illness which is likely to affect the study procedures in a negative way (e.g., cancer with reduced life expectancy) * abuse of drugs or alcohol * female study participants of child- bearing age without adequate contraception * women during pregnancy or lactation * no sufficient knowledge of the German language to answer the questionnaires * other surgical contraindications * participation in another clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement of scores (UPDRS III, PDQ-39) in Stim-ON and Med-OFF in a standard clinical check-up (CAPSIT) 12 and 24 months after operation compared to primary inclusion examination24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in dysarthria, other symptoms (subitems of UPDRS-III), dyskinesia (UPDRS-IV), impairment of gait, on-off fluctuations24 months

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026