Skip to content

Comparison of Therapeutic Regimens for Scleroderma Interstitial Lung Disease (The Scleroderma Lung Study II)

Mycophenolate vs. Oral Cyclophosphamide in Scleroderma Interstitial Lung Disease (Scleroderma Lung Study II)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00883129
Acronym
SLSII
Enrollment
142
Registered
2009-04-17
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2017-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interstitial Lung Disease, Scleroderma

Keywords

Systemic Sclerosis, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Cyclophosphamide, High Resolution Computerized Tomography, Pulmonary Function, Dyspnea, Health Related Quality of Life

Brief summary

Scleroderma is a rare, long-term autoimmune disease in which normal tissue is replaced with dense, thick fibrous tissue. Normally, the immune system helps defend the body against disease and infection. In people with scleroderma, the immune system triggers fibroblast cells to produce too much of the protein collagen. The extra collagen becomes deposited in the skin and organs, causing hardening and thickening that is similar to the scarring process. Although scleroderma most often affects the skin, it also can affect other parts of the body, including the lungs, and in its most severe forms scleroderma can be life-threatening. Scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease is one example of a life-threatening scleroderma condition. In people with symptomatic scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease, scarring occurs in the delicate lung tissue, compromising lung function. The purpose of this study is to determine whether people with symptomatic scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease experience more respiratory benefits from treatment with a 2-year course of mycophenolate mofetil or treatment with a 1-year course of oral cyclophosphamide.

Detailed description

Interstitial lung disease describes a condition in which the lung tissue has become scarred or inflamed. Interstitial lung disease caused by scleroderma, specifically seen as progressive pulmonary fibrosis, occurs in approximately 40 percent of patients with scleroderma and has emerged as the leading overall cause of death. In a previous study, the Scleroderma Lung Study I (SLS I), investigators evaluated a 1-year cyclophosphamide (CYC) treatment for people with scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease. The study results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in forced vital capacity, total lung capacity, dyspnea, Rodnan skin scores, and several measures of quality of life. However, when patients were followed for another year after completing their CYC therapy, the beneficial effects of CYC waned and were no longer significant by the 24-month follow-up. Preliminary information suggests that an alternative immunosuppressive medication, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), may be effective in treating this disease, be given for longer periods, and result in fewer side effects. This study, the Scleroderma Lung Study II (SLS II), will compare the safety and efficacy of a 2-year treatment with MMF versus a 1-year treatment with CYC. Specifically, investigators will determine whether MMF produces similar or better improvements in lung capacity and fewer side effects throughout the entire 2-year period. Participation will include about 21 study visits over a 2-year period. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either MMF twice daily for 2 years or CYC once daily for 1 year, followed by placebo for 1 year. Blood and urine samples will be collected every 2 weeks for the first 2 months and then once a month for the remainder of the study. Every 3 months, participants will attend study visits that will include pulmonary function tests, blood and urine sampling, a physical exam, and questionnaires about current health and medications. At the final study visit, participants will also undergo a high resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) scan and possibly a punch biopsy.

Interventions

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil

24 months of oral mycophenolate mofetil, up to a maximal dose of 1.5 grams twice daily as tolerated

DRUGCyclophosphamide

12 months of oral cyclophosphamide, up to a maximal dose of 2 mg/kg daily as tolerated

DRUGPlacebo

12 months of placebo will be delivered to participants in the Cyclophosphamide arm during the second year in order to maintain the blind with the Mycophenolate arm, which receives drug for the entire 2 years.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Hoffmann-La Roche
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Michael Roth
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The presence of either limited (cutaneous thickening distal but not proximal to elbows and knees, with or without facial involvement) or diffuse (cutaneous thickening proximal to elbows and knees, often involving the chest or abdomen) scleroderma, as determined by American College of Rheumatology criteria * Dyspnea on exertion (grade 2 on the Magnitude of Task component of the Mahler Modified Dyspnea Index) * FVC less than or equal to 80 percent of predicted value at screening and less than or equal to 85 percent predicted at baseline * Onset of the first non-Raynaud manifestation of SSc within the prior 84 months * Presence of any ground glass opacification on thoracic high resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) * Repeat FVC at the baseline visit (Visit 2) within 10 percent of the FVC measured at screening and less than or equal to 85 percent predicted.

Exclusion criteria

* FVC less than 45 percent of predicted value at either screening or baseline * Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) (HBg-corrected) less than 30 percent of predicted value and less than 40 percent of predicted when documentation of pulmonary artery pressures by echocardiogram, right heart catheterization or magnetic resonance imaging identifies clinically significant pulmonary hypertension. All participants with a DLCO less than 40 percent predicted must have documentation of pulmonary artery pressures in order to be considered for inclusion. * FEV1/FVC ratio less than 65 percent at either screening or baseline * Clinically significant abnormalities on HRCT not attributable to scleroderma * Diagnosis of clinically significant resting pulmonary hypertension requiring treatment, as ascertained before study evaluation or as part of a standard of care clinical assessment performed outside of the study protocol * Persistent unexplained hematuria (more than 10 red blood cells per high-power field \[RBCs/hpf\]) * History of persistent leukopenia (white blood cell count less than 4000) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 150,000) * Clinically significant anemia (less than 10g/dl) * Baseline liver function test (LFTs) or bilirubin more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, other than that due to Gilbert's disease * Concomitant and present use of captopril * Serum creatinine more than 2.0mg/dL * Uncontrolled congestive heart failure * Pregnancy (documented by urine pregnancy test) and/or breast feeding * Prior use of oral CYC or MMF for more than 8 weeks or the receipt of more than two intravenous doses of CYC in the past * Use of CYC and/or MMF in the 30 days before random assignment * Active infection (lung or elsewhere) whose management would be compromised by CYC or MMF * Other serious concomitant medical illness (e.g., cancer), chronic debilitating illness (other than scleroderma), or unreliability or drug abuse that might compromise the patient's participation in the study * Current use, or use within the 30 days prior to random assignment, of prednisone (or equivalent) in doses of more than 10 mg/day * If of child bearing potential (a female participant \<55 years of age who has not been postmenopausal for \> 5 years and who has not had a hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy), failure to employ two reliable means of contraception (which may include surgical sterilization, barrier methods, spermicidals, intrauterine devices, and/or hormonal contraception). * Use of contraindicated medications; more information on this criterion can be found in the study protocol * Smoking of cigars, pipes, or cigarettes in the 6 months before study entry * Use of medications with putative disease-modifying properties within the past month (e.g., D-penicillamine, azathioprine, methotrexate, Potaba)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMeasured at study Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24The primary outcome is the course over time from baseline to 24 months for the FVC %-predicted. The FVC %-predicted represents the adjusted volume of air (adjusted as a percentage of the expected normal valued based on the participant's age, height, gender and ethnicity) that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. The FVC %-predicted is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease and is used as a measure of lung involvement and disease severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Single-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMeasured at study entry and Months 3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24The DLCO is a pulmonary function test that measures the capacity for the lung to carry out gas exchange between the inhaled breath and the pulmonary capillary blood vessels and the DLCO %-predicted represents the DLCO expressed as a percentage of the expected normal valued based on the participant's age, height, gender and ethnicity. The DLCO %-predicted is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease and is used as a measure of disease severity.
Fibrosis Score, as Measured by Thoracic High Resolution Computerized Tomography (HRCT)Measured at baseline and Month 24Imaging of the whole lung (WL) is performed using a volumetric high resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) scan, which is then analyzed using a computer algorithm to determine the percentage of overall pixels exhibiting features characteristic for quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF). Higher percentages for QLF-WL therefore represent greater involvement by lung fibrosis.
Transitional Dyspnea Index ScoreMeasured at Months 6, 12, 18, and 24Change in breathlessness was assessed using the Transitional Dyspnea Index, which compares current symptoms to those at baseline. Total score ranges from - 9 to + 9. The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea.
Total Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMeasured at study entry and Months 6, 12, 18, and 24The TLC represents the total volume of air within the lung after taking the deepest breath possible and the TLC %-predicted represents the TLC expressed as a percentage of the expected normal valued based on the participant's age, height, gender and ethnicity. The TLC %-predicted is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease and is used as a measure of disease severity.
Skin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Measured at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24Skin thickness is quantified using the modified Rodnan measurement method (mRSS), with a scale that ranges from 0 (no skin involvement) to a maximum of 51. The reported skin score is determined by a clinical assessment of skin thickness, which is performed by a trained reader, and represents the sum of individual assessments that are made in each of 17 body areas. Each area is given a score in the range of 0-3 (0 = normal; 1= mild thickness; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe thickness). A higher score represents more severe skin involvement.
Toxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathMeasured throughout the 2-year study
Tolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Continuous assessment from randomization to 24 monthsThe number of participants who remained in the study at the listed time points are reported
Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Measured at study entry and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24The HAQ-DI asks questions related to 8 activity domains (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities) with the patient's capacity to carry out each activity scored from 0 to 3. Scores across all domains are averaged and a higher score represents greater disability.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was carried out between September 28, 2009, and January 14, 2013, at 14 University Medical Centers within the United States.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mycophenolate Arm
Participants will receive oral mycophenolate mofetil for 2 years. Mycophenolate mofetil: 24 months of oral mycophenolate mofetil, up to a maximal dose of 1.5 grams twice daily as tolerated
69
Cyclophosphamide Arm
Participants will receive oral cyclophosphamide for 1 year, followed by placebo for 1 year. Cyclophosphamide: 12 months of oral cyclophosphamide, up to a maximal dose of 2 mg/kg daily as tolerated Placebo: 12 months of placebo will be delivered to participants in the Cyclophosphamide arm during the second year in order to maintain the blind with the Mycophenolate arm, which receives drug for the entire 2 years.
73
Total142

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event715
Overall StudyDeath12
Overall StudyDefined Treatment Failure02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyNon-compliance36
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject89

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMycophenolate ArmCyclophosphamide ArmTotal
Age, Continuous52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
ANA(+)61 Participants66 Participants127 Participants
Centromere(+)1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Diffuse cutaneous scleroderma43 Participants40 Participants83 Participants
Duration of scleroderma2.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
2.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
2.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
FEV1/FVC %-predicted81.0 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
83.3 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
82.6 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
FVC %-predicted66.5 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
66.5 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
66.5 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
HAQ disability index0.7 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
0.7 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
0.7 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Limited cutaneous scleroderma26 Participants33 Participants59 Participants
Mahler Dyspnea Index, mean focal score7.3 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
7.1 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
7.2 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
modified-Rodnan Skin Score15.3 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
14.0 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
14.7 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Quantitative extent of lung fibrosis on HRCT, for lobe of maximum involvement23.0 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2
22.6 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3
22.8 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
Quantitative extent of lung fibrosis on HRCT, for whole lung8.3 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
8.9 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
8.6 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
Quantitative extent of total insterstitial lung disease on HRCT, for lobe of maximum involvement50.0 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.9
52.3 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9
51.2 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3
Quantitative extent of total insterstitial lung disease on HRCT, for whole lung27.2 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
31.6 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
29.5 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
RNA Polymerase(+)9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants57 Participants105 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants16 Participants37 Participants
SF-36 Mental component49.1 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
49.8 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
49.4 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
SF-36 Physical component36.0 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
35.6 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
35.8 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Single-Breath Diffusing Capacity60.9 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
61.0 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
60.9 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Topoisomerase-1(+)29 Participants32 Participants61 Participants
Total Lung Capacity66.3 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
65.5 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
65.8 Percent of predicted normal value
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
68 / 6971 / 73
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 6922 / 73

Outcome results

Primary

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted Value

The primary outcome is the course over time from baseline to 24 months for the FVC %-predicted. The FVC %-predicted represents the adjusted volume of air (adjusted as a percentage of the expected normal valued based on the participant's age, height, gender and ethnicity) that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. The FVC %-predicted is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease and is used as a measure of lung involvement and disease severity.

Time frame: Measured at study Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

Population: Randomized participants with an acceptable baseline HRCT study (a pre-specified covariate) and at least one outcome measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Mycophenolate ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueBaseline66.52 FVC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 968.11 FVC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2469.65 FVC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1268.43 FVC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1569.84 FVC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 366.22 FVC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1870.57 FVC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2170.87 FVC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 668.02 FVC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2172.55 FVC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2470.15 FVC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueBaseline66.52 FVC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 367.03 FVC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 667.86 FVC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 969.42 FVC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1571.94 FVC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1872.57 FVC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmForced Vital Capacity (FVC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1269.86 FVC %-pred
Comparison: A modified intention-to-treat inferential joint model combined a mixed-effects model for longitudinal outcomes and a survival model to handle non-ignorable missing data due to study dropout, treatment failure, or death, to assess the course over time, from baseline to 24 months, for the change in the FVC %-predicted. Covariates were %-predicted FVC, HRCT-defined extent of lung fibrosis in the lobe of maximum involvement, and terms for time-trend, treatment and treatment-time trend interactions.p-value: 0.24Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The inferential joint model, as described for the primary analysis, was used to estimate the change from baseline to 24 months for the FVC %-predicted for each treatment arm independently.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Based on the absolute difference between the value of FVC %-predicted at baseline and at 24 months for each subject who returned for a 24-month assessment, a frequency distributions was prepared, stratified by treatment arm, to assess the relative distribution of subjects who either had improvements or worsening in the FVC %-predicted.p-value: 0.55Fisher Exact
Secondary

Fibrosis Score, as Measured by Thoracic High Resolution Computerized Tomography (HRCT)

Imaging of the whole lung (WL) is performed using a volumetric high resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) scan, which is then analyzed using a computer algorithm to determine the percentage of overall pixels exhibiting features characteristic for quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF). Higher percentages for QLF-WL therefore represent greater involvement by lung fibrosis.

Time frame: Measured at baseline and Month 24

Population: Analysis was carried out in the subset of subjects that had measurable HRCT scans at both study entry and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Mycophenolate ArmFibrosis Score, as Measured by Thoracic High Resolution Computerized Tomography (HRCT)Baseline8.25 % of lung exhibiting QLF
Mycophenolate ArmFibrosis Score, as Measured by Thoracic High Resolution Computerized Tomography (HRCT)Month 247.99 % of lung exhibiting QLF
Cyclophosphamide ArmFibrosis Score, as Measured by Thoracic High Resolution Computerized Tomography (HRCT)Baseline8.91 % of lung exhibiting QLF
Cyclophosphamide ArmFibrosis Score, as Measured by Thoracic High Resolution Computerized Tomography (HRCT)Month 248.48 % of lung exhibiting QLF
Comparison: A modified intention-to-treat inferential joint model combined a mixed-effects model for longitudinal outcomes and a survival model to handle non-ignorable missing data due to study dropout, treatment failure, or death, to assess the course over time, from baseline to 24 months, for the change in the Quantitative Lung Fibrosis Score for the whole lung (QLF-WL).p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

The HAQ-DI asks questions related to 8 activity domains (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities) with the patient's capacity to carry out each activity scored from 0 to 3. Scores across all domains are averaged and a higher score represents greater disability.

Time frame: Measured at study entry and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

Population: The analysis population contains all of those with data available at the defined time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mycophenolate ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 30.83 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.72
Mycophenolate ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 150.58 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.62
Mycophenolate ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 90.66 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.66
Mycophenolate ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 180.55 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.55
Mycophenolate ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 60.75 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.71
Mycophenolate ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 210.65 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.65
Mycophenolate ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 120.64 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.67
Mycophenolate ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 240.62 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.69
Mycophenolate ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Baseline0.71 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.62
Cyclophosphamide ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 240.57 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.68
Cyclophosphamide ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Baseline0.74 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.73
Cyclophosphamide ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 30.64 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.67
Cyclophosphamide ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 60.58 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.65
Cyclophosphamide ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 90.65 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.62
Cyclophosphamide ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 120.56 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.6
Cyclophosphamide ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 150.62 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.63
Cyclophosphamide ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 180.55 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.66
Cyclophosphamide ArmHealth-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Patient Responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Month 210.48 HAQ-DI Total ScoreStandard Deviation 0.53
Secondary

Single-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted Value

The DLCO is a pulmonary function test that measures the capacity for the lung to carry out gas exchange between the inhaled breath and the pulmonary capillary blood vessels and the DLCO %-predicted represents the DLCO expressed as a percentage of the expected normal valued based on the participant's age, height, gender and ethnicity. The DLCO %-predicted is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease and is used as a measure of disease severity.

