Skip to content

A Placebo-Controlled Study of Clonidine for Fecal Incontinence.

A Placebo-Controlled Study of Clonidine for Fecal Incontinence.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00884832
Enrollment
44
Registered
2009-04-21
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2014-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Keywords

fecal incontinence, stool leakage, incontinence, FI, Urge predominant fecal incontinence

Brief summary

Fecal incontinence is the involuntary leakage of stool from the anus. Doctors at Mayo Clinic are doing a research study to assess the effects of a medication, clonidine, on fecal incontinence and rectal functions in women. Clonidine has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating high blood pressure, but not for treating incontinence and rectal functions. The hypothesis of this study is clonidine will improve fecal incontinence, increase rectal capacity and reduce rectal sensation to a greater extent than placebo in women.

Detailed description

Available therapeutic options for idiopathic fecal incontinence (FI) are limited and unsatisfactory. In addition to weak anal sphincters, our data suggest that reduced rectal capacity may contribute to rectal hypersensitivity and the symptom of rectal urgency in FI. During a 4 week study, oral clonidine restored rectal capacity and improved fecal continence in women with urge-predominant FI. Clonidine improves fecal continence and stool consistency in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Therefore, we now propose a placebo-controlled study of clonidine for FI. Our aims are to (i) compare the effects of clonidine and placebo, to be given for 4 weeks, on symptoms, anal pressures, rectal compliance and sensation in women with FI. Forty four women (18-75 y) with urge predominant idiopathic FI and ≥ 4 episodes of FI during a 4 week screening period will be recruited to this study. Thereafter, patients will be treated with clonidine or placebo for 4 weeks. Bowel symptoms will be recorded in a diary. Anal sphincter pressures, rectal compliance and sensation will be evaluated before and during treatment with clonidine.

Interventions

DRUGClonidine

Subjects randomized to Clonidine will take 0.1 mg of the medication orally twice a day for a total of 4 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Subjects randomized to the placebo group will also take 0.1 mg of matching placebo pills orally twice a day for a total of 4 weeks.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
CollaboratorNIH
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 18-75 years with urge predominant FI, as defined by a validated questionnaire, for greater than or equal to 1 year duration will be eligible to participate * Absence of organic disease (i.e., ulcerative colitis, cancer) as evidenced by colonoscopy, or barium enema and sigmoidoscopy within the last 3 years

