Leukemia, Lymphoma
Conditions
Keywords
Aplidin, Aggressive Non Hodgkin Lymphoma, Leukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell and B-cell
Brief summary
This is a multicenter study to assess the anti-tumour activity,to investigate the safety profile and to obtain additional pharmacokinetic information for Aplidin® given as 1-hour weekly IV infusion in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Detailed description
A Phase II Multicenter,Open-Label, Clinical And Pharmacokinetic Study Of Aplidin® As A 1-Hour Weekly IV Infusion, In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Primary • To assess the anti-tumour activity of Aplidin® given as a 1-hour weekly IV infusion, in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, relapsing or refractory to a prior therapy. Secondary * To further investigate the safety profile of Aplidin® given as 1-hour weekly IV infusion in this patient population. * To obtain additional pharmacokinetic information for Aplidin® given as 1-hour weekly IV infusion in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Interventions
Aplidin® will be administered at a starting dose of 3.2 mg/m2, as a 1-hour intravenous infusion, on days 1, 8 and 15, every 28 days cycle.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Written informed consent * Histologically confirmed aggressive lymphomas, * Patient requires treatment because NHL relapses * Measurable disease * Recovery from any non-hematological toxicity derived from previous treatments. The presence of alopecia and NCI-CTC grade \< 2 symptomatic peripheral neuropathy is allowed. * Age \> 18 years. * Performance status (ECOG) \< 2 * Adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function (assessed \< 14 days before inclusion in the study) * Left ventricular ejection fraction within normal limits.
Exclusion criteria
* Prior therapy with Aplidin®. * Concomitant therapy with any anti-lymphoproliferative agent * Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. * CNS lymphoma. * HIV-associated lymphoma. * Prior gene therapy with viral vectors. * More than three previous lines of systemic biological agents or chemotherapies. Wash-out periods since the end of the precedent therapy less than: * 6 weeks for nitroso-urea or high dose chemotherapy * 3 weeks for other chemotherapies or biological agents * 4 weeks for radiation or radionuclide therapy (6 weeks in case of prior extensive external beam radiation (more than 25% of bone marrow distribution). * 4 weeks for major prior surgery * 30 days for any investigational product * 4 weeks for immunosuppressive therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. * Pregnant or lactating women. * Men and women of reproductive potential who are not using effective contraceptive methods * History of another neoplastic disease. Exceptions: Non-melanoma skin cancer,cCarcinoma in situ of any site,any other cancer curatively treated and no evidence of disease for at least 10 years. * Known cerebral or leptomeningeal involvement. * Other relevant diseases or adverse clinical conditions * Treatment with any investigational product in the 30 days period before inclusion in the study. * Known hypersensitivity to Aplidin®, mannitol, cremophor EL, or ethanol * Limitation of the patient's ability to comply with the treatment or follow-up protocol.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate | All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first | The primary objective of the study was the exploration of the efficacy of plitidepsin when given as a weekly 1-hour infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15 in 4-week cycles to patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. The primary efficacy endpoint was the Objective Response Rate, defined as the combined rate of Complete Response (CR), Unconfirmed Complete Response (CRu) and Partial Response (PR) following the definition of response according to the International Working Group (IWG) criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of Response | All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first | Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented objective response (CR, CRu or PR) to disease progression or death. Patients who had not progressed or died were to have their duration censored at the date of their last disease assessment. |
| Time to Progression | All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first | Time to progression (TTP) was to be calculated from the first day of plitidepsin treatment to the date of disease progression. |
| Time to Response Onset | All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first | Time to response onset was defined as the time from the first day of plitidepsin treatment to the first documentation of response. |
| Progression-free Survival | All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first | Progression-free survival (PFS) was to be calculated from the date of registration to the date of first objective disease progression or death from any cause. Patients who were lost to follow-up without documentation of progression were to be censored at the last date they were assessed and found progression-free. A patient receiving a new treatment in the absence of documented progression was to be considered as progressing at the time of re-treatment. |
| Overall Survival | All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first | Overall survival (OS) was to be calculated from the date of registration to the date of death from any cause. Patients with no documented death were to be censored at the last date they were known to be alive. |
| Time to Subsequent Chemotherapy | All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first | Time to subsequent therapy was to be calculated from the first infusion of the study drug to the start date of the subsequent therapy. Patients without subsequent therapy were to be censored at their last reported date. |
Countries
France, Italy, Peru, Puerto Rico, Spain, Switzerland
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Aplidin® (Cohort Non-cutaneous) Aplidin® given as a 1-hour weekly IV infusion
Aplidin®: Aplidin® will be administered at a starting dose of 3.2 mg/m2, as a 1-hour intravenous infusion, on days 1, 8 and 15, every 28 days cycle. | 34 |
| Aplidin® (Cohort Other Lymphoma) Aplidin® given as a 1-hour weekly IV infusion
Aplidin®: Aplidin® will be administered at a starting dose of 3.2 mg/m2, as a 1-hour intravenous infusion, on days 1, 8 and 15, every 28 days cycle. | 33 |
| Total | 67 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Comprised lung carcinoma | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Death | 2 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Not treated | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Progressive disease | 21 | 28 |
| Overall Study | Septic shock | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Thrombus in right auricle | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Toxicity | 4 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Aplidin® (Cohort Non-cutaneous) | Aplidin® (Cohort Other Lymphoma) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 17 years | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Customized >= 70 years | 6 Participants | 10 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Age, Customized Between 18 and 49 years | 14 Participants | 3 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Age, Customized Between 50 and 69 years | 14 Participants | 19 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 20 Participants | 23 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Peru | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 7 Participants | 9 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 24 Participants | 22 Participants | 46 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 11 Participants | 21 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 10 / 32 | 10 / 32 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 31 / 32 | 32 / 32 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 13 / 32 | 11 / 32 |
Outcome results
Objective Response Rate
The primary objective of the study was the exploration of the efficacy of plitidepsin when given as a weekly 1-hour infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15 in 4-week cycles to patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. The primary efficacy endpoint was the Objective Response Rate, defined as the combined rate of Complete Response (CR), Unconfirmed Complete Response (CRu) and Partial Response (PR) following the definition of response according to the International Working Group (IWG) criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL).
