Skip to content

Non-interventional Observational Study on the Influence of Pramipexole on Sensory Symptoms of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)

Non-interventional Observational Study on the Influence of Pramipexole (PPX) on Sensory Symptoms of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00887289
Enrollment
1504
Registered
2009-04-23
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2014-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Restless Legs Syndrome

Brief summary

The main goal of this open-label, prospective, non-controlled, non-interventional post marketing surveillance study is to evaluate how pramipexole treatment works when applied in actual practice. In actual practice patients who would have been excluded in the clinical registration studies of pramipexole in moderate to severe primary Restless Legs Syndrome (i.e. those with certain disease histories, co-morbidities and/or demographic characteristics) will also be treated with pramipexole. Thus, during this post marketing surveillance study additional information on the efficacy and safety of pramipexole in those patients will be obtained. The objectives of this post marketing surveillance study are: * To investigate the influence of Sifrol® (pramipexole) treatment on unpleasant sensory symptoms of Restless Legs Syndrome as measured with the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. * To assess if improvement of sensory symptoms correlates with overall Restless Legs Syndrome severity (International Restless Legs Syndrome Scale for Severity) and with secondary symptoms like sleeping problems and daytime tiredness (items 1 & 6 from Restless Legs Syndrome-6). * To evaluate if the treatment effect of Sifrol on overall Restless Legs Syndrome severity (International Restless Legs Syndrome Scale for Severity) differs between patients with high pain scores and patients with lower pain scores. * To compare General Practitioner and neurologist sites patient populations in terms of demographics, Restless Legs Syndrome severity at Visit 1 and treatment outcomes at Visit 3. * To evaluate the development of behavioural changes under pramipexole treatment.

Detailed description

Study Design:

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of primary moderate to severe Restless Legs Syndrome. 2. Patients who are planned to be treated with Sifrol® (pramipexole) and where the decision of treatment is made independent of the patients' inclusion into this post marketing surveillance study. 3. Male or female patients aged at least 18 years. 4. Written informed consent by the patient for study participation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any contraindications according to the Summary of Product Characteristics: hypersensitivity to pramipexole or to any of the excipients. 2. Previous or ongoing treatment with Sifrol® (pramipexole). 3. Previous or ongoing treatment with dopamine receptor agonists.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Summary of Change From Baseline in Total Sum of McGill Pain Questionnaire to Visit 3Baseline to Visit 3Change in Total Sum Score of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (worst pain). A negative change is an improvement of pain, a positive change a worsening of pain.
Summary of Change From Baseline in Total Sum of McGill Pain Questionnaire to Visit 3 for Patients Treated by General PractitionerBaseline to Visit 3Change in Total Sum Score of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (worst pain). A negative change is an improvement of pain, a positive change a worsening of pain.
Summary of Change From Baseline in Total Sum of McGill Pain Questionnaire to Visit 3 for Patients Treated by NeurologistBaseline to Visit 3Change in Total Sum Score of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (worst pain). A negative change is an improvement of pain, a positive change a worsening of pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Summary of Change From Baseline in Restless Legs Syndrome Severity Scale With 6 Questions to Visit 3Baseline to Visit 3Change in RLS-6 at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (best) to 20 (worst) A negative change is an improvement of RLS-6, a positive change a worsening of RLS-6.
Summary of Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Scale for Severity to Visit 3Baseline to Visit 3Change in IRLS at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (best) to 40 (worst) A negative change is an improvement of IRLS, a positive change a worsening of IRLS.
Behavioural Changes During TreatmentBaseline to Visit 3Number of patients with occurence of behavioural changes in terms of impulse control disorders

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pramipexole
0.088 mg every day (qd), titration up to 0.54 mg qd possible
1,504
Total1,504

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event27
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy14
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up8
Overall StudyOther20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPramipexole
Age, Continuous65.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Gender
Female
1008 participants
Gender
Male
490 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1,504
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 1,504

Outcome results

Primary

Summary of Change From Baseline in Total Sum of McGill Pain Questionnaire to Visit 3

Change in Total Sum Score of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (worst pain). A negative change is an improvement of pain, a positive change a worsening of pain.

Time frame: Baseline to Visit 3

Population: Full analysis set, no imputation technique was applied

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleSummary of Change From Baseline in Total Sum of McGill Pain Questionnaire to Visit 3-14.48 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 9.69
Primary

Summary of Change From Baseline in Total Sum of McGill Pain Questionnaire to Visit 3 for Patients Treated by General Practitioner

Change in Total Sum Score of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (worst pain). A negative change is an improvement of pain, a positive change a worsening of pain.

Time frame: Baseline to Visit 3

Population: All patients of the full analysis set treated by a general practitioner, no imputation technique was applied

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleSummary of Change From Baseline in Total Sum of McGill Pain Questionnaire to Visit 3 for Patients Treated by General Practitioner-15.87 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 9.39
Primary

Summary of Change From Baseline in Total Sum of McGill Pain Questionnaire to Visit 3 for Patients Treated by Neurologist

Change in Total Sum Score of McGill Pain Questionnaire at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (worst pain). A negative change is an improvement of pain, a positive change a worsening of pain.

Time frame: Baseline to Visit 3

Population: All patients of the full analysis set treated by a neurologist, no imputation technique was applied

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleSummary of Change From Baseline in Total Sum of McGill Pain Questionnaire to Visit 3 for Patients Treated by Neurologist-12.13 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 9.73
Secondary

Behavioural Changes During Treatment

Number of patients with occurence of behavioural changes in terms of impulse control disorders

Time frame: Baseline to Visit 3

Population: Full analysis set, no imputation technique was applied

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PramipexoleBehavioural Changes During Treatment8 participants
Secondary

Summary of Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Scale for Severity to Visit 3

Change in IRLS at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (best) to 40 (worst) A negative change is an improvement of IRLS, a positive change a worsening of IRLS.

Time frame: Baseline to Visit 3

Population: Full analysis set, no imputation technique was applied

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleSummary of Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Scale for Severity to Visit 3-17.71 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 8.86
Secondary

Summary of Change From Baseline in Restless Legs Syndrome Severity Scale With 6 Questions to Visit 3

Change in RLS-6 at Visit 3 to baseline. The sum scores can have values in the range from 0 (best) to 20 (worst) A negative change is an improvement of RLS-6, a positive change a worsening of RLS-6.

Time frame: Baseline to Visit 3

Population: Full analysis set (FAS)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PramipexoleSummary of Change From Baseline in Restless Legs Syndrome Severity Scale With 6 Questions to Visit 3-1.63 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.98

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026