Skip to content

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of MK-3577 in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (MK-3577-009)

A Phase IIa, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo- and Active-Comparator Controlled, Cross-Over Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of MK-3577 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00868790
Enrollment
118
Registered
2009-03-25
Start date
2009-03-24
Completion date
2010-07-13
Last updated
2018-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

This study assessed the safety and efficacy of MK-3577. The primary efficacy hypothesis was that, after 4 weeks of treatment, either the morning (AM) administration or the evening (PM) administration of MK-3577 provides superior reduction of 24-hour weighted mean glucose (WMG) levels compared to placebo (PLA). The primary safety hypothesis was that MK-3577 is well tolerated compared to placebo.

Detailed description

This was a 4-period/5-treatment crossover study. Each period was 4 weeks. The 5 treatments consisted of MK-3577 10 mg once daily (QD) in the AM, MK-3577 6 mg QD in the evening (PM), MK-3577 25 mg twice daily (BID), metformin 1000 mg BID, and placebo to MK-3577/placebo to metformin. Participants were to be randomized to one of 14 treatment sequence arms. A subset of participants in each group was to domicile (stay overnight) at selected clinical sites at Baseline, Week 4 (end of Period 1), and Week 8 (end of Period 2) to undergo 24-hr blood sample.

Interventions

DRUGMK-3577

MK-3577 oral tablets totaling 6 mg in the evening (PM), 10 mg in the morning (AM), or 25 mg twice daily (BID) depending upon randomization, administered during a 4 week treatment period.

DRUGPlacebo to MK-3577

Dose-matched placebo tablets to MK-3577 administered during a 4 week treatment period

DRUGMetformin

Two 500 mg tablets of metformin were administered twice daily (2000 mg total daily dose) to domiciled participants during a 4 week treatment period.

Two placebo tablets to metformin were administered twice daily (2000 mg total daily dose) to domiciled participants during a 4 week treatment period.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant has type 2 diabetes * Participant is either not taking antihyperglycemic medications for the last 10 weeks OR is taking a single oral antihyperglycemic medication (but not a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma \[PPARg\] agonist) OR is taking a low-dose combination oral antihyperglycemic medication (not a PPARg agonist) at dose less than or equal to 50% of the maximum dose * Female participant is unable to have children

