Skip to content

Leadership Instructions Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a High Fidelity Simulation

Brief Leadership Instructions Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a High Fidelity Simulation: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00884559
Enrollment
237
Registered
2009-04-20
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2009-04-30
Last updated
2012-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitations

Keywords

Leadership, Team building, Resuscitation

Brief summary

Whether teaching leadership with a short debriefing has a positive influence on the performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation remains largely unknown. The investigators will assess the sustained efficacy of a short leadership debriefing compared to a technical debriefing in a high fidelity simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Detailed description

Context: Whether the performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation can be positively influenced by teaching leadership with a short debriefing remains largely unknown Objective: To test the hypothesis that (1) leadership instruction are effective and (2) improved leadership results in better performance in a high fidelity simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Design: Prospective, randomized-controlled superiority trial Setting: Simulator Center of the University Hospital Basel in Switzerland Patients or Other Participants: 237 volunteer medical students in teams of 3 Intervention: During a baseline visit, the medical students participate in a video-taped simulated witnessed cardiac arrest. Participants are randomized to receive thereafter a short video-assisted debriefing focusing either on correct positions of arms and shoulders (technical debriefing) or on leadership and communication to enhance team coordination (leadership debriefing). A follow-up simulation is conducted after 4 months. Leadership utterances, technical skills and the resuscitation performance of the teams are compared based on videotapes coded by two independent researchers. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes for this study are the amount of hands-on time in the first 180 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest and the time elapsed until cardiopulmonary resuscitation was started. Secondary endpoints are the effectiveness of the technical and leadership instructions, respectively.

Interventions

Debriefing

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* volunteer medical students

Exclusion criteria

* no informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hands-on time in the first 180 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest and the time elapsed until cardiopulmonary resuscitation is started.180 sec after start of CPR

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The effectiveness of the technical and leadership instructions180 sec after starting CPR

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026