Skip to content

A Study of the Efficacy of Prolonged-Release Melatonin Versus Placebo in Diabetic Patients Suffering From Insomnia

A Randomized Double-Blind, Crossover Study Comparing the Efficacy of Prolonged-Release Melatonin Versus Placebo in a 3 Week Treatment of Diabetic Patients Suffering From Insomnia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00869128
Enrollment
36
Registered
2009-03-25
Start date
1995-11-30
Completion date
1997-03-31
Last updated
2009-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Insomnia

Keywords

melatonin, insomnia, diabetes, sleep

Brief summary

Objective - Type 2 uncontrolled diabetic patients often have low endogenous melatonin and suffer from sleep disorders. The effect of a prolonged-release melatonin (PRM) formulation on glucose lipid metabolism and sleep is studied in type 2 diabetes patients with insomnia.

Detailed description

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, the subjects were treated for 3 weeks with 1 tablet per night of 2 mg prolonged-release melatonin or placebo, with one week washout period in between. Sleep was objectively monitored by wrist actigraphy. Fasting glucose, fructosamine, insulin, C-peptide, triglycerides, cholesterol (total, HDL and LDL) and some antioxidants were assessed at baseline and end of each period.

Interventions

2 mg prolonged-release melatonin

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Neurim Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diabetic patients with proven presence of the disease who complained of insomnia.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with liver or renal problems (serum creatinine above 1.5 mg/dL).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Efficiency3 weeksSleep efficiency is the percentage of time patients were asleep while in bed as scored by the actigraphic sleep algorithm assessed in the 3 consecutive last nights of each period

Participant flow

Recruitment details

36 independently living patients who complained of insomnia and suffered from type 2 diabetes (16 treated with oral hypoglycemic agents and 20 on insulin) entered the study.

Pre-assignment details

Patients with liver or renal disease (serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or higher) were excluded. All 36 patients were randomized and all concluded the crossover randomized and extension parts of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Entire Study Population
Subjects were treated for 3 weeks with 1 tablet per night of Placebo or Circadin and then 3 weeks of Circadin or Placebo, respectively.
36
Total36

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studylack of Compliance66

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEntire Study Population
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
22 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants
Age Continuous63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Region of Enrollment
Israel
36 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Outcome results

Primary

Sleep Efficiency

Sleep efficiency is the percentage of time patients were asleep while in bed as scored by the actigraphic sleep algorithm assessed in the 3 consecutive last nights of each period

Time frame: 3 weeks

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSleep Efficiency79.5 Percentage of time asleepStandard Deviation 9.6
CircadinSleep Efficiency83.1 Percentage of time asleepStandard Deviation 11.3
Comparison: ANOVA, The effect of Circadin was checked by means of 2 x 2 mixed design analysis of variance for repeated measurement.p-value: 0.04ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026