Skip to content

A Trial to Compare Three Methods of Performing Hysterosalpingography

A Prospective, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and the Tolerability of Three Methods of Performing Hysterosalpingography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00870935
Enrollment
222
Registered
2009-03-27
Start date
2007-08-31
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2010-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

Balloon catheter, Cervical vacuum cup, Hysterosalpingography, Infertility, Pain, Fallopian Tube Patency Tests, Female Infertility

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is: * to determine whether the choice of the device for performing hysterosalpingography on the basis of the cervix characteristics can reduce the procedure failure rate; * to determine whether patient medical history is correlated with the degree of pain experienced during the HSG procedure.

Detailed description

A group of women will be randomized to undergo HSG, using 1) a balloon catheter in a first group of patients; 2) a cervical vacuum cup in a second group; 3) one of the two devices decided by the operator depending on the cervix characteristics in a third group (that will be named operator's choice). The operator will ask the woman to evaluate the degree of pain experienced during the application of the device and the injection of the contrast, after 2, 6 and 24 hours. The degree of pain will be evaluated using the VAS system, an analogue scale rating from 1 to 10. A nurse will notice the patient's reaction and will evaluate the pain, depending on the movements of the hands and the body and the woman's moaning. Moreover, the assistant will note down the personal data and the history of the patient. The operator will record the objective and subjective difficulty of the performance, using a rating scale from 0 to 9. The length of the procedure, the volume of contrast used, the amount of radiations and the time of exposure of the patient will also be considered. At the end of HSG both the gynaecologist and the radiologist will express their satisfaction upon the examination with a score from 0 to 10.

Interventions

Hysterosalpingography is performed using intrauterine balloon catheter

PROCEDURECervical vacuum cup

Hysterosalpingography is performed using cervical vacuum cup

Sponsors

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* infertility

Exclusion criteria

* hypersensitivity to iodine or radio-opaque contrast dye * cervicitis * genital bleeding * genital malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
failure rate to complete hysterosalpingography (HSG)two years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the subjective difficulty to perform HSGtwo years
the fluoroscopic timetwo years
the length of the procedure of device applicationtwo years
the volume of contrast medium usedtwo years
gynecologist satisfaction with the proceduretwo years
the objective difficulty to perform HSGtwo years
the percentage of short-term complicationstwo years
the percentage of long-term complicationstwo years
correlation between patient medical history and the degree of pain experienced during the HSG proceduretwo years
the degree of pain experienced during the HSG proceduretwo years
radiologist satisfaction with the proceduretwo years

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026