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has a history of type 1 diabetes or ketoacidosis * Participant has been treated with a PPARg agonist in the last 12 weeks * Participant has been treated with insulin in the last 12 weeks * Participant has had prescription lipid-modifying drug therapy in the last 12 weeks * Participant has a history of coronary artery disease * Participant has had a stroke or transient ischemic attack * Participant has congestive heart failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Weighted Mean Glucose (WMG)Week 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit, Week 8 VisitThe primary efficacy outcome in this study was the assessment of 24-hour weighted mean glucose (WMG) levels for domiciled participants after 4-week treatment (Periods 1 and 2 only). At selected study sites, a subset of participants domiciled (stayed) overnight and underwent 24-hour blood sampling at the Week 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit (end of Period 1), and Week 8 Visit (end of Period 2). Domiciled participants were not expected to follow a weight-maintaining diet while receiving standard meals from a dietician or licensed healthcare professional. WMG was calculated as the weighted average value of the glucose from the 24-hour blood sample (for Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8) and analyzed using a Longitudinal Data Analysis (LDA) model. Results were expressed as the change from baseline after 4-week treatment in 24-hour WMG.
Number of Participants With At Least One Adverse Event (AE) in the Treatment or Post-Treatment PeriodsFrom first dose of study treatment (Week 0 Visit) to Week 18 Post-study Visit (up to 18 weeks).An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, is also an AE.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AEFrom first dose of study treatment (Week 0 Visit) to Week 16 Visit (up to 16 weeks).An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, is also an AE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit, Week 8 Visit, Week 12 Visit, Week 16 VisitFasting blood samples were obtained during study site visits at Baseline (Week 0 Visit) and Week 4 of each treatment period (Week 4 Visit, Week 8 Visit, Week 12 Visit, Week 16 Visit). Participants were counseled to fast (no food or drink except water and non-study medications, as directed) for at least 12 hours prior to all study visits. FPG was analyzed using an LDA model, and change from baseline (Week 0) after 4-week treatment in FPG was reported.
Change From BL After 4-Week Treatment in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) LevelsWeek 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit, Week 8 visitTwo-hour PMG was analyzed in both non-domiciled and domiciled participants. Non-domiciled participants completed a 3-point meal tolerance test (MTT) at Week 0 (Baseline) and Week 4 Visits of Treatment Period 1. Participants completed 12-hr fasting prior to the Week 0 (Baseline) and Week-4 clinic visits. Fasting blood samples were obtained at the beginning of these clinic visits, after which participants consumed a standardized meal (1 nutrition bar and 1 can of nutrition drink), and then completed the MTT, in which plasma glucose was measured at 30 min and 120 min (2 hr) post-meal. The 2-hr PMG data also include data from domiciled participants, based on 2-hr post-morning meal glucose levels in the 24-hr blood glucose sample at the Week 4 and Week 8 Visits. The 2-hour PMG was analyzed using an LDA model, and change from baseline (Week 0) after 4-week treatment in 2-hour PMG was reported.
Percentage Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Low-Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) LevelsWeek 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit, Week 8 Visit, Week 12 Visit, and Week 16 VisitBlood samples were obtained from all participants to measure LDL-C levels at Week 0 (Baseline) and Week 4 of each treatment period (Week 4 Visit, Week 8 Visit, Week 12 Visit, and Week 16 Visit). For each visit, LDL-C was measured over 2 days. The average of duplicate measurements (when available) was used in the analysis.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 118 participants were randomized to one of 14 treatment sequence arms on this cross-over study. Each participant received 4 out of 5 treatments over 4 treatment periods. Before randomization, participants who had prior antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) treatment had a 4-week AHA wash-off, and all participants had a 2-week placebo run-in.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Randomized Participants
All randomized participants who took at least one dose of study treatment
118
Total118

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011FG012FG013
Period 1Abnormal Triglycerides00001000000000
Period 1Adverse Event10000003100001
Period 1Lost to Follow-up00000100000000
Period 1Protocol Violation10000000000000
Period 1Withdrawal by Subject01000000000001
Period 2Adverse Event00000000100000
Period 2Lost to Follow-up01000100000000
Period 2Withdrawal by Subject00000000100001
Period 3Adverse Event00000000010000
Period 3Protocol Violation00000000001000
Period 3Study Terminated by Sponsor00010000000000
Period 4Abnormal ALT/AST00100000000000
Period 4Adverse Event00000001001010
Period 4Lost to Follow-up00000001000000
Period 4Study Terminated by Sponsor20000001202101
Post-studyExcluded Medication00000002010000
Post-studyWithdrawal by Subject00001000000000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Randomized Participants
Age, Continuous54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 1084 / 1063 / 1055 / 896 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1082 / 1062 / 1050 / 890 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Weighted Mean Glucose (WMG)

The primary efficacy outcome in this study was the assessment of 24-hour weighted mean glucose (WMG) levels for domiciled participants after 4-week treatment (Periods 1 and 2 only). At selected study sites, a subset of participants domiciled (stayed) overnight and underwent 24-hour blood sampling at the Week 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit (end of Period 1), and Week 8 Visit (end of Period 2). Domiciled participants were not expected to follow a weight-maintaining diet while receiving standard meals from a dietician or licensed healthcare professional. WMG was calculated as the weighted average value of the glucose from the 24-hour blood sample (for Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8) and analyzed using a Longitudinal Data Analysis (LDA) model. Results were expressed as the change from baseline after 4-week treatment in 24-hour WMG.

Time frame: Week 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit, Week 8 Visit

Population: All randomized domiciled participants receiving ≥1 dose of therapy and having 24-hour WMG measurement either at BL or end of Treatment Period 1 or 2. Number of Participants Analyzed=number of participants included in LDA model. Participants in MK-3577 25 mg BID group did not undergo 24-hour glucose sampling and were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PLA)Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Weighted Mean Glucose (WMG)-1.6 mg/dLStandard Error 4.1
MK-3577 AMChange From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Weighted Mean Glucose (WMG)-18.8 mg/dLStandard Error 6.8
MK-3577 PMChange From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Weighted Mean Glucose (WMG)-25.0 mg/dLStandard Error 6.7
METF BIDChange From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Weighted Mean Glucose (WMG)-36.5 mg/dLStandard Error 6.1
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: 0.01390% CI: [-28.3, -6.1]LDA Model
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: <0.00190% CI: [-34.5, -12.4]LDA Model
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-44.8, -25]LDA Model
Primary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, is also an AE.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Week 0 Visit) to Week 16 Visit (up to 16 weeks).

Population: All randomized participants who took ≥1 dose of study treatment (N=118). Because this was a cross-over study, participants were counted in more than one treatment group. AEs were reported by the treatment that participants were receiving at the time of the event. Not all participants received all treatments.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (PLA)Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE2 Participants
MK-3577 AMNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE2 Participants
MK-3577 PMNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE2 Participants
MK-3577 BIDNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE3 Participants
METF BIDNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With At Least One Adverse Event (AE) in the Treatment or Post-Treatment Periods

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, is also an AE.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Week 0 Visit) to Week 18 Post-study Visit (up to 18 weeks).

Population: All randomized participants who took ≥1 dose of study treatment (N=118). Because this was a cross-over study, participants were counted in more than one treatment group. AEs were reported by the treatment that participants were receiving at the time of the event. Not all participants received all treatments.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (PLA)Number of Participants With At Least One Adverse Event (AE) in the Treatment or Post-Treatment Periods28 Participants
MK-3577 AMNumber of Participants With At Least One Adverse Event (AE) in the Treatment or Post-Treatment Periods30 Participants
MK-3577 PMNumber of Participants With At Least One Adverse Event (AE) in the Treatment or Post-Treatment Periods22 Participants
MK-3577 BIDNumber of Participants With At Least One Adverse Event (AE) in the Treatment or Post-Treatment Periods28 Participants
METF BIDNumber of Participants With At Least One Adverse Event (AE) in the Treatment or Post-Treatment Periods6 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Fasting blood samples were obtained during study site visits at Baseline (Week 0 Visit) and Week 4 of each treatment period (Week 4 Visit, Week 8 Visit, Week 12 Visit, Week 16 Visit). Participants were counseled to fast (no food or drink except water and non-study medications, as directed) for at least 12 hours prior to all study visits. FPG was analyzed using an LDA model, and change from baseline (Week 0) after 4-week treatment in FPG was reported.

Time frame: Week 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit, Week 8 Visit, Week 12 Visit, Week 16 Visit

Population: All randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of therapy and having FPG measurement either at BL or end of Treatment Period. Number of Participants Analyzed=number of participants included in the LDA model.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PLA)Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)4.3 mg/dLStandard Error 3.8
MK-3577 AMChange From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-7.2 mg/dLStandard Error 3.5
MK-3577 PMChange From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-17.5 mg/dLStandard Error 3.5
MK-3577 BIDChange From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-31.7 mg/dLStandard Error 3.5
METF BIDChange From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-14.4 mg/dLStandard Error 6.2
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: 0.00290% CI: [-17.5, -5.4]LDA Model
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: <0.00190% CI: [-27.8, -15.8]LDA Model
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: <0.00190% CI: [-42, -30]LDA Model
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: 0.00190% CI: [-30, -10.1]LDA Model
Secondary

Change From BL After 4-Week Treatment in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) Levels

Two-hour PMG was analyzed in both non-domiciled and domiciled participants. Non-domiciled participants completed a 3-point meal tolerance test (MTT) at Week 0 (Baseline) and Week 4 Visits of Treatment Period 1. Participants completed 12-hr fasting prior to the Week 0 (Baseline) and Week-4 clinic visits. Fasting blood samples were obtained at the beginning of these clinic visits, after which participants consumed a standardized meal (1 nutrition bar and 1 can of nutrition drink), and then completed the MTT, in which plasma glucose was measured at 30 min and 120 min (2 hr) post-meal. The 2-hr PMG data also include data from domiciled participants, based on 2-hr post-morning meal glucose levels in the 24-hr blood glucose sample at the Week 4 and Week 8 Visits. The 2-hour PMG was analyzed using an LDA model, and change from baseline (Week 0) after 4-week treatment in 2-hour PMG was reported.

