Skip to content

Comparison of a Multifocal Contact Lens to a Traditional Multifocal Contact Lens

Lotrafilcon B Multifocal Evaluations - Comparison to a Traditional Multifocal in Higher Spectacle Adds

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00886119
Enrollment
48
Registered
2009-04-22
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2012-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Brief summary

The purpose of the trial is to compare the performance of two multifocal contact lens systems/products in established presbyopic subjects.

Interventions

Silicone hydrogel, soft, multifocal contact lens for daily wear use

DEVICEOmafilcon A multifocal contact lens

Hydrogel, soft, multifocal contact lens for daily wear use

Sponsors

CIBA VISION
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be at least 35 years of age. * Best-corrected visual acuity of at least 20/40 in each eye. * Spectacle add from +1.50D and +2.50D (inclusive). * Able to be fit in available study sphere powers (Plano to -4.00D). * Currently wearing soft contact lenses at least 5 days a week. * Other protocol inclusion /

Exclusion criteria

may apply.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual AcuityAfter 1 week of wearTested while reading charts distant to the subject with both eyes together in normal lighting. This outcome is measured in logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A logMAR acuity of 0.0 equates to 20/20 Snellen acuity and is considered normal. Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision and negative values denote better visual acuity.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Two participants were enrolled but not dispensed due to failing inclusion/exclusion criteria. These participants were included in the Actual Enrollment calculation, but not Participant Flow or Baseline Characteristics calculations.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall
This reporting group includes all enrolled and dispensed subjects.
46
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1Did not meet inclusion criteria10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall
Age Continuous49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 460 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Corrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity

Tested while reading charts distant to the subject with both eyes together in normal lighting. This outcome is measured in logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A logMAR acuity of 0.0 equates to 20/20 Snellen acuity and is considered normal. Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision and negative values denote better visual acuity.

Time frame: After 1 week of wear

Population: Per Protocol. Analysis excluded major protocol deviations as determined by masked review.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BCorrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity0.00 logMARStandard Deviation 0.07
Omafilcon ACorrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity-0.02 logMARStandard Deviation 0.06

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026