Skip to content

Acupuncture in Herpes Zoster Neuralgia (ACUZoster)

Analgetic Effectiveness of Acupuncture When Compared to a Standardised Analgesic Regimen in the Treatment of Herpes Zoster Neuralgia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00885586
Acronym
ACUZoster
Enrollment
68
Registered
2009-04-22
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2018-04-05
Last updated
2018-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Herpes Zoster, Postherpetic Neuralgia, Pain

Keywords

herpes zoster, neuropathic pain, acupuncture, randomised controlled trial, acute herpes zoster

Brief summary

Symptoms that herald herpes zoster include pruritus, dysesthesia and pain along the distribution of the involved dermatome. The most distressing symptom is typically pain and the most feared complication is postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), the persistence of pain long after rash healing. PHN is defined as pain persisting more than 3 months after the rash has healed. Both, the acute pain associated with herpes zoster and the chronic pain of PHN, have multiple adverse effects on health-related quality of life. The primary objective of the trial presented is to investigate whether a 4 week semi-standardised acupuncture is non-inferior (first step) or superior (second step) to (a) the anticonvulsive drug gabapentin and (b) sham laser acupuncture in the treatment of pain associated with herpes zoster in addition to standardised analgesics. Secondary objectives include an assessment of the change of sensoric function, of long-term effectiveness, the occurrence of PHN and an evaluation of several pain specific questionnaires

Interventions

Laser irradiation is faked, approaching a non-functioning laser pen.

Patients in this arm are treated individually with gabapentine 900 mg/d - 3600 mg/d, according to the recommended scheme given by the manufacturer

PROCEDUREAcupuncture

The needle acupuncture technique used in this trial is performed according the traditional way (TCM) using expendable needles.

Sponsors

Dominik Irnich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of acute HZ * Pain intensity \> 30 mm visual analog scale

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or other diseases influencing the peripheral sensibility (e.g., polyneuropathia, chronic pain syndromes, cutaneous irritations i.e. burns) * Patients under age * Uncompliance * Pregnancy or lactation * Surgery within the last 3 month * Severe heart/lung/kidney disease * Diseases influencing the quality of life * Psychiatric diseases (e.g., depression, schizophrenia, dementia) * Chronic intake of analgesics, neuroleptics, antidepressants, corticoids, alpha-agonists * Acupuncture, transdermal electric neurostimulation or other Complementary and Alternative Medicine treatment within the last 4 weeks * Contraindications according to the summary of product informations against analgesic treatment (i.e., metamizol, paracetamol, tramadol, morphine) or the investigational medicinal products (gabapentine, acupuncture needles)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Alteration of pain intensity after treatment5 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quantitative sensory testing6 months

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 2, 2026