Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of TRO19622 as add-on Therapy to Riluzole Versus Placebo in Treatment of Patients Suffering From ALS

Phase II/III, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of TRO19622 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Patients Treated With Riluzole

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00868166
Acronym
MITOTARGET
Enrollment
512
Registered
2009-03-24
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2020-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, TRO19622, Trophos

Brief summary

The purpose of the assay is to assess the safety and the efficacy of TRO19622 330 mg QD as add-on therapