Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of BMN 110 in Subjects With Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA

A Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of BMN 110 in Subjects With Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (Morquio Syndrome)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00884949
Enrollment
20
Registered
2009-04-21
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2014-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

MPS IV A

Keywords

Mucopolysaccharidosis IV type A, MPS IV Type A, Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA, MPS IVA, Morquio A Syndrome, Lysosomal Storage Disorder, LSD, N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase, N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfate sulfatase, galactose-6-sulfatase, GALNS, enzyme replacement therapy, ERT

Brief summary

This multicenter, open-label study is designed to assess safety, dose-response using pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) measures, and clinical efficacy of BMN 110 in subjects between 5 and 18 years of age, diagnosed with Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (MPS IVA).

Interventions

Subjects will receive a weekly 4- to 5-hour intravenous infusion of BMN 110 in 3 consecutive 12-week dosing intervals, using the following regimen: * Weeks 1-12: 0.1 mg/kg/week * Weeks 13-24: 1.0 mg/kg/week * Weeks 25-36: 2.0 mg/kg/week Subjects who complete the 36-week Dose-Escalation Period will have the option to continue drug treatment for an additional 36 to 48 weeks. Subjects continuing on treatment after the Dose-Escalation period will receive weekly 4- to 5-hour intravenous infusions of BMN 110 at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg/week.

Sponsors

BioMarin Pharmaceutical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented history of reduced GALNS activity relative to the normal range of the laboratory performing the assay, or documented result of molecular genetic testing confirming diagnosis of MPS IVA. * Willing and able to provide written, signed informed consent, or in the case of subjects under the age of 16 years, provide written assent (if required) and written informed consent by a legally authorized representative after the nature of the study has been explained, and prior to any research-related procedures. * Between 5 and 18 years of age, inclusive. * Sexually active subjects must be willing to use an acceptable method of contraception while participating in the study. * Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and be willing to have additional pregnancy tests during the study. * Willing to perform all study procedures as physically possible.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). * Has known hypersensitivity to BMN 110 or its excipients. * Pregnant or breastfeeding at Screening or planning to become pregnant (self or partner) at any time during the study. * Use of any investigational product or investigational medical device within 30 days prior to Screening, or requirement for any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments. * Concurrent disease or condition that would interfere with study participation or safety, including, but not limited to, symptomatic cervical spine instability. * Any condition that, in the view of the Principal Investigator (PI), places the subject at high risk of poor treatment compliance or of not completing the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsEntire Study, through week 84The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of weekly infusions of BMN 110 administered in escalating doses to subjects with MPS IVA. The safety variable incidence of TEAE is summarized.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in 6MWTBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72Change from baseline in meters in 6-minute Walk Test. As a measure of endurance, a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed according to the American Thoracic Society Guidelines. Patients were instructed to walk as far as possible in 6 minutes.
Change From Baseline in 3MSCTBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72Change from baseline in the 3-minute Stair Climb Test. Patients walked up stairs that have a railing, which could be used for support, for 3 minutes, with the number of stairs climbed recorded. The test result was the number of steps climbed per minute.
Percent Change From Baseline in uKSBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 72Percent Change from baseline in Normalized Urine KS. The percent change was calculated (Week X value - baseline value)/baseline value \*100%
Percent Change From Baseline in MVVBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 72Percent Change from baseline in Maximum Voluntary Ventilation.
Percent Change From Baseline in FVCBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 72Percent Change from baseline in Forced Vital Capacity.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BMN 110
Dose-Escalation Period:
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Weeks 1-12: 0.1 mg/kg/WeekAdverse Event1
Weeks 1-12: 0.1 mg/kg/WeekWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBMN 110
Age, Continuous8.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.89
Age, Customized
>=10 to <=18 years
4 participants
Age, Customized
>=4 to <8 years
10 participants
Age, Customized
>=8 to <10 years
6 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 2018 / 1816 / 1817 / 1820 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 202 / 188 / 186 / 1814 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEs

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of weekly infusions of BMN 110 administered in escalating doses to subjects with MPS IVA. The safety variable incidence of TEAE is summarized.

