Skip to content

Sacral Neuromodulation Test With Bilateral First Stage Tined Lead Procedure in Patients With Non-obstructive Urinary Retention: A Pilot Study

Sacral Neuromodulation Test With Bilateral First Stage Tined Lead Procedure in Patients With Non-obstructive Urinary Retention: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00878176
Enrollment
12
Registered
2009-04-08
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2018-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Retention

Keywords

sacral neuromodulation therapy, urinary retention, screening, non obstructive urinary retention

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to determine whether bilateral sacral nerve stimulation with First stage tined lead placement test is more effective than unilateral stimulation, among patients with non obstructive urinary retention.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFirst stage tined lead procedure

bilateral first stage tined lead placement

Sponsors

Maastricht University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who signed the informed consent * Patients (male and female), aged between 18-70 years, with non obstructive urinary retention. Two specific subcategories of retention are included 1. Incomplete voiding or incomplete retention (\>100 cc residual) such as hesitancy or intermittency, that are due to an acontractile detrusor or due to urethral sphincter overactivity. The overactivity of the sphincter may occur in absence of detrusor contraction and may be the cause of the lack of detrusor activity. 2. Complete retention. These individuals are completely unable to void. All patients must have the potential for storing an adequate volume of urine: i.e., at least 100 ml

Exclusion criteria

* Known psychiatric disorders * Current or plans of pregnancy * Known neurologic diseases or impairment; including DM (severe or uncontrolled diabetes; or diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement), spinal cord injury, MS * Reiter's syndrome * Concomitant medical conditions that would limit the success of the procedure such as: active degenerative disc disease, spinal cord injury\< 6 months old, bleeding complications, CVA\< 6 months old etc. * Extra urethral incontinence * Pelvic pain of uncertain etiology that is not associated with a voiding dysfunction or where pelvic pain is the primary complaint/ diagnosis. * Anatomic obstructive voiding disorders * Current urinary tract infection * Malignancy of urinary tract * Severe grade III/ IV pelvic prolapse, cystocele, urethrocele, enterocele * Proven interstitial cystitis or clinical symptoms of interstitial cystitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is the eligibility for SNM therapy. This is defined as yes or no. A patient is eligible for the therapy when he or she can void again or the volume increased with at least 50%, and the catheterized volume is less then 100ml.3 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complete or incomplete urinary retention3 weeks

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026