Skip to content

rTMS To The Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex For Patients With Subjective Idiopathic Tinnitus. A Pilot Study

rTMS To The Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex For Patients With Subjective Idiopathic Tinnitus. A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00886938
Enrollment
12
Registered
2009-04-23
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2014-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Keywords

tinnitus

Brief summary

The neurological basis of tinnitus is uncertain when there is no evidence of damage to the peripheral auditory system. However, neuroimaging studies of tinnitus patients show hyperactivity in several cortical regions, especially the auditory cortices and middle temporal regions. A potentially promising treatment modality for tinnitus is repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). rTMS involves the application of frequent, repeated magnetic stimuli to the skull to induce electrical activity in the underlying cortical areas of the brain. When the magnetic device is placed on the skull, the resultant magnetic field passes through the skull and induces a small secondary current in the cortex. It has been hypothesized that the effect of the frequency used in rTMS differentially influences cortical activity with low-frequency (1Hz) stimulation decreasing and high-frequency stimulation (10-20 Hz) increasing cortical activity. Currently, reports on treating tinnitus with rTMS have focused on low-frequency stimulation of the left auditory cortex, an area that has been demonstrated to be hyperactive in tinnitus. The benefits of low-frequency auditory cortex stimulation are time limited however. Converging data implicate structures of the brain that are important for mood and attention as playing a role in the maintenance of tinnitus; suggesting an alternative rTMS treatment approach that targets these structures. A growing number of studies demonstrate involvement of the prefrontal cortex in the generation and maintenance of tinnitus. rTMS stimulation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in association with stimulation in the temporoparietal cortex has been shown to increase the durability of the TPC stimulation. The independent effect of rTMS stimulation to the DLPFC is not known. Studies in depression suggest that increasing the intensity and duration of stimulation has beneficial treatment effects. However, the field is new and more work is needed to assess the effectiveness of this treatment, predictors and correlates of response, and safety. Herein, we propose an open-label pilot study investigating the effectiveness of rTMS stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, an area known to be important for mood and attention, in the treatment of tinnitus

Detailed description

See description above.

Interventions

DEVICERepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), pilot study

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, pilot study

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must be between the ages of 18 and 60 years. * Subjective, idiopathic, troublesome, unilateral or bilateral, non-pulsatile tinnitus of ≥ 6 month's duration.. * Tinnitus handicap score of 38 or greater on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. * Must be able to understand, speak, read, and write English proficiently * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with tinnitus related to cochlear implantation, retrocochlear lesion, or other known anatomic/structural lesions of the ear and temporal bone. Patients with a history of stapedectomy and insertion of implant may be included if their prosthesis is magnetically safe (MRI compatible up to and including 3T). Patient must be able to provide documentation from surgeon regarding manufacturer information of prosthesis before they will be considered into study. * Hypersensitive to noises (hyperacusis) * Patients with cardiac pacemakers; intracardiac lines; implanted medication pumps; implanted electrodes in the brain; other implanted electrical or magnetic medical devices; or other intracranial metal objects or shrapnel, with the exception of dental fillings and MRI compatible stapedectomies or any other contraindication for MRI scan * Patients with additional significant neurological disorders including increased intracranial pressure, brain mass, epileptic seizures (or family history of epileptic seizures), history of stroke, transient ischemic attack within 2 years, cerebral aneurysm, Huntington's chorea or multiple sclerosis. * Patients with an acute or unstable medical condition including all patients with any significant heart disease, heart murmur, pneumonia, acute GI bleed, uncontrolled hypertension, or other disorders which would require stabilization prior to initiation of transcranial magnetic stimulation. * Active alcohol and/or drug dependence or history of alcohol and/or drug dependence within the last year. * Patients with clinical depression as evidenced by a score of 18 or greater on the Beck Depression Inventory98 or who or, in the opinion of the psychiatric sub-investigator demonstrates active mood symptoms that meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for Major Depressive Disorder * Patients with psychological illness or trauma which would prohibit participation in the study. * Female patients of child-bearing potential, unless sterilized or using an appropriate form of birth control acceptable to the research team. * Currently breastfeeding * Currently pregnant * Patients will be excluded if a motor threshold cannot be elicited * Patients who or are taking over-the-counter or prescribed medication administered for the treatment of any psychiatric or neurologic disorder or any other known CNS active drugs, including herbal, over-the-counter, and homeopathic medications, MAOIs, other antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers. * Patients whose ability to give informed consent is in question * Undiagnosed symptomatic hypertension: (for this study defined as systolic blood pressures above 140 mm or diastolic pressure above 90 mm). Subject will be referred to their PCP and not allowed to continue in screening without a note from the PCP stating that they are under his care and have been asymptomatic and with subject's hypertension controlled for at least 3 months. * Undiagnosed asymptomatic hypertension: (for this study defined as systolic blood pressures above 140 mm or diastolic pressure above 90 mm). Subject will be allowed to continue in the screening process at the discretion of the PI. However, the subject will be referred to his PCP and not allowed to start treatment without a note from his PCP stating that either he was evaluated and his blood

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Change (Baseline-End of Treatment) Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)0,4 weeksPatient self-reported Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) The mean change (95% CI) in THI scores (Baseline - End of Treatment). Measures tinnitus severity, or how much tinnitus interrupts their life. The THI scores range from 0-100. 0 being no interruption, 100 being severe interruption in their life from tinnitus.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment Period: 06/2009-08/2010 Subjects recruited from Washington University Clinics and from Washington University Volunteers for Health.

Pre-assignment details

Screening for Motor Threshold with rTMS magnet resulted in screen failure for one subject. Screening for psych history with psychiatrist screen failed one subject. And another subject admitted to falsifying his information, he was withdrawn from the study during screening.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
rTMS
rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for patients with tinnitus. Treated at 110% of Motor Threshold
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicrTMS
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Age, Continuous51 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Average Change (Baseline-End of Treatment) Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)

Patient self-reported Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) The mean change (95% CI) in THI scores (Baseline - End of Treatment). Measures tinnitus severity, or how much tinnitus interrupts their life. The THI scores range from 0-100. 0 being no interruption, 100 being severe interruption in their life from tinnitus.

Time frame: 0,4 weeks

Population: Total number of participants completing the full four weeks of treatment, according to protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
rTMSAverage Change (Baseline-End of Treatment) Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)10.7 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026