Skip to content

High Cut-Off Continuous Veno-venous Hemodialysis (CVVHD) in Patients Treated for Acute Renal Failure After Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)/Septic Shock

High Cut-off Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis (CVVHD) to Improve Hemodynamic Stability and Organ Function Scores in Patients Treated for Acute Renal Failure After Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)/Septic Shock

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00875888
Acronym
HICOSS
Enrollment
80
Registered
2009-04-06
Start date
2004-02-29
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, Acute, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Brief summary

This study will assess the influence of the High Cut-Off (HCO) CVVHD treatment on the disease progression in septic patients. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate whether HCO CVVHD leads to a significant improvement of the hemodynamic status (mean arterial pressure, vasopressor requirements) in septic patients in comparison to CVVHD treatment with conventional high-flux filters. For the HCO-group the investigators expect a 50% lower dosage of vasopressors needed to maintain an adequate organ perfusion.

Detailed description

Severe sepsis is a devastating disorder that results from a complex host response to insult after infection. Despite advances in intensive care technologies sepsis remains an important and life-threatening problem. Sepsis is the most common cause of death in the intensive care unit. Local or systemic release of bacteria-derived compounds, leading to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, induce systemic inflammatory reactions in septic patients. Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) such as hemodialysis (CVVHD), hemofiltration (CVVH) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with conventional high-flux membranes allow to control fluid and electrolyte balance, and to improve the hemodynamic status of the patients. However, conventional high flux membranes have a limited permeability for sepsis-associated mediators with molecular weights in the range of 15.000 to 60.000 Da. A promising approach to enhance the mediator removal is to use membranes having larger pores and permeability characteristics than those currently used in CRRT. For that purpose a High Cut-Off (HCO) membrane has been developed and is manufactured by Gambro Research.After demonstrating the safety as well as the cytokine removal effectiveness in a clinical pilot study this study will assess the influence of the HCO treatment on the disease progression in septic patients.

Interventions

dialysate flow rate 35 ml/h/kg. Blood flow rate should be aimed at 200 ml/min, but not less than 150 ml/min. Bicarbonate- or lactate-buffered solutions will be used as dialysis fluids. Study dialyzers will be changed routinely every 24 h or earlier if the filter is obstructed by clotting.

Sponsors

Gambro Dialysatoren GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Vantive Health LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Fulfilling at least two of the SIRS criteria as defined by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP)/Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Consensus Conference 2. Having signs of renal dysfunction 3. Requirement for catecholamine administration (norepinephrine or others) 4. Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score at enrolment greater than or equal to 19 and less than or equal to 30

Exclusion criteria

1. Lack of written informed consent from patients or a legally authorized surrogate 2. Duration of septic shock greater than 4 days 3. Hypoproteinemia (characterized by serum albumin less than 18 g/l) 4. End stage renal failure 5. Known active malignancy 6. Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection 7. Age younger than 18 years or older than 80 years 8. Known pregnancy 9. Immunosuppression after transplantation 10. Participation in another clinical study 11. Renal replacement therapy greater than 24 hours before randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Dosage of vasopressorsday 1 to day 5
Mean arterial pressureday before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Heart rateday before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Central venous pressureday before inclusion and day 1 to day 5

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of need for renal replacement therapy28 days
Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoreat ICU admission, at inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU)28 days
Survival28 days
Length of need for catecholamine application28 days follow up
Length of need for mechanical ventilation28 days

Countries

Austria, Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026