Skip to content

Pilot Evaluation of Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds

Pilot Evaluation of Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00874094
Enrollment
15
Registered
2009-04-02
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2013-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasolabial Folds

Keywords

nasolabial folds, platelet rich plasma, fibrin matrix, facial rhytids, dermal filler

Brief summary

Platelets are a component of blood, which contain factors which can enhance wound healing. This study proposes to evaluate the clinical response of laugh lines treated with a concentrated preparation of the subject's own platelets injected into or under the skin by taking serial photographs of the subject's face over a 12 week period. Also, the same preparation will be injected into or under the skin of the arm near the elbows, and serial biopsies will be taken over a 12 week period.

Interventions

0-2 cc of autologous platelet rich fibrin matrix injected intra and subdermally to effect nasolabial fold.

Sponsors

The New York Eye & Ear Infirmary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy adults * aged 25- 75 years * with moderate to severe nasolabial folds

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant * allergy to local anesthetics * history of bleeding disorder * active infection at the treatment site * injectable filler in the nasolabial folds within past year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Score, Between Pre-treatment and 12 Weeks Post-treatment.Difference in Measurements taken Pre-treatment and 12 weeks after treatment.Difference in wrinkle assessment score, values ranging from 0 (least noticeable) to 5 ( most noticeable) (scores on a scale)between pre-treatment and 12 weeks post-treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Scores Between Pre-treatment and 1 Weekpre-treatment to 1 week after treatmentDifference in Wrinkle Assessment Scores, values ranging from 0 (least noticeable) to 5 ( most noticeable) (scores on a scale), between Pre-treatment and 1 week
Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Score Between Pretreatment and 2 WeeksPre-treatment to 2 weeks after treatmentDifference in Wrinkle Assessment Scores, values ranging from 0 (least noticeable) to 5 ( most noticeable) (scores on a scale), between Pre-treatment and 2 weeks
Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Score Between Pretreatment and 6 WeeksPre-treatment to 6 weeks after treatmentDifference in Wrinkle Assessment Scores, values ranging from 0 (least noticeable) to 5 ( most noticeable) (scores on a scale), between Pre-treatment and 6 Weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients with moderate to severe nasolabial folds were included.

Pre-assignment details

Any patient who refused to attend all scheduled follow up visits were to be excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment With Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix
Both nasolabial folds treated with platelet rich fibrin matrix
15
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment With Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants
Age Continuous54.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.11
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Score, Between Pre-treatment and 12 Weeks Post-treatment.

Difference in wrinkle assessment score, values ranging from 0 (least noticeable) to 5 ( most noticeable) (scores on a scale)between pre-treatment and 12 weeks post-treatment.

Time frame: Difference in Measurements taken Pre-treatment and 12 weeks after treatment.

Population: Number of participants were calculated based on need to achieve 1 unit improvement of Wrinkle Assessment score over baseline (pre-treatment) to be clinically relevant.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment With Platelet Rich Fibrin MatrixDifference in Wrinkle Assessment Score, Between Pre-treatment and 12 Weeks Post-treatment.1.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Secondary

Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Score Between Pretreatment and 2 Weeks

Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Scores, values ranging from 0 (least noticeable) to 5 ( most noticeable) (scores on a scale), between Pre-treatment and 2 weeks

Time frame: Pre-treatment to 2 weeks after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment With Platelet Rich Fibrin MatrixDifference in Wrinkle Assessment Score Between Pretreatment and 2 Weeks.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Secondary

Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Score Between Pretreatment and 6 Weeks

Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Scores, values ranging from 0 (least noticeable) to 5 ( most noticeable) (scores on a scale), between Pre-treatment and 6 Weeks

Time frame: Pre-treatment to 6 weeks after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment With Platelet Rich Fibrin MatrixDifference in Wrinkle Assessment Score Between Pretreatment and 6 Weeks1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Secondary

Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Scores Between Pre-treatment and 1 Week

Difference in Wrinkle Assessment Scores, values ranging from 0 (least noticeable) to 5 ( most noticeable) (scores on a scale), between Pre-treatment and 1 week

Time frame: pre-treatment to 1 week after treatment

Population: The number of participants required to demonstrate a 1 point difference between pre and post treatment values

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment With Platelet Rich Fibrin MatrixDifference in Wrinkle Assessment Scores Between Pre-treatment and 1 Week.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026