Skip to content

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Robot-Assisted Practice of Activities of Daily Living

fMRI and Robot-Assisted Practice of Activities of Daily Living

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00878085
Enrollment
61
Registered
2009-04-08
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2014-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic, Hemiparesis, Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

Robot Therapy, Upper Limb, Stroke, Rehabilitation, fMRI, DTI

Brief summary

The investigators will study motor recovery after robot-assisted therapy after stroke. A small clinical trial will be conducted to quantify the central nervous system changes associated with robotic or standard training, and identify trends across high and low responders in terms of patterns of change in cortical activity and type of white matter connectivity.The investigators hypothesize that robot training will lead to larger improvements as compared to standard occupational therapy. The investigators hypothesize that high responders to the robot training will have reduced compensatory activation in the bilateral area and will connectivity in the motor tracts.

Detailed description

Robot-assisted therapy is on the cutting edge of stroke rehabilitation and is a therapy method that promises to improve the lives of persons with disabilities due to stroke. Preliminary studies using these tools provide mixed evidence for their effectiveness and reveal limitations. For example, inconsistent carryover of motor gains to real life activities of daily living (ADLs) is seen. Therefore, it is still not clear what treatment strategies maximize functional outcomes on ADLs. There is a need to study the stroke recovery process and to understand how to optimize robot-assisted therapies in order to enhance patient rehabilitation and improve functional outcomes. Imaging techniques such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) can assist us in understanding the stroke recovery process, in determining who may benefit from robot-assisted training, and in defining how training induced functional cortical changes occur after robot training. We propose to conduct an interventional study plus control to assess the effectiveness of four weeks of robot-assisted practice of tasks with skilled functional tasks that involve reaching and grasping activities similar to real activities. We will examine the process of recovery for low-to-moderate functioning stroke survivors with chronic disability. We will assess the ability of active-assisted reaching and grasping training to effect immediate gains and long-term functional improvements. Further, using fMRI and DTI, we plan to associate changes seen in motor impairment levels and functional task performance levels with white matter injuries and connectivity and changes in oxygen utilization in the motor cortex as well as other areas of the brain. Our short-term aims are to, i) assess short-term functional gains after practice of skilled reaching and grasping tasks; ii) assess maintenance of these improvements; iii) quantify the neuronal changes associated with short-term gains, and iv) identify trends across high and low responders in terms of patterns of change in cortical activity and type of white matter connectivity. In the long-term, we hope to improve understanding of the process of ADL functional recovery after stroke and optimize robot-training strategies leading to cerebral plasticity. We also hope to determine how lesion characteristics affect changes seen in function, white matter connectivity, and cortical activity. By, accomplishing these aims, we hope to improve upper extremity function after stroke and reduce disability.

Interventions

DEVICERobot Therapy Device

3x a week for 4 weeks

BEHAVIORALOccupational Therapy

3x a week for 4 weeks

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
US Department of Veterans Affairs
CollaboratorFED
Marquette University
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Stroke: * 30 to 85 years * Right-handed (evaluated with handedness survey) * suffered a unilateral ischemic stroke in the motor control area, which resulted in hemiparesis of the arm (confirmed by medical data), * at least 6-months post-stroke * residual movement at least (a) 15 degree shoulder flexion or adduction, (b) 15 degree active elbow flexion and extension * not claustrophobic * not depressed (as measured depression survey) * able to use the scanner, i.e., passes the fMRI screening survey * able to understand the instructions and complete the tracking tasks Control * older than 20 years * Right-handed (evaluated with survey) * not claustrophobic * able to use the scanner, i.e., passes the fMRI screening survey * able to understand the instructions and complete the tracking tasks * no history of neurological disorders --not depressed (as measured depression survey)

Exclusion criteria

Stroke: * brain stem, stroke * pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disorders * Spasticity \>3 at elbow or fingers on Ashworth * demonstrated visuospatial, language or attention deficits of a severity that prevents understanding the task * shoulder pain or joint pain during movements * synkinetic movements or mirror movements * decline to participate * will not comply with full protocol * pregnant * allergic to goretex and conductivity gel Control * decline to participate * will not comply with full protocol * pregnant * allergic to goretex and conductivity gel

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical Measures: Fugl-Meyer (Motor control), Functional Hand Evaluation (ADL), Jebsen TaylorPre (2x) , Post, Follow-Up
Biomechanical:Movement Time, Grasp Aperture, Movement SmoothnessPre (2x), Post, Follow-up
Imaging Measures: BOLD response (activation), Laterality Index, Fractional Anisotropy, Fiber Density IndexPre (1x), Post, Follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical Measures: Joint ROM, MMT, SpasticityPre(2x), Post, Follow-up
Clinical Measures: Pain, ExertionDuring Therapy

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026