Skip to content

Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG (LGG) in Children With Abdominal Pain

The Use of Lactobacillus gg in Functional Abdominal Pain in Children: a Double-blind Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00876291
Acronym
LGGDAR
Enrollment
140
Registered
2009-04-06
Start date
2004-12-31
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2011-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Abdominal Pain

Brief summary

Probiotics play an important role in preventing overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacteria and maintaining the integrity of the gut mucosal barrier. The beneficial effects of probiotics have been previously studied in adult patients with IBS. Even though most of the studies demonstrate efficacy, other studies do not support these observations. Few studies addresses the efficacy of probiotics in children with IBS. The goal of the present study was to determine whether oral administration of the probiotic Lactobacillus GG under randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions would improve symptoms of children with abdominal pain.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTLactobacillus GG (probiotic )

LGG capsules: each cp containing 3 × 109 colony forming units, CFU

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

placebo which consisted of capsules identical in taste and appearance to the active study product except for the absence of freeze-dried LGG (and cryoprotectants)

Sponsors

Clinica PEdiatrica Ospedale San Paolo Bari Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Bari
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients were considered for study inclusion, if they were 4 - 12 years of age and had if they had a pain history of at least 12 weeks (which need not be consecutive) in the preceding 12 months suggestive for IBS or FAP with no structural or metabolic abnormalities to explain the symptoms and according to the Rome II diagnostic criteria valid at the time of the design of the study. * IBS was diagnosed in presence of an abdominal discomfort or pain with at least two of three features: * relieved with defecation * onset associated with a change in stool frequency * onset associated with a change in the form (appearance) of the stool. * FAP was diagnosed in presence of symptoms of * Continuous (nearly continuous) abdominal pain * No or only occasional relation of pain with physiological events (e.g. eating, menses) * Some loss of daily functioning * The pain is not feigned (e.g. malingering) * The patient has insufficient criteria for other functional gastrointestinal disorders that would explain the abdominal pain.

Exclusion criteria

* Known concomitant psychiatric, neurological, metabolic, hepatic, renal, infectious, haematological, cardiovascular and pulmonary disease * Treatment with antibiotics/probiotics in the last 2 months * A pain history suggestive for functional dyspepsia or aerophagia or abdominal migrain * Growth failure * Gastroparesis * Gastrointestinal obstructions/stricture * Any disease that may affect bowel motility such as diabetes, connective disease or poorly controlled hypo/hyperthyrodism * Previous abdominal surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure was defined as reduction of pain (both number of episodes and intensity) at the end of the intervention.12 weeks and 20 weeks

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026