Skip to content

Semantic Memory, Financial Capacity, and Brain Perfusion in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) (CASL)

Semantic Memory, Financial Capacity and Brain Perfusion in MCI

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00880555
Acronym
CASL
Enrollment
78
Registered
2009-04-13
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2016-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, Dementia

Keywords

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Alzheimer disease, Mild cognitive impairment, Continuous arterial spin labeling, Semantic memory

Brief summary

Alzheimer's disease (AD) often manifests as a memory disorder before dementia develops. Dementia is considered to be present when a person can no longer handle complex activities of daily living, such as managing finances. This study will investigate the relationship between changes in the ability to manage finances and brain perfusion, which will be measured using continuous arterial spin-labeling (an experimental MRI). Subjects will also undergo neuropsychological tests focusing on several types of memory and thought process, with special emphasis on semantic memory. An important question to be addressed is whether changes in function are better predicted by the neuropsychological tests or by the brain scan.

Detailed description

Alzheimer's disease (AD) often manifests as a memory disorder before dementia develops. Dementia is considered to be present when a person can no longer handle complex activities of daily living, such as managing finances. This study will investigate the relationship between changes in the ability to manage finances and brain perfusion, which will be measured using continuous arterial spin-labeling (an experimental MRI). Subjects will also undergo neuropsychological tests focusing on several types of memory and thought process, with special emphasis on semantic memory. An important question to be addressed is whether changes in function are better predicted by the neuropsychological tests or by the brain scan. Participants will undergo a single MRI scan, baseline financial capacity instrument (FCI) and cognitive evaluation, and then will be followed approximately annually to repeat the functional and cognitive assessments. Linear mixed effects models will be used to fit a model predicting financial capacity based on baseline cognitive tests. Measures from the MRI scan will be added to the model to determine whether imaging improves the predictions.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Veteran or non-veteran * Age 50-89 * With normal cognition or memory impairment (MCI or mild AD) * English speaking * Right handed * Adequate vision and hearing to take part in tests * Able and willing to undergo MRI scan * Medically and psychiatrically stable * No other brain disease (such as tumor, Parkinson's disease, major stroke)

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Inability to tolerate MRI (due to metal in body or claustrophobia)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FCI Score at Follow-upYear 1, Year 2, Year 3At each research visit, participants undertook 5 portions of the Financial Capacity Instrument (Domains 2, 3, 4b, 5, and 7). We report the total FCI score across the five domains tested, which has a range of possible scores from 0-191. Higher scores reflect greater capacity for understanding financial concepts and handling financial tasks.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

All individuals underwent baseline MRI, cognitive, and functional assessment. Four individuals (2 cognitive impairment- non dementia (CIND), 1 intoxicated, 1 with non-AD dementia) determined not to fit into one of the study arms (MCI, mild AD, or cognitively normal) were not asked to return for follow up cognitive and functional assessment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1: Non-Dementia Memory Disorder
Elderly patients with non-dementia memory disorder (mild cognitive impairment)
23
Arm 2: Control
Elderly controls without memory impairment
40
Arm 3: Mild Alzheimer Disease
Patients with mild Alzheimer disease (but preserved routine activities of daily living)
11
Total74

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyDeath000001
Overall StudyLack of resources (hired rater)975000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision080210
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject110000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1: Non-Dementia Memory DisorderTotalArm 3: Mild Alzheimer DiseaseArm 2: Control
10/36 spatial recall - 1st trial4.3 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
5.0 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
4.0 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
5.6 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
10/36 spatial recall - delayed recall5.2 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
6.4 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
5.4 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
7.2 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
10/36 spatial recall - total15.9 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
17.9 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
13.8 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
20.2 positions recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Age, Continuous71.91 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.63
68.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.26
74.18 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.29
65.08 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.46
Boston Naming Test - 30 item25.6 pictures named
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
25.8 pictures named
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
21.6 pictures named
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
27.2 pictures named
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Educational level14.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.94
15.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
14.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.36
16.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.39
Extended Mini-Mental State Exam44.2 points awarded for correct items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
44.7 points awarded for correct items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
36.5 points awarded for correct items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
47.6 points awarded for correct items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
F-, A-, and S-words29.1 words generated
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
32.5 words generated
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
27.5 words generated
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
36.4 words generated
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Financial Capacity Instrument - total151.8 points awarded for correct items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
152.4 points awarded for correct items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
127.1 points awarded for correct items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.9
160.2 points awarded for correct items
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Pyramids and Palm Trees - pictures49.4 correct matches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
48.9 correct matches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
46.4 correct matches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
49.6 correct matches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Pyramids and Palm Trees - words50.0 correct matches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
49.9 correct matches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
48.4 correct matches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
50.4 correct matches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants9 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants65 Participants10 Participants34 Participants
Semantic fluency (7 categories)74.6 words generated
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.7
86.2 words generated
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.5
61.5 words generated
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.9
101.1 words generated
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants30 Participants3 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants44 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Trail Making Test - A45.4 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
44.0 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.1
77.0 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 67.7
34.7 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Trail Making Test - B132.2 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 64.4
110.8 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 63.6
178.7 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 79.2
78.8 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.5
Verbal learning - 1st immediate list A5.0 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
5.4 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
3.3 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
6.4 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Verbal learning - list B immediate recall4.5 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
4.7 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
2.7 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
5.5 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Verbal learning - long delay cued recall7.3 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
8.7 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
3.3 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
11.2 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
Verbal learning - long delay free recall5.8 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
7.5 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
1.6 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
10.3 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Verbal learning - total trials 1-535.9 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
40.5 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
23.0 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
48.7 words recalled
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 400 / 110 / 20 / 10 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 400 / 110 / 20 / 11 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

FCI Score at Follow-up

At each research visit, participants undertook 5 portions of the Financial Capacity Instrument (Domains 2, 3, 4b, 5, and 7). We report the total FCI score across the five domains tested, which has a range of possible scores from 0-191. Higher scores reflect greater capacity for understanding financial concepts and handling financial tasks.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Population: Individuals completing at least one assessment following baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Non-Dementia Memory DisorderFCI Score at Follow-upYear 2150.8 points awarded for correct itemsStandard Deviation 9
Arm 1: Non-Dementia Memory DisorderFCI Score at Follow-upYear 1147.3 points awarded for correct itemsStandard Deviation 19.7
Arm 1: Non-Dementia Memory DisorderFCI Score at Follow-upYear 393 points awarded for correct itemsStandard Deviation 0
Arm 2: ControlFCI Score at Follow-upYear 2179.0 points awarded for correct itemsStandard Deviation 6.2
Arm 2: ControlFCI Score at Follow-upYear 1164.0 points awarded for correct itemsStandard Deviation 13.3
Arm 2: ControlFCI Score at Follow-upYear 3163 points awarded for correct itemsStandard Deviation 0
Arm 3: Mild Alzheimer DiseaseFCI Score at Follow-upYear 1123.3 points awarded for correct itemsStandard Deviation 43.1
Arm 3: Mild Alzheimer DiseaseFCI Score at Follow-upYear 30 points awarded for correct itemsStandard Deviation 0
Arm 3: Mild Alzheimer DiseaseFCI Score at Follow-upYear 20 points awarded for correct itemsStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026