Skip to content

Cost Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Cost Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00884130
Enrollment
200
Registered
2009-04-20
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2007-10-31
Last updated
2009-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Surgery

Keywords

Laparoscopy, Colorectal surgery, Quality of life, economic analysis, Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Brief summary

Hypothesis: The total costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery are less than those of open surgery. Secondary hypothesis: Patients quality of life is higher following laparoscopic surgery, as compared to open colorectal surgery. Research objectives: 1. To estimate the cost implications and clinical benefits of incorporating laparoscopic colorectal surgery into routine clinical practice. 2. To examine whether the increased operative costs of laparoscopic surgery are compensated for by a faster recovery, shorter duration of hospital stay, and a reduction in late complications, as compared to open surgery. 3. To investigate whether there are differences in quality of life following laparoscopic colorectal surgery as compared to open surgery. Lay summary: Patients needing an operation for a bowel problem have traditionally had an open operation with an incision on the abdomen, and this is the type of operation that is currently performed in the majority of cases in the United Kingdom today (over 90%). Laparoscopic (or keyhole) surgery has been introduced into bowel surgery, but is currently not widely performed. This is because thus far there have been no clear-cut benefits demonstrated with this technique and the perceived costs are higher than an open operation. The investigators aim to evaluate both of these issues.

Interventions

PROCEDUREopen colorectal resection

Sponsors

Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit
CollaboratorOTHER
Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Europe) GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Surrey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients having a colorectal resection, including benign and malignant tumours, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease, and endometriosis

Exclusion criteria

* Children * Emergency procedures * Patients unable to consent, unable to complete a quality of life diary

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The cost effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal surgery6 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Costs of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery6 weeks
Quality of life of patients having laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery6 weeks

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026