Exclusion criteria

* History of clinically significant cardiovascular or pulmonary disease or EKG abnormalities within the last 6 months \[i.e., atrial flutter or fibrillation, sinus tachycardia (\> 110/minute) or bradycardia (\< 45 beats/minute), or prolonged corrected QT (QTc) interval (\> 460 msec) * Current or past history of rectal cancer, scleroderma, inflammatory bowel disease, congenital anorectal abnormalities, greater than or equal to Grade 2 rectal prolapse, history of rectal resection or pelvic irradiation * Neurological disorders - Spinal cord injuries, dementia (Mini-mental status score \<20/25), multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, peripheral neuropathy * Conditions precluding safe use of clonidine, i.e., symptomatic hypotension, or systolic blood pressure of \<100 mm Hg on initial screening visit * Pregnant or nursing women * Severe diarrhea during the run in phase defined as greater than 6 liquid stools daily (Bristol 6 or 7) * Medications: Absolute - opioid analgesics, anticholinergic drugs \[low doses of tricyclic antidepressants, e.g., nortriptyline (up to 50 mg/day) or amitriptyline (up to 25 mg/day) will be permitted provided they were begun 3 months prior to the screening period\] * Medications: Relative - other antihypertensive agents (i.e., if there is concern about synergistic effects and hypotension)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Fecal Incontinence and Constipation Assessment (FICA) Score4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatmentThe FICA severity scale has 4 items (frequency, type, amount of leakage, and presence of urgency) and is used to rate the severity of fecal incontinence. The parameter was computed from values in the weekly diaries. The FICA score can range from 1 to 13. Symptom severity scores of 1-6, 7-10, and 11-13 are categorized as mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Scores were averaged over the 4 week baseline period and the 4 week treatment periods.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Number of Fecal Incontinence Episodes4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatmentValues were averaged over 4 week baseline and 4 week treatment periods.
Mean Percentage of Bowel Movements Which Were Incontinent4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatmentValues were averaged over 4 week baseline and 4 week treatment periods.
Mean Severity of Fecal Incontinence4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatmentThe Fecal Incontinence Severity Index was used to compute the severity of fecal incontinence (FI). It is a validated 4-item scale used to assess the frequency of 4 different types of FI (gas, mucus, liquid stool, solid stool). The subject responses are weighted and summed for the 4 types of FI. Scores could range from 0 (no symptoms) to 61 (very frequent FI). Values were computed from pre- and post- treatment questionnaires.
Impact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of Life4 weeks baselineScores were computed from a pre-treatment questionnaire, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. This scale is composed of a total of 29 items; these items form four scales: Lifestyle (10 items) Coping/Behavior (9 items), Depression/Self Perception (7 items), and Embarrassment (3 items). Scales range from 1 to 4; with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. Scales scores are the average (mean) response to all items in the scale (that is, add the responses to all questions in a scale together and then divide by the number of items in the scale, adjusting for missing values).
Impact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of Lifeafter 4 weeks treatmentScores were computed from a post-treatment questionnaire, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. This scale is composed of a total of 29 items; these items form four scales: Lifestyle (10 items) Coping/Behavior (9 items), Depression/Self Perception (7 items), and Embarrassment (3 items). Scales range from 1 to 4; with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. Scales scores are the average (mean) response to all items in the scale (that is, add the responses to all questions in a scale together and then divide by the number of items in the scale, adjusting for missing values).
Mean Number of Days With Fecal Incontinence4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatmentValues were averaged over 4 week baseline and 4 week treatment periods.
Percentage of Bowel Movements Preceded by Rectal Urgency4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatmentRectal urgency is defined as a sudden, irresistible need to have a bowel movement. Scores were averaged over the 4 week baseline period and the 4 week treatment periods.
Percentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatmentThe percentage of bowel movements with semi-formed and loose stools was defined as those with a score of 5-7 on the Bristol stool form scale.
Percentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools Post-treatment Adjusted for Baseline4 weeks treatmentThe percentage of bowel movements with semi-formed and loose stools was defined as those with a score of 5-7 on the Bristol stool form scale. The adjustment for baseline was an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) where the covariate was the baseline version of the endpoint.
Percentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment
Percentage of Days With FI Post-treatment Adjusted for Baseline4 weeks treatmentThe adjustment for baseline was an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) where the covariate was the baseline version of the endpoint.
Satisfaction With Treatment4 weeks baseline, 4 week treatmentThis parameter was determined by a 100 mm visual analog scale, with possible scores ranging from 0 = Not satisfied at all (no relief of symptoms) to 100 = Completely satisfied (symptoms resolved). The parameter was computed from weekly diaries. Scores were averaged over the 4 week baseline period and the 4 week treatment periods.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted between January 2009 and April 2012.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oral Clonidine
Subjects randomized to Clonidine will take 0.1 mg of the medication orally twice a day for a total of 4 weeks.
22
Oral Placebo
Subjects randomized to the placebo group will also take 0.1 mg of matching placebo pills orally twice a day for a total of 4 weeks.
22
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOral ClonidineOral PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.88
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.86
57.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.26
Body Mass Index30.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.09
28.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.35
29.14 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.81
Functional diarrhea or Diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Subjects with diarrhea
9 participants13 participants22 participants
Functional diarrhea or Diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Subjects without diarrhea
13 participants9 participants22 participants
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy
9 participants11 participants20 participants
Hysterectomy
No Hysterectomy
13 participants11 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants22 participants44 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants22 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 227 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Fecal Incontinence and Constipation Assessment (FICA) Score

The FICA severity scale has 4 items (frequency, type, amount of leakage, and presence of urgency) and is used to rate the severity of fecal incontinence. The parameter was computed from values in the weekly diaries. The FICA score can range from 1 to 13. Symptom severity scores of 1-6, 7-10, and 11-13 are categorized as mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Scores were averaged over the 4 week baseline period and the 4 week treatment periods.

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidineMean Fecal Incontinence and Constipation Assessment (FICA) Score4 weeks baseline8.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Oral ClonidineMean Fecal Incontinence and Constipation Assessment (FICA) Score4 weeks treatment6.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Oral PlaceboMean Fecal Incontinence and Constipation Assessment (FICA) Score4 weeks baseline9.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Oral PlaceboMean Fecal Incontinence and Constipation Assessment (FICA) Score4 weeks treatment7.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Secondary

Impact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of Life

Scores were computed from a pre-treatment questionnaire, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. This scale is composed of a total of 29 items; these items form four scales: Lifestyle (10 items) Coping/Behavior (9 items), Depression/Self Perception (7 items), and Embarrassment (3 items). Scales range from 1 to 4; with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. Scales scores are the average (mean) response to all items in the scale (that is, add the responses to all questions in a scale together and then divide by the number of items in the scale, adjusting for missing values).

