Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Conditions
Keywords
Acute myeloid leukemia, Priming, GM-CSF, Timed-sequential chemotherapy, Prognosis
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is: 1. To compare priming with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) during induction and consolidation courses versus no priming. 2. To compare as consolidation timed sequential chemotherapy versus four courses of high dose cytarabine.
Detailed description
Patients aged 15-50 are enrolled and randomly assigned to receive GM-CSF or no GM-CSF during all remission-induction and consolidation courses of chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy consists of a timed-sequential chemotherapy including a first sequence of chemotherapy combining daunorubicin, 80 mg/m2 per day, administered IV as a short infusion over 3 days (days 1-3), and cytarabine, 500 mg/m2 per day IV as a continuous infusion over the same period. The second sequence, administered after 4-day free interval, consists of mitoxantrone, 12 mg/m2 per day, administered IV as a short infusion over 2 days (days 8 and 9), and cytarabine, 500 mg/m2/12h, administered as a 3-hour infusion for 3 days (days 8-10). Salvage therapy consists of cytarabine, 3 g/m2/12h on days 1,3,5,7, combined with amsacrine, 100mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 3. GM-CSF (Leucomax, recombinant human GM-CSF from Escherichia Coli, Schering Plough, Kenilworth,N.J., USA) is given at a dose of 5µg/kg per day, intravenously beginning at day 1 of each chemotherapy course and continuing until the last day of chemotherapy of each course. Patients who achieve CR after induction chemotherapy or salvage therapy are randomly assigned to consolidation courses consisting of either a timed sequential chemotherapy similar to that of the ALFA-9000 trial (P2 arm) or the CALGB postremission chemotherapy (P1 arm), which includes 4 cycles of high-dose cytarabine, followed by 4 additional maintenance courses.
Interventions
DRUGGM-CSF
Randomization 1: GM-CSF (5micogram/Kg/d) versus no GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and all consolidation courses. Randomiization 2: Consolidation high dose AraC versus consolidation EMA
Sponsors
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Acute Leukemia French Association
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* A morphologically proven diagnosis of AML according to the WHO classification * Serum creatinine \< 2N; AST and ALT \< 2.5N; total bilirubin \< 2N (unless related to the underlying disease). * ECOG performance status 0 to 2. * Women of child-bearing must use acceptable contraceptive methods, and must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior the beginning treatment on this trial. * Must be able and willing to give written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with M3-AML. Patient with AML following diagnosed myeloproliferation or patient with prior history of MDS known for more than 3 months. Patients with AML secondary to previous treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy (therapy-related AML). * Patient presenting any diagnosis of uncontrolled or metastatic tumor. * Patients with uncontrolled severe infection,
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Assessing the potential value of the daily administration of GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and post-induction for analyzing and comparing the arms with and without GM-CSF: EFS, % of CR, duration of remission, OS and toxicity of each treatment. | 72 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Evaluate the effectiveness on DFS of a single course of consolidation using a very intensive sequential chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, AraC and etoposide feasible compared to 4 courses of high dose AraC followed of 4 courses of maintenance. | 72 months |
Outcome results
None listed