Time frame: Entire Study, through week 84

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDrug-Related AE Causing Permanent StudyDrug Discon1 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDeath0 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.1 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AE Causing Study Discont.1 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related SAEs2 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AEs12 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudyDrug-Related SAE Causing Permanent DrugDiscon1 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs18 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudy Drug-Related SAE Causing Study Discont.1 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs6 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.1 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs During Infusion15 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Study Discontinuation1 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs During Infusion5 participants
BMN 110Subject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs Causing Study Discontinuation1 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Study Discontinuation0 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs Causing Study Discontinuation0 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDeath0 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.0 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs2 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.0 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AE Causing Study Discont.0 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDrug-Related AE Causing Permanent StudyDrug Discon0 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related SAEs1 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs During Infusion0 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudyDrug-Related SAE Causing Permanent DrugDiscon0 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs During Infusion13 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AEs10 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs18 participants
1.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudy Drug-Related SAE Causing Study Discont.0 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AE Causing Study Discont.0 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AEs7 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs8 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related SAEs2 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs During Infusion10 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs During Infusion1 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs Causing Study Discontinuation0 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs17 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.0 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDrug-Related AE Causing Permanent StudyDrug Discon0 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Study Discontinuation0 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.0 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudy Drug-Related SAE Causing Study Discont.0 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudyDrug-Related SAE Causing Permanent DrugDiscon0 participants
2.0 mg/kg/WeekSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDeath0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Study Discontinuation0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AEs8 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDrug-Related AE Causing Permanent StudyDrug Discon0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudy Drug-Related SAE Causing Study Discont.0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs During Infusion15 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related SAEs1 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs6 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDeath0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AE Causing Study Discont.0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs17 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs Causing Study Discontinuation0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudyDrug-Related SAE Causing Permanent DrugDiscon0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.0 participants
Continuation PeriodSubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs During Infusion1 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.1 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudyDrug-Related SAE Causing Permanent DrugDiscon1 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDrug-Related AE Causing Permanent StudyDrug Discon1 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs During Infusion17 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs20 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Study Discontinuation1 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related SAEs4 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs Causing Permanent Study Drug Discont.1 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AEs14 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsDeath0 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsStudy Drug-Related SAE Causing Study Discont.1 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs14 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny Study Drug-Related AE Causing Study Discont.1 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny AEs Causing Study Discontinuation1 participants
Entire StudySubject Incidence of Treatment Emergent AEsAny SAEs During Infusion6 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 3MSCT

Change from baseline in the 3-minute Stair Climb Test. Patients walked up stairs that have a railing, which could be used for support, for 3 minutes, with the number of stairs climbed recorded. The test result was the number of steps climbed per minute.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72

Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all subjects who enrolled in the study). One patient was developmentally unable to perform the 3MSCT and the test scores were set to missing. The analysis was based on observed cases.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 3MSCTWeek 12 Change from Baseline (n=19)0.3 steps/minStandard Deviation 14.07
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 3MSCTWeek 24 Change from Baseline (n=17)6.1 steps/minStandard Deviation 8.66
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 3MSCTWeek 36 Change from Baseline (n=17)7.8 steps/minStandard Deviation 13.69
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 3MSCTWeek 48 Change from Baseline (n=17)9.7 steps/minStandard Deviation 14.42
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 3MSCTWeek 72 Change from Baseline (n=17)9.7 steps/minStandard Deviation 13.91
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 6MWT

Change from baseline in meters in 6-minute Walk Test. As a measure of endurance, a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed according to the American Thoracic Society Guidelines. Patients were instructed to walk as far as possible in 6 minutes.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72

Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all subjects who enrolled in the study). Two patients were either physically (score was designated as 0 m) or developmentally (score was set to missing) unable to perform the 6MWT. The analysis was based on observed cases.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 6MWTWeek 12 Change from Baseline (n=19)-20.7 metersStandard Deviation 85.95
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 6MWTWeek 24 Change from Baseline (n=17)16.3 metersStandard Deviation 71.74
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 6MWTWeek 36 Change from Baseline (n=17)13.8 metersStandard Deviation 63.25
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 6MWTWeek 48 Change from Baseline (n=17)-4.8 metersStandard Deviation 64.7
BMN 110Change From Baseline in 6MWTWeek 72 Change from Baseline (n=17)4.0 metersStandard Deviation 87.24
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in FVC

Percent Change from baseline in Forced Vital Capacity.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 72

Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all subjects who enrolled in the study). The analysis was based on observed cases.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in FVCWeek 12 Percent Change from Baseline (n=18)3.4 percentage of FVCStandard Deviation 10.85
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in FVCWeek 24 Percent Change from Baseline (n=16)0.2 percentage of FVCStandard Deviation 16.6
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in FVCWeek 36 Percent Change from Baseline (n=16)10.7 percentage of FVCStandard Deviation 20.82
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in FVCWeek 72 Percent Change from Baseline (n=16)12.5 percentage of FVCStandard Deviation 14.88
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in MVV

Percent Change from baseline in Maximum Voluntary Ventilation.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 72

Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all subjects who enrolled in the study). The analysis was based on observed cases.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in MVVWeek 12 Percent Change from Baseline (n=14)9.9 percentage of MVVStandard Deviation 21.29
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in MVVWeek 24 Percent Change from Baseline (n=13)11.0 percentage of MVVStandard Deviation 21.48
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in MVVWeek 36 Percent Change from Baseline (n=14)10.5 percentage of MVVStandard Deviation 17.43
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in MVVWeek 72 Percent Change from Baseline (n=14)18.4 percentage of MVVStandard Deviation 20.77
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in uKS

Percent Change from baseline in Normalized Urine KS. The percent change was calculated (Week X value - baseline value)/baseline value \*100%

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 72

Population: Intent-to-Treat population (all subjects who enrolled in the study). The analysis was based on observed cases.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in uKSWeek 12 Percent Change from Baseline (n=19)-23.2 percentage of uKSStandard Deviation 19.04
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in uKSWeek 24 Percent Change from Baseline (n=18)-27.9 percentage of uKSStandard Deviation 17.92
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in uKSWeek 36 Percent Change from Baseline (n=18)-40.6 percentage of uKSStandard Deviation 20.16
BMN 110Percent Change From Baseline in uKSWeek 72 Percent Change from Baseline (n=17)-32.2 percentage of uKSStandard Deviation 17.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026