Skip to content

Reliability of Point-of-care INR Measurements in Patients With Antiphospholipid-antibody Syndrome Treated With Warfarin

INR Determined by Plasma-based Methods Versus Newer Point-of-care Instruments in Patients With Antiphospholipid-antibody Syndrome Treated With Anticoagulants

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00878137
Enrollment
63
Registered
2009-04-08
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2012-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Brief summary

The antiphospholipid-antibody syndrome (APLA), which includes lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-beta-2-glycoproteinI antibodies, is a thrombophilic disorder associated with arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis or both. Patients diagnosed with APLA have a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis than do patients without known antibodies. Currently, warfarin is considered the anticoagulant of choice for prophylactic antithrombotic treatment for APLA patients after their first episode of thrombosis. In some patients with APLA who are treated with warfarin, the INR values determined on plasma are unreliable due to an influence of the APLA on the INR. In these individuals, alternative monitoring methods, such as factor II activity, chromogenic factor X activity or prothrombin-proconvertin time should be used to assess adequate anticoagulation. These tests are expensive and not widely available to some clinicians. Point-of-care (POC) instruments, on the other hand, are readily accessible to clinicians. Previous research has shown that INR values from 3 older point-of-care (POC) instruments are unreliable in 1/3 of APLA patients (CoaguChekTM, ProTimeTM, INRatioTM). However, there are now newer versions of these POC instruments available (CoaguChek XSTM, an investigational ProTime device, and a newer INRatioTM device) and it is unknown if these newer POC instruments are reliable in patients with APLA. The purpose of this study is to determine whether newer POC instruments are reliable in patients with APLA.

Interventions

DEVICEINR by point-of-care instruments and venopuncture

Three fingersticks will be performed and from each one drop of capillary or venous whole blood collected from a fingerstick performed by the primary investigator to measure PT/INR using the CoaguChekXSTM (10 microliters), ProTimeTM (27 microliters), the investigational ProTime, and INRatioTM 15 microliters) point-of-care instruments and one i.v. blood draw (20 mL of blood) will be performed by a phlebotomist.

Sponsors

International Technidyne Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

APLA Inclusion Criteria: * Prolongation of a phospholipid-dependent screening assay, 2) lack of correction of a prolonged screening assay after a 1:1 mix with pooled normal plasma, and 3) correction of a prolonged screening assay by the addition of excess phospholipid. Two positive lupus anticoagulant confirmations at least 3 months apart will be required. * Diagnosis of anticardiolipin antibodies defined as elevated levels of ACA-IgG (\>30) and/or ACA-IgM (\>15) on two separate occasions at least 3 months apart. * Stable warfarin therapy, defined as the maintenance of a warfarin dose for a minimal of 2 weeks regardless of INR. APLA

Exclusion criteria

* Patients whose warfarin dose has changed within the past 2 weeks. Control Inclusion Criteria: * No evidence of either a positive LA or ACA diagnosis by confirmation of negative laboratory values and/or documentation of no clinical signs and symptoms concurrent with these conditions. * Stable warfarin therapy, defined as the maintenance of a warfarin dose for a minimal of 2 weeks regardless of INR. Control

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026