Skip to content

Comparison of Three Laryngoscope Blades for Orotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room

Comparison of Performance of Three Laryngoscope Blades: Plastic Single Use, Metallic Single Use and Metallic Reusable Blades.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00876967
Acronym
Laryngotest
Enrollment
1040
Registered
2009-04-07
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2010-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation

Keywords

anesthesiology, randomized, laryngoscope, intubation, laryngeal exposition, laryngoscope blades, plastic single use blade, metallic single use blade, metallic reusable blade, success to intubation at first attempt, Cormack and lehanne modify grade

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determinate if there is a difference in performance provided by three laryngoscope blades: plastic single use, metallic single use and metallic reusable blades.

Detailed description

Primary outcome: success of intubation at the first attempt Secondary outcomes: quality of laryngeal exposition (Cormack and Lehanne modify grade), duration to success intubation, Intubation difficult Scale and result of intubation procedure

Interventions

DEVICEmetallic single use blade

metallic single use blade

DEVICEplastic single use blade

plastic single use blade

DEVICEmetallic reusable blade

metallic reusable blade

Sponsors

University Hospital, Caen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient age over 18 who need general anesthesia with orothracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* patient age under 18 or major assist * presence of upper airway malformation or abnormality * cervical or facial trauma * previous difficult intubation known * no use of curare * Body Mass Index over 30kg/m2 if crush induction use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
success of intubation at the first attemptimmediately

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
quality of laryngeal exposition (Cormack and Lehanne modify grade)immediately
duration to success intubationimmediately
Intubation difficult ScaleImmediately
result of intubation procedureimmediately

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026