Time frame: All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first
Population: The efficacy and safety analyses were to be performed separately for the subset of treated patients with non-cutaneous Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL), and for the subset of treated patients with other lymphomas.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Other lymphomas | Complete response | 0 Participants |
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Other lymphomas | Partial response | 0 Participants |
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Other lymphomas | Stable Disease | 6 Participants |
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Other lymphomas | Progressive disease | 24 Participants |
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Other lymphomas | Not evaluable | 3 Participants |
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Non-cutaneous PTCL | Complete response | 2 Participants |
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Non-cutaneous PTCL | Partial response | 4 Participants |
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Non-cutaneous PTCL | Stable Disease | 6 Participants |
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Non-cutaneous PTCL | Progressive disease | 17 Participants |
| Arm One | Objective Response Rate | Non-cutaneous PTCL | Not evaluable | 5 Participants |
Duration of Response
Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented objective response (CR, CRu or PR) to disease progression or death. Patients who had not progressed or died were to have their duration censored at the date of their last disease assessment.
Time frame: All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first
Population: The efficacy and safety analyses were to be performed separately for the subset of treated patients with non-cutaneous PTCL, and for the subset of treated patients with other lymphomas.~The six responders belong to the Non-cutaneous PTCL cohort.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm One | Duration of Response | 2.2 months |
Overall Survival
Overall survival (OS) was to be calculated from the date of registration to the date of death from any cause. Patients with no documented death were to be censored at the last date they were known to be alive.
Time frame: All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first
Population: The efficacy and safety analyses were to be performed separately for the subset of treated patients with non-cutaneous PTCL, and for the subset of treated patients with other lymphomas.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm One | Overall Survival | Non-cutaneous PTCL | 10.2 months |
| Arm One | Overall Survival | Other lymphomas | 4.5 months |
Progression-free Survival
Progression-free survival (PFS) was to be calculated from the date of registration to the date of first objective disease progression or death from any cause. Patients who were lost to follow-up without documentation of progression were to be censored at the last date they were assessed and found progression-free. A patient receiving a new treatment in the absence of documented progression was to be considered as progressing at the time of re-treatment.
Time frame: All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first
Population: The efficacy and safety analyses were to be performed separately for the subset of treated patients with non-cutaneous PTCL, and for the subset of treated patients with other lymphomas.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm One | Progression-free Survival | Non-cutaneous PTCL | 1.6 months |
| Arm One | Progression-free Survival | Other lymphomas | 1.3 months |
Time to Progression
Time to progression (TTP) was to be calculated from the first day of plitidepsin treatment to the date of disease progression.
Time frame: All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first
Population: The efficacy and safety analyses were to be performed separately for the subset of treated patients with non-cutaneous PTCL, and for the subset of treated patients with other lymphomas.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm One | Time to Progression | Non-cutaneous PTCL | 1.6 months |
| Arm One | Time to Progression | Other lymphomas | 1.3 months |
Time to Response Onset
Time to response onset was defined as the time from the first day of plitidepsin treatment to the first documentation of response.
Time frame: All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first
Population: The efficacy and safety analyses were to be performed separately for the subset of treated patients with non-cutaneous PTCL, and for the subset of treated patients with other lymphomas.~Six responders belong to the Non-cutaneous PTCL cohort
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm One | Time to Response Onset | 7.5 weeks |
Time to Subsequent Chemotherapy
Time to subsequent therapy was to be calculated from the first infusion of the study drug to the start date of the subsequent therapy. Patients without subsequent therapy were to be censored at their last reported date.
Time frame: All patients were followed up to progressive disease, start of a new anti-cancer therapy, death or one year after the last treatment visit of the last patient, whichever occured first
Population: The efficacy and safety analyses were to be performed separately for the subset of treated patients with non-cutaneous PTCL, and for the subset of treated patients with other lymphomas.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm One | Time to Subsequent Chemotherapy | 3.8 months |
| Arm One (Subset of Treated Patients With Other Lymphomas) | Time to Subsequent Chemotherapy | 1.9 months |