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidineImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of LifeLifestyle score2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral ClonidineImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of LifeCoping score1.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Oral ClonidineImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of LifeDepression score3.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral ClonidineImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of LifeEmbarrassment score2.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral PlaceboImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of LifeEmbarrassment score2.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral PlaceboImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of LifeLifestyle score2.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral PlaceboImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of LifeDepression score2.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral PlaceboImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Baseline Quality of LifeCoping score1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Impact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of Life

Scores were computed from a post-treatment questionnaire, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. This scale is composed of a total of 29 items; these items form four scales: Lifestyle (10 items) Coping/Behavior (9 items), Depression/Self Perception (7 items), and Embarrassment (3 items). Scales range from 1 to 4; with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. Scales scores are the average (mean) response to all items in the scale (that is, add the responses to all questions in a scale together and then divide by the number of items in the scale, adjusting for missing values).

Time frame: after 4 weeks treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidineImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of LifeLifestyle score3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral ClonidineImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of LifeCoping score2.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral ClonidineImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of LifeDepression score3.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Oral ClonidineImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of LifeEmbarrassment score2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral PlaceboImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of LifeEmbarrassment score2.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral PlaceboImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of LifeLifestyle score2.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral PlaceboImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of LifeDepression score3.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Oral PlaceboImpact of Fecal Incontinence on Post-Treatment Quality of LifeCoping score2.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Mean Number of Days With Fecal Incontinence

Values were averaged over 4 week baseline and 4 week treatment periods.

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidineMean Number of Days With Fecal Incontinence4 weeks baseline13 daysStandard Error 1
Oral ClonidineMean Number of Days With Fecal Incontinence4 weeks treatment8 daysStandard Error 1
Oral PlaceboMean Number of Days With Fecal Incontinence4 weeks baseline16 daysStandard Error 2
Oral PlaceboMean Number of Days With Fecal Incontinence4 weeks treatment11 daysStandard Error 2
Secondary

Mean Number of Fecal Incontinence Episodes

Values were averaged over 4 week baseline and 4 week treatment periods.

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidineMean Number of Fecal Incontinence Episodes4 weeks baseline20 number of episodesStandard Error 3
Oral ClonidineMean Number of Fecal Incontinence Episodes4 weeks treatment12 number of episodesStandard Error 3
Oral PlaceboMean Number of Fecal Incontinence Episodes4 weeks baseline31 number of episodesStandard Error 5
Oral PlaceboMean Number of Fecal Incontinence Episodes4 weeks treatment19 number of episodesStandard Error 4
Secondary

Mean Percentage of Bowel Movements Which Were Incontinent

Values were averaged over 4 week baseline and 4 week treatment periods.

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidineMean Percentage of Bowel Movements Which Were Incontinent4 weeks baseline31 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 4
Oral ClonidineMean Percentage of Bowel Movements Which Were Incontinent4 weeks treatment24 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 5
Oral PlaceboMean Percentage of Bowel Movements Which Were Incontinent4 weeks treatment27 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 6
Oral PlaceboMean Percentage of Bowel Movements Which Were Incontinent4 weeks baseline40 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 6
Secondary

Mean Severity of Fecal Incontinence

The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index was used to compute the severity of fecal incontinence (FI). It is a validated 4-item scale used to assess the frequency of 4 different types of FI (gas, mucus, liquid stool, solid stool). The subject responses are weighted and summed for the 4 types of FI. Scores could range from 0 (no symptoms) to 61 (very frequent FI). Values were computed from pre- and post- treatment questionnaires.

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidineMean Severity of Fecal Incontinence4 weeks baseline36.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Oral ClonidineMean Severity of Fecal Incontinence4 weeks treatment29.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
Oral PlaceboMean Severity of Fecal Incontinence4 weeks baseline37.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.5
Oral PlaceboMean Severity of Fecal Incontinence4 weeks treatment31.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Secondary

Percentage of Bowel Movements Preceded by Rectal Urgency

Rectal urgency is defined as a sudden, irresistible need to have a bowel movement. Scores were averaged over the 4 week baseline period and the 4 week treatment periods.

