Skip to content

Multicenter Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Dermal Filler, Belotero®.

A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Dermal Filler, Belotero®, After Mid-to-Deep Dermal Implantation for Correction of Moderate to Severe Facial Wrinkles

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00876265
Enrollment
118
Registered
2009-04-06
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2013-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facial Wrinkles

Keywords

Facial wrinkles, Nasolabial fold

Brief summary

This was a study to find out how an investigational product, Belotero, compares to a second product in people with facial wrinkles, such as nasolabial folds. Nasolabial folds are wrinkles on the face that go from the outside of the nostrils to the edges of the mouth. Additionally, this study determined Belotero is safe and tolerable and corrects facial wrinkles, such as nasolabial folds.

Interventions

DEVICEBelotero

Belotero, injectable hyaluronic acid gel device, implanted into the nasolabial fold in the Treatment Phase of the study (multiple injections of 0.1 to 0.2 mL, up to a maximum of 3 mL over 2 treatment sessions). Dose was based on the severity of the wrinkle, with a maximum dose to achieve 100% correction to be administered.

DEVICEZyplast

Zyplast Collagen Implant, an injectable dermal collagen device, implanted into the nasolabial fold in the Treatment Phase of the study (average injection of 1.0 mL). Dose was based on the severity of the wrinkle, with a maximum dose to achieve 100% correction to be administered. Zyplast was obtained by each site from commercially available supplies.

Sponsors

Merz North America, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects reviewed and signed a statement of Informed Consent and a HIPAA authorization prior to initiating any study-specific procedures. In addition, subjects were asked to provide a separate release for use of their photographs in publications. Subjects could refuse the photo release without jeopardizing their eligibility to participate in the study. 2. Subjects were 18 - 75 years of age, and of any race or sex. 3. Female subjects were postmenopausal for at least 1 year, had a hysterectomy, or had a tubal ligation; or, if of childbearing potential, agreed to use an approved method of birth control throughout the study (i.e., oral/systemic contraceptives, intrauterine device \[IUD\], or spermicide in combination with a barrier method of contraception), were abstinent, or were in a monogamous relationship with a vasectomized partner; and had a negative urine pregnancy test at the screening visit. 4. Subjects had bilateral nasolabial folds with a severity score of 2 or 3 on the wrinkle SRS assessed by the blinded evaluator. 5. Each subject had an adequate understanding of the language (spoken and written English or Spanish) and was willing to comply with the study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

1. A personal history of allergic/anaphylactic reactions including hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (eg, lidocaine, etc), HA preparations, and/or gram-positive bacterial protein. 2. A known history of keloids or bleeding disorders. 3. An active inflammatory process in the nasolabial fold area (skin eruptions such as cysts, pimples, rashes, cancerous/pre-cancerous lesions, psoriasis, neurodermatitis, or any other active skin disease) or severe scarring that might interfere with study assessments. 4. Women who were pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study, or who were breast-feeding. 5. Subjects who planned to undergo major facial surgery during the course of the study (eg, rhinoplasty \[with or without implant\], facelift, congenital defect repair, etc). 6. Subjects with clinically important disease, as judged by the investigator, within 3 months of the study (eg, significant laboratory test abnormalities, myocardial infarct, stroke, cancer, connective tissue diseases \[scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematous\], systemic infection, uncontrolled diabetes, etc.), including those with medical conditions that might require the use of immunosuppressive medications during the trial (eg, severe, uncontrolled asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune diseases, etc). 7. Severe physical, neurological or mental disease. 8. Excessive facial hair that might interfere with the evaluation of the wrinkle assessments. 9. Any systemic or dermatologic disorder, which, in the opinion of the investigator,would interfere with the study results or increase the risk of adverse events (AEs). 10. Subjects who had used exclusionary medications/treatments. 11. Participation in a clinical investigation within the 30 days prior to the first planned device administration or during this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adjusted (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (SRS) Score of Each Nasolabial Fold (NLF) as Determined by the Blinded Evaluator at Week 12.Baseline and Week 12 of follow-upThe severity of the nasolabial folds was measured using the wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (SRS), where 0 = Absent, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, and 4 = Extreme, which is an ordinal scale.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The subjects in this trial were enrolled from six study centers in the United States between November 2006 and July 2007. Subjects were males or non-pregnant females aged 18 to 75 years and who had bilateral nasolabial folds with a severity of 2 or 3 (moderate to severe).

Pre-assignment details

The planned enrollment was 120 subjects; 118 subjects were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study118
Total118

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up6
Overall StudyMiscellaneous reasons4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
110 Participants
Age Continuous52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
109 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
108 / 118109 / 118
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1180 / 118

Outcome results

Primary

Adjusted (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (SRS) Score of Each Nasolabial Fold (NLF) as Determined by the Blinded Evaluator at Week 12.

The severity of the nasolabial folds was measured using the wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (SRS), where 0 = Absent, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, and 4 = Extreme, which is an ordinal scale.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 of follow-up

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) population was the analysis population which was defined as all subjects who were randomized and received at least one injection of the study device to the nasolabial folds.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BeloteroAdjusted (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (SRS) Score of Each Nasolabial Fold (NLF) as Determined by the Blinded Evaluator at Week 12.1.224 Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (SRS)Standard Error 0.111
ZyplastAdjusted (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (SRS) Score of Each Nasolabial Fold (NLF) as Determined by the Blinded Evaluator at Week 12.1.176 Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (SRS)Standard Error 0.111
Comparison: The null, H0, and the alternative hypothesis, H1, are as follows:~H0(1): adjusted mean(dadj\[i\]) ≤ -Δ versus H1(1): adjusted mean(dadj\[i\]) \> -Δ H0(2): adjusted mean(dadj\[i\]) ≤ 0 versus H1(2): adjusted mean(dadj\[i\]) \> 0 The sample size calculation was based on the following assumptions: Type I error α = 0.025 (one sided); Power = 90%; Non-inferiority margin Δ = 0.25; Estimated common standard deviation (SD) = 0.75. Under these assumptions, a total of 100 evaluable subjects were needed.p-value: 0.73395% CI: [-0.228, 0.323]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026