Skip to content

Ultrabrief Pulsewidth Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)

A Controlled Study of Ultrabrief Pulsewidth ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00870805
Acronym
UB ECT
Enrollment
150
Registered
2009-03-27
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2013-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) remains essential to contemporary psychiatric practice and is one of the safest and most effective treatments available for depression. Despite modern advances in pharmacotherapy, about 15-20 per cent of all hospitalised patients receive treatment with ECT. Its use, however, is limited by concerns over associated cognitive side effects. Recent research has suggested that using an ultrabrief pulsewidth with ECT may greatly reduce cognitive side effects, while maintaining efficacy (Sackeim et al 2008). Preliminary results were positive for unilateral ECT, however, suggest that for bilateral ECT, dosing may need to be adjusted to preserve efficacy while reducing side effects. This study will examine the relative cognitive side effects and efficacy of right unilateral and bilateral ECT given with a standard pulsewidth or an ultrabrief pulsewidth. Some participants will also receive an MRI scan before and after ECT.

Interventions

PROCEDUREbilateral ultrabrief ECT

Bilateral ECT at 3-4 times seizure threshold with an ultrabrief pulse (0.3ms)

PROCEDUREbilateral standard ECT

Bilateral ECT with at 1.5 times seizure threshold with a standard pulse (1.0ms)

PROCEDUREright-unilateral ultrabrief ECT

Right-unilateral ECT at 6 times seizure threshold with an ultrabrief pulse (0.3ms)

PROCEDUREright-unilateral standard ECT

Right-unilateral ECT with at 5 times seizure threshold with a standard pulse (1.0ms)

Sponsors

Northside Clinic, Australia
CollaboratorOTHER
The Melbourne Clinic, Australia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
St George Hospital, Australia
CollaboratorOTHER
Wandene Private Hospital, Australia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The University of New South Wales
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects meet criteria for a DSM-IV-TR Major Depressive Episode * Total MADRS score \>/= 25 * Age \>/= 18 years * Educated or working in an English medium setting

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis (as defined by DSM-IV-TR) of any psychotic disorder (lifetime with exception of Major Depressive Episode with psychotic features); rapid cycling bipolar disorder, eating disorder (current or within the past year); obsessive compulsive disorder (lifetime); post-traumatic stress disorder (current or within the past year). * history of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence (as per DSM-IV-TR) in the last 6 months (except nicotine and caffeine). * ECT in last 3 months * Subject requires an urgent clinical response due to inanition, psychosis or high suicide risk * unable to give informed consent * score \< 24 on Mini Mental State Examination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in scores on Memory TestsBefore ECT, after 6 ECT treatments, after final ECT treatment, one month and six month follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in scores on Depression Rating ScaleBefore ECT, after each week of treatment, at the end of the ECT course

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026