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Bowel Movements Preceded by Rectal Urgency4 weeks baseline55 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 4
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Bowel Movements Preceded by Rectal Urgency4 weeks treatment46 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 6
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Bowel Movements Preceded by Rectal Urgency4 weeks baseline59 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 5
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Bowel Movements Preceded by Rectal Urgency4 weeks treatment46 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 6
Secondary

Percentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea

The percentage of bowel movements with semi-formed and loose stools was defined as those with a score of 5-7 on the Bristol stool form scale.

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea4 weeks baseline, subjects without diarrhea19.4 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 4.9
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea4 weeks treatment, subjects without diarrhea14 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 4.2
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea4 weeks baseline, subjects with diarrhea47.5 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 8.1
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea4 weeks treatment, subjects with diarrhea31.2 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 7
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea4 weeks baseline, subjects with diarrhea51.6 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 6.4
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea4 weeks baseline, subjects without diarrhea25.5 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 6.2
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea4 weeks treatment, subjects with diarrhea49 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 5.5
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools in Subjects With and Without Diarrhea4 weeks treatment, subjects without diarrhea16 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 7.2
Comparison: Proportion of semi-formed and loose stools (Bristol Form 5-7) associated with diarrhea subgroup versus no diarrhea subgroup.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools Post-treatment Adjusted for Baseline

The percentage of bowel movements with semi-formed and loose stools was defined as those with a score of 5-7 on the Bristol stool form scale. The adjustment for baseline was an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) where the covariate was the baseline version of the endpoint.

Time frame: 4 weeks treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools Post-treatment Adjusted for BaselineSubjects with diarrhea23.6 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 4.8
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools Post-treatment Adjusted for BaselineSubjects without diarrhea25.4 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 4.3
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools Post-treatment Adjusted for BaselineSubjects with diarrhea38.7 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 4.3
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Bowel Movements With Semi-formed and Loose Stools Post-treatment Adjusted for BaselineSubjects without diarrhea22.8 percentage of bowel movementsStandard Error 4.8
p-value: 0.018ANCOVA
Comparison: drug\*group interactionsp-value: 0.047ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)4 weeks baseline, subjects without diarrhea28.7 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.5
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)4 weeks baseline, subjects with diarrhea35.4 percentage of daysStandard Error 7.2
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)4 weeks treatment, subjects without diarrhea23.2 percentage of daysStandard Error 7.1
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)4 weeks treatment, subjects with diarrhea24.3 percentage of daysStandard Error 8.5
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)4 weeks treatment, subjects with diarrhea33.3 percentage of daysStandard Error 9.8
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)4 weeks baseline, subjects without diarrhea37.8 percentage of daysStandard Error 10.6
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)4 weeks treatment, subjects without diarrhea18.7 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.4
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Days With Fecal Incontinence (FI)4 weeks baseline, subjects with diarrhea42.1 percentage of daysStandard Error 8.1
Secondary

Percentage of Days With FI Post-treatment Adjusted for Baseline

The adjustment for baseline was an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) where the covariate was the baseline version of the endpoint.

Time frame: 4 weeks treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Days With FI Post-treatment Adjusted for BaselineSubjects without diarrhea42.54 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.92
Oral ClonidinePercentage of Days With FI Post-treatment Adjusted for BaselineSubjects with diarrhea27.79 percentage of daysStandard Error 6.97
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Days With FI Post-treatment Adjusted for BaselineSubjects without diarrhea31.42 percentage of daysStandard Error 6.97
Oral PlaceboPercentage of Days With FI Post-treatment Adjusted for BaselineSubjects with diarrhea39.51 percentage of daysStandard Error 5.94
p-value: 0.082ANCOVA
Secondary

Satisfaction With Treatment

This parameter was determined by a 100 mm visual analog scale, with possible scores ranging from 0 = Not satisfied at all (no relief of symptoms) to 100 = Completely satisfied (symptoms resolved). The parameter was computed from weekly diaries. Scores were averaged over the 4 week baseline period and the 4 week treatment periods.

Time frame: 4 weeks baseline, 4 week treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral ClonidineSatisfaction With Treatment4 weeks baseline22 units on a scaleStandard Error 6
Oral ClonidineSatisfaction With Treatment4 weeks treatment47 units on a scaleStandard Error 6
Oral PlaceboSatisfaction With Treatment4 weeks baseline18 units on a scaleStandard Error 4
Oral PlaceboSatisfaction With Treatment4 weeks treatment38 units on a scaleStandard Error 6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026