Conventional Bronchoscopy Plus Rose Versus Electromagnetic Navigation (EMN) Plus Rose in Small Peripheral Lesions

Comparison of the Electromagnetic Navigation System and Rapid on Site Evaluation Versus Conventional Bronchoscopy and Rapid on Site Evaluation: Improved Yield in Small Peripheral Lung Lesions(Original Investigation)

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT00880945

Enrollment

Registered

2009-04-14

Start date

2009-05-31

Completion date

2010-05-31

Last updated

2009-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Lung Lesions, Lung Cancer, Secondary Lung Cancer

Keywords

FBS, coin lesions, ENB, ROSE

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate if Electromagnetic navigation (ENB) in combination with rapid on site evaluation (ROSE) can improve diagnostic accuracy in those patients who fail to be diagnosed with conventional fluoroscopic assisted bronchoscopy (FBS) in combination with ROSE.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 80 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* presence of small peripheral lung lesions (\< 3 cm) in patient suitable for surgical procedure

Exclusion criteria

* patient with metastatic disease * patients unfit for surgical procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate the percentages of diagnosis that can be obtained adding ENB to conventional bronchoscopy in the same patient	1 year

Countries

Italy

Outcome results