Time frame: Week 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit, Week 8 visit

Population: All randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of therapy and having MTT measurement either at Week 0 (BL) or end of Treatment Period 1. N=number of participants included in the Longitudinal Data Analysis (LDA) model

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PLA)Change From BL After 4-Week Treatment in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) Levels-5.2 mg/dLStandard Error 5.9
MK-3577 AMChange From BL After 4-Week Treatment in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) Levels-20.1 mg/dLStandard Error 10.3
MK-3577 PMChange From BL After 4-Week Treatment in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) Levels-25.6 mg/dLStandard Error 10.2
MK-3577 BIDChange From BL After 4-Week Treatment in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) Levels-73.0 mg/dLStandard Error 9.3
METF BIDChange From BL After 4-Week Treatment in 2-hour Post-Meal Glucose (PMG) Levels-54.6 mg/dLStandard Error 10.3
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: 0.17490% CI: [-33, 3.2]LDA Model
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: 0.06390% CI: [-38.4, -2.4]LDA Model
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: <0.00190% CI: [-96.4, -59.8]LDA Model
Comparison: Analysis based on an LDA model including terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). The LDA-model test was conducted at alpha level=0.10 (two sided).p-value: <0.00190% CI: [-66.9, -31.8]LDA Model
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Low-Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) Levels

Blood samples were obtained from all participants to measure LDL-C levels at Week 0 (Baseline) and Week 4 of each treatment period (Week 4 Visit, Week 8 Visit, Week 12 Visit, and Week 16 Visit). For each visit, LDL-C was measured over 2 days. The average of duplicate measurements (when available) was used in the analysis.

Time frame: Week 0 Visit (Baseline), Week 4 Visit, Week 8 Visit, Week 12 Visit, and Week 16 Visit

Population: All randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment and had a valid reading at timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PLA)Percentage Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Low-Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) Levels2.3 percentage change from BL90% Confidence Interval 25
MK-3577 AMPercentage Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Low-Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) Levels1.5 percentage change from BL90% Confidence Interval 27.9
MK-3577 PMPercentage Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Low-Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) Levels6.8 percentage change from BL90% Confidence Interval 27.9
MK-3577 BIDPercentage Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Low-Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) Levels10.0 percentage change from BL90% Confidence Interval 21.8
METF BIDPercentage Change From Baseline (BL) After 4-Week Treatment in Low-Density Lipoprotein C (LDL-C) Levels-1.7 percentage change from BL90% Confidence Interval 23.4
Comparison: LDL-C values after log transformation were analyzed using a constrained LDA model that included terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). Percentage change from baseline in LDL-C after 4-week treatment was reported, after back-transformation using the delta method with an alpha-level of 0.10 (2-sided).p-value: 0.74290% CI: [-4.6, 3.1]LDA Model
Comparison: LDL-C values after log transformation were analyzed using a constrained LDA model that included terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). Percentage change from baseline in LDL-C after 4-week treatment was reported, after back-transformation using the delta method with an alpha-level of 0.10 (2-sided).p-value: 0.0690% CI: [0.6, 8.4]LDA Model
Comparison: LDL-C values after log transformation were analyzed using a constrained LDA model that included terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). Percentage change from baseline in LDL-C after 4-week treatment was reported, after back-transformation using the delta method with an alpha-level of 0.10 (2-sided).p-value: 0.00290% CI: [3.8, 11.7]LDA Model
Comparison: LDL-C values after log transformation were analyzed using a constrained LDA model that included terms for treatment, period, the interaction of treatment by period, prior antihyperglycemic therapy status (yes/no), and randomization stratum (participation in domiciled visits \[yes/no\]). Percentage change from baseline in LDL-C after 4-week treatment was reported, after back-transformation using the delta method with an alpha-level of 0.10 (2-sided).p-value: 0.24890% CI: [-10.2, 2.3]LDA Model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026