Skip to content

An Observational Study Evaluating Anti-Idursulfase Serum Antibody Response in Hunter Syndrome Patients

A Multi-Center Observational Study Evaluating Anti-Idursulfase Serum Antibody Response in Hunter Syndrome Patients Enrolled in the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS) Receiving Idursulfase Enzyme Replacement Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00882921
Enrollment
26
Registered
2009-04-17
Start date
2008-10-14
Completion date
2013-02-08
Last updated
2021-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hunter Syndrome

Keywords

MPS 2, MPSII, hunter's disease treatment, enzyme replacement therapy, hunter's disease, iduronate 2 sulfatase, mps diagnosis, mps symptoms, iduronate sulfatase, MPS II treatment, chronic ear infection, hunters syndrome, mps ii therapy, MPS2, hunter's syndrome, Hunter syndrome, elaprase, lysosomal storage disease, hunter syndrome therapy, mps society, hunter syndrome treatment, hunter's syndrome treatment, mucopolysaccharides, mps ii, idursulfase, hunters disease, enlarged adenoids, ert treatment, hunter disease, lysosomal storage disorder

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of anti-idursulfase antibodies on idursulfase safety (measured by infusion related adverse events) between patients who develop anti-idursulfase antibodies and patients who do not after long-term idursulfase enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).

Detailed description

This study is being conducted to satisfy post-marketing commitments to monitor anti-idursulfase antibody development in Hunter syndrome patients after long-term idursulfase enzyme replacement therapy. The study will be conducted as a sub-study within the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS). Hunter syndrome patients in the HOS who have previously received idursulfase as well as treatment-naive patients who will begin idursulfase treatment within 30 days of study enrollment will be included.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIdursulfase

Patients received idursulfase as prescribed by their physician following locally approved prescribing information. Patients will not be provided idursulfase by Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc. or the HOS.

Sponsors

Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
5 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients must meet all of the following criteria to be considered eligible for enrollment: * The patient is male and enrolled in the HOS (i.e., meets the entry criteria of a documented diagnosis of Hunter syndrome) * The patient is ≥ 5 years-old * The patient is on idursulfase treatment or scheduled to begin idursulfase treatment within 30 days of study enrollment * The patient, patient's parent(s), or patient's legally authorized guardian must have voluntarily signed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved informed consent form after all relevant aspects of the study have been explained and discussed with the patient, patient's parent(s), or patient's legally authorized guardian.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet any of the following criteria are not eligible for this study: * The patient has received biologic/ERT products other than idursulfase, or other investigational product(s) for any reason within 30 days prior to study entry. * The patient has a life expectancy of \< 2 years * The patient is unable to comply with the protocol, e.g., has a clinically relevant medical condition making implementation of the protocol difficult; has an uncooperative attitude; is unable to return for safety evaluations; or is otherwise unlikely to complete the study, as determined by the Investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infusion-Related Adverse Event (IRAE) Rates Between IgG Anti-idursulfase Antibody Positive (Ab+) and Anti-idursulfase IgG Antibody Negative (Ab-) PatientsBaseline to 109 WeeksThe primary analysis of how presence of antibodies affected IRAE rates was performed based on a negative binomial regression model. This was done to account for potentially differential follow-up time between antibody groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in uGAG Levels to 109 WeeksBaseline to 109 WeeksUrine GAG

Countries

Brazil, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Elaprase® (0.5 mg/kg)26
Total26

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyOther3
Overall StudyTermination By Investigator3
Overall StudyWithdrawal Of Consent1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicElaprase® (0.5 mg/kg)
Age, Continuous12.82 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.012
Age, Customized
<12 years
17 Participants
Age, Customized
≥12 Years
9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
BRAZIL
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED KINGDOM
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Infusion-Related Adverse Event (IRAE) Rates Between IgG Anti-idursulfase Antibody Positive (Ab+) and Anti-idursulfase IgG Antibody Negative (Ab-) Patients

The primary analysis of how presence of antibodies affected IRAE rates was performed based on a negative binomial regression model. This was done to account for potentially differential follow-up time between antibody groups.

Time frame: Baseline to 109 Weeks

Population: The Safety Population was defined as all enrolled patients who received any portion of a dose of Elaprase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Idursulfase (Elaprase) 0.5 mg/kg WeeklyInfusion-Related Adverse Event (IRAE) Rates Between IgG Anti-idursulfase Antibody Positive (Ab+) and Anti-idursulfase IgG Antibody Negative (Ab-) PatientsAb+ (n =13)0.0121 IRAE/Week
Idursulfase (Elaprase) 0.5 mg/kg WeeklyInfusion-Related Adverse Event (IRAE) Rates Between IgG Anti-idursulfase Antibody Positive (Ab+) and Anti-idursulfase IgG Antibody Negative (Ab-) PatientsAb- (n = 13)0.0042 IRAE/Week
Idursulfase (Elaprase) 0.5 mg/kg WeeklyInfusion-Related Adverse Event (IRAE) Rates Between IgG Anti-idursulfase Antibody Positive (Ab+) and Anti-idursulfase IgG Antibody Negative (Ab-) PatientsAb+ (age adjusted)(n = 13)0.0055 IRAE/Week
Idursulfase (Elaprase) 0.5 mg/kg WeeklyInfusion-Related Adverse Event (IRAE) Rates Between IgG Anti-idursulfase Antibody Positive (Ab+) and Anti-idursulfase IgG Antibody Negative (Ab-) PatientsAb- (age adjusted)(n = 13)0.0026 IRAE/Week
Comparison: The groups compared are Ab+ vs Ab-p-value: 0.130995% CI: [0.731, 11.296]Negative Binomial Model
Comparison: The groups compared are Ab+ (age adjusted) vs Ab- (age adjusted)p-value: 0.271895% CI: [0.563, 7.706]Negative Binomial Model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in uGAG Levels to 109 Weeks

Urine GAG

Time frame: Baseline to 109 Weeks

Population: The Safety Population was defined as all enrolled patients who received any portion of a dose of Elaprase. The primary analysis of how presence of antibodies affected IRAE rates was performed based on a negative binomial regression model. This was done to account for potentially differential follow-up time between antibody groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Idursulfase (Elaprase) 0.5 mg/kg WeeklyChange From Baseline in uGAG Levels to 109 Weeks-74.07 mcg/mgStandard Deviation 246.663

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026