Time frame: Measured at study entry and Months 3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

Population: Randomized participants with an acceptable baseline HRCT study (a pre-specified covariate) and at least one outcome measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Mycophenolate ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1255.32 DLCO %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 353.38 DLCO %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1557.77 DLCO %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueBaseline53.99 DLCO %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1856.62 DLCO %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2155.47 DLCO %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 654.86 DLCO %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2455.31 DLCO %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 954.13 DLCO %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2452.90 DLCO %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 951.55 DLCO %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1855.9 DLCO %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueBaseline54.05 DLCO %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 351.92 DLCO %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 650.87 DLCO %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1253.12 DLCO %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1553.62 DLCO %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmSingle-breath Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2154.26 DLCO %-pred
Comparison: A modified intention-to-treat inferential joint model combined a mixed-effects model for longitudinal outcomes and a survival model to handle non-ignorable missing data due to study dropout, treatment failure, or death, to assess the course over time, from baseline to 24 months, for the change in the DLCO %-predicted.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The inferential joint model, as described for the primary analysis, was used to estimate the change from baseline to 24 months for the DLCO %-predicted for each treatment arm independently.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Skin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)

Skin thickness is quantified using the modified Rodnan measurement method (mRSS), with a scale that ranges from 0 (no skin involvement) to a maximum of 51. The reported skin score is determined by a clinical assessment of skin thickness, which is performed by a trained reader, and represents the sum of individual assessments that are made in each of 17 body areas. Each area is given a score in the range of 0-3 (0 = normal; 1= mild thickness; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe thickness). A higher score represents more severe skin involvement.

Time frame: Measured at baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

Population: Randomized participants with an acceptable baseline HRCT study (a pre-specified covariate) and at least one outcome measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Mycophenolate ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Baseline15.32 mRSS score
Mycophenolate ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 1512.43 mRSS score
Mycophenolate ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 1212.45 mRSS score
Mycophenolate ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 1811.98 mRSS score
Mycophenolate ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 316.03 mRSS score
Mycophenolate ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 2111.22 mRSS score
Mycophenolate ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 614.37 mRSS score
Mycophenolate ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 2411.40 mRSS score
Mycophenolate ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 914.33 mRSS score
Cyclophosphamide ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 247.87 mRSS score
Cyclophosphamide ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 129.47 mRSS score
Cyclophosphamide ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Baseline14.04 mRSS score
Cyclophosphamide ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 611.95 mRSS score
Cyclophosphamide ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 910.61 mRSS score
Cyclophosphamide ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 159.80 mRSS score
Cyclophosphamide ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 189.87 mRSS score
Cyclophosphamide ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 218.50 mRSS score
Cyclophosphamide ArmSkin Involvement, as Measured by the Modified Rodnam Skin Thickness Scores (mRSS)Month 312.85 mRSS score
Comparison: A modified intention-to-treat inferential joint model combined a mixed-effects model for longitudinal outcomes and a survival model to handle non-ignorable missing data due to study dropout, treatment failure, or death, to assess the course over time, from baseline to 24 months, for the change in modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS).p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The inferential joint model, as described for the primary analysis, was used to estimate the change from baseline to 24 months for the modified Rodnan Skin Score for each treatment arm independently.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Based on the absolute difference between the value of the mRSS at baseline and at 24 months for each subject who returned for a 24-month assessment, a frequency distributions was prepared, stratified by treatment arm, to assess the relative distribution of subjects who either had improvements or worsening in the mRSS.p-value: >0.05Fisher Exact
Secondary

Tolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.

The number of participants who remained in the study at the listed time points are reported

Time frame: Continuous assessment from randomization to 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mycophenolate ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 955 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 366 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 1252 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Baseline69 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 1552 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 2149 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 658 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 2449 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 1849 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 2438 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 1842 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Baseline73 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 364 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 656 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 951 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 1246 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 2139 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmTolerability, as Assessed by the Time to Withdrawal From the Study Drug or Meeting Protocol-defined Criteria for Treatment Failure.Month 1544 Participants
Comparison: A log-rank test was utilized to assess differences between the MMF and CYC treatment arms with respect to the time to withdrawal from study drug or meeting protocol-defined criteria for treatment failure.p-value: 0.019Log Rank
Secondary

Total Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted Value

The TLC represents the total volume of air within the lung after taking the deepest breath possible and the TLC %-predicted represents the TLC expressed as a percentage of the expected normal valued based on the participant's age, height, gender and ethnicity. The TLC %-predicted is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease and is used as a measure of disease severity.

Time frame: Measured at study entry and Months 6, 12, 18, and 24

Population: Randomized participants with an acceptable baseline HRCT study (a pre-specified covariate) and at least one outcome measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Mycophenolate ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 667.84 TLC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1868.50 TLC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueBaseline66.16 TLC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2468.24 TLC %-pred
Mycophenolate ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1267.31 TLC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 2466.97 TLC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 667.39 TLC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1268.25 TLC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueMonth 1869.63 TLC %-pred
Cyclophosphamide ArmTotal Lung Capacity (TLC), as a Percent of the Age, Height, Gender, and Ethnicity Adjusted Predicted ValueBaseline65.49 TLC %-pred
Comparison: A modified intention-to-treat inferential joint model combined a mixed-effects model for longitudinal outcomes and a survival model to handle non-ignorable missing data due to study dropout, treatment failure, or death, to assess the course over time, from baseline to 24 months, for the change in the TLC %-predicted.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Toxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Death

Time frame: Measured throughout the 2-year study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mycophenolate ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathNeutropenia (<1.0x10^3 neutrophils/microliter)3 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathPneumonia5 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathThrombocytopenia (<100x10^3 platelets/microliter)0 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathSAE-Total27 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathAnemia (Hgb <10 g/dl)8 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathSAE-related to treatment3 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathHematuria (>10 RBC/high power field)3 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathDeaths5 Participants
Mycophenolate ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathLeukopenia (<2.5x10^3 WBC/microliter)4 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathDeaths11 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathLeukopenia (<2.5x10^3 WBC/microliter)30 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathNeutropenia (<1.0x10^3 neutrophils/microliter)7 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathAnemia (Hgb <10 g/dl)13 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathThrombocytopenia (<100x10^3 platelets/microliter)4 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathHematuria (>10 RBC/high power field)2 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathPneumonia4 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathSAE-Total22 Participants
Cyclophosphamide ArmToxicity, as Measured by Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and DeathSAE-related to treatment7 Participants
Comparison: Fisher's Exact Test was utilized to compare the number of participants with a protocol-defined adverse event of interest, SAE or death between the MMF and CYC treatment arms.p-value: <0.05Fisher Exact
Secondary

Transitional Dyspnea Index Score

Change in breathlessness was assessed using the Transitional Dyspnea Index, which compares current symptoms to those at baseline. Total score ranges from - 9 to + 9. The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea.

Time frame: Measured at Months 6, 12, 18, and 24

Population: Randomized participants with an acceptable baseline HRCT study (a pre-specified covariate) and at least one outcome measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Mycophenolate ArmTransitional Dyspnea Index ScoreMonth 60.74 Transitional Dyspnea Index Score
Mycophenolate ArmTransitional Dyspnea Index ScoreMonth 180.91 Transitional Dyspnea Index Score
Mycophenolate ArmTransitional Dyspnea Index ScoreMonth 121.17 Transitional Dyspnea Index Score
Mycophenolate ArmTransitional Dyspnea Index ScoreMonth 241.86 Transitional Dyspnea Index Score
Cyclophosphamide ArmTransitional Dyspnea Index ScoreMonth 121.23 Transitional Dyspnea Index Score
Cyclophosphamide ArmTransitional Dyspnea Index ScoreMonth 60.31 Transitional Dyspnea Index Score
Cyclophosphamide ArmTransitional Dyspnea Index ScoreMonth 242.09 Transitional Dyspnea Index Score
Cyclophosphamide ArmTransitional Dyspnea Index ScoreMonth 181.78 Transitional Dyspnea Index Score
Comparison: A modified intention-to-treat inferential joint model combined a mixed-effects model for longitudinal outcomes and a survival model to handle non-ignorable missing data due to study dropout, treatment failure, or death, to assess the course over time, from baseline to 24 months, for the change in dyspnea as measured by the Transitional Dyspnea Index Score.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The inferential joint model, as described for the primary analysis, was used to estimate the change from baseline to 24 months for dyspnea using the Transitional Dyspnea Index Score for each treatment arm independently.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026