Skip to content

Videophone Administered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Videophone Administered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00881465
Enrollment
31
Registered
2009-04-15
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2015-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Keywords

Obsessive compulsive disorder

Brief summary

Although cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the most effective intervention for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), many people do receive CBT initially. Given this, alternative ways of providing CBT need to be identified and tested. With this in mind, the proposed study examines the efficacy of a videophone based cognitive-behavioral intervention for youth with OCD. A total of 30 youth will be randomly assigned to either videophone administered CBT or an abbreviated wait-list control arm. Comprehensive assessments will be conducted by trained clinicians at relevant time-points to assess symptom severity and impairment.

Detailed description

Although cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the most effective intervention for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), many people do receive CBT initially due, in part, to the lack of trained providers and geographic barriers (e.g., distance to such providers). Rather, the majority of youth with OCD receive psychiatric medication alone or together with unproven forms of psychotherapy. While some serotonergic medications have demonstrated utility in pediatric OCD, side effects can be common, response rates are modest at best, and symptom remission is rare. Given this, alternative ways of providing CBT need to be identified and tested to increase the number of people with access to this form of treatment. With this in mind, the proposed study examines the efficacy of a videophone based cognitive-behavioral intervention for youth with OCD. A total of 30 youth will be randomly assigned to either videophone administered CBT or an abbreviated wait-list control arm. Cognitive-behavioral therapy will be based on a demonstrated effective treatment protocol, and adapted for videophone administration. Comprehensive assessments will be conducted by trained clinicians at relevant time-points (e.g., baseline, post-treatment, follow-up) to assess symptom severity and impairment. Should supporting data be found, videophone-administered CBT would have the potential to help many more families who would otherwise remain untreated or inadequately treated. On a societal level, evaluation and dissemination of telehealth interventions such as this will lessen costs related to sustained treatment and OCD related impairment.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive-behavioral therapy

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. The psychotherapy protocol will include 14 90-minute sessions of videophone administered CBT over 12 weeks.

BEHAVIORALWait-list control

Waitlist Control. The participant and his/her parents will be instructed to not obtain treatment outside of the protocol or make medication changes/additions. This will be assessed through interview at the Post-Waitlist assessment.

Sponsors

University of South Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Principal diagnosis of OCD on the ADIS-IV-C/P and CY-BOCS Total Score ≥ 16 * No change in psychotropic medication (if applicable) for at least 8 weeks prior to study entry * 7 to 17 years old * Availability of at least one parent to accompany the child to all assessment sessions and be present for videophone sessions * Have a computer within their home

Exclusion criteria

* History of and/or current psychosis, autism, bipolar disorder, or current suicidality * Principal diagnosis other than OCD * A positive diagnosis in the caregiver of mental retardation, psychosis, or other psychiatric disorders or conditions that would limit their ability to understand CBT (based on clinical interview) * The child requires a higher level of psychiatric and/or medical care (e.g., inpatient hospitalization) * Child receptive vocabulary \< 80.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS; Scahill et al., 1997). The CY-BOCS is a 10-item Semi-structured Measure of Obsession and Compulsion Severity Over the Previous Week. This Measure Will Serve as the Primary Outcome Index.within one week after treatment condition was concludedItems on this scale are summed to arrive at a total score. Scores on this scale range from 0 to 40 with higher scores corresponding to worse symptom severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S; National Institute of Mental Health, 1985). The CGI-S is a 7-point Clinician Rating of Severity of Psychopathology.within one week after treatment condition was concludedScores on this scale range from 0 to 6 with higher scores corresponding to worse symptom severity.
Clinical Global Improvement (CGI; Guy, 1976). The CGI is a 7-point Rating of Treatment Response Anchored by 1 (Very Much Improved) and 7 (Very Much Worse).within one week after treatment condition was concludedScores on this scale range from 1 to 7. Scores of 1 (very much improved) and 2 (much improved) are grouped together to indicate if a participate has had a beneficial response to the interview. The data represents participants who had a beneficial response to the treatment condition. Scores of 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse) are grouped together to indicate that a participant has not had a positive treatment response.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cognitive-behavioral Therapy
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. The psychotherapy protocol will include 14 90-minute sessions of videophone administered CBT over 12 weeks. The first session will be held face-to-face to foster rapport. Sessions 1-4 will be held twice weekly; thereafter sessions will be held weekly. Sessions 1-3 are devoted to psychoeducation, treatment discussion, and hierarchy development. Sessions 4-10 involve CBT exercises specific to each youth. Cognitive-behavioral therapy: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. The psychotherapy protocol will include 14 90-minute sessions of videophone administered CBT over 12 weeks.
16
Waitlist
Waitlist Control. The participant and his/her parents will be instructed to not obtain treatment outside of the protocol or make medication changes/additions. This will be assessed through interview at the Post-Waitlist assessment. Wait-list control: Waitlist Control. The participant and his/her parents will be instructed to not obtain treatment outside of the protocol or make medication changes/additions. This will be assessed through interview at the Post-Waitlist assessment.
15
Total31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWaitlistCognitive-behavioral TherapyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
15 Participants16 Participants31 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous11.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.81
11 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
11.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants16 participants31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS; Scahill et al., 1997). The CY-BOCS is a 10-item Semi-structured Measure of Obsession and Compulsion Severity Over the Previous Week. This Measure Will Serve as the Primary Outcome Index.

Items on this scale are summed to arrive at a total score. Scores on this scale range from 0 to 40 with higher scores corresponding to worse symptom severity.

Time frame: within one week after treatment condition was concluded

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-behavioral TherapyChildren's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS; Scahill et al., 1997). The CY-BOCS is a 10-item Semi-structured Measure of Obsession and Compulsion Severity Over the Previous Week. This Measure Will Serve as the Primary Outcome Index.11.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.53
WaitlistChildren's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS; Scahill et al., 1997). The CY-BOCS is a 10-item Semi-structured Measure of Obsession and Compulsion Severity Over the Previous Week. This Measure Will Serve as the Primary Outcome Index.18.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.11
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S; National Institute of Mental Health, 1985). The CGI-S is a 7-point Clinician Rating of Severity of Psychopathology.

Scores on this scale range from 0 to 6 with higher scores corresponding to worse symptom severity.

Time frame: within one week after treatment condition was concluded

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-behavioral TherapyClinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S; National Institute of Mental Health, 1985). The CGI-S is a 7-point Clinician Rating of Severity of Psychopathology.1.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
WaitlistClinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S; National Institute of Mental Health, 1985). The CGI-S is a 7-point Clinician Rating of Severity of Psychopathology.2.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Clinical Global Improvement (CGI; Guy, 1976). The CGI is a 7-point Rating of Treatment Response Anchored by 1 (Very Much Improved) and 7 (Very Much Worse).

Scores on this scale range from 1 to 7. Scores of 1 (very much improved) and 2 (much improved) are grouped together to indicate if a participate has had a beneficial response to the interview. The data represents participants who had a beneficial response to the treatment condition. Scores of 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse) are grouped together to indicate that a participant has not had a positive treatment response.

Time frame: within one week after treatment condition was concluded

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cognitive-behavioral TherapyClinical Global Improvement (CGI; Guy, 1976). The CGI is a 7-point Rating of Treatment Response Anchored by 1 (Very Much Improved) and 7 (Very Much Worse).13 participants
WaitlistClinical Global Improvement (CGI; Guy, 1976). The CGI is a 7-point Rating of Treatment Response Anchored by 1 (Very Much Improved) and 7 (Very Much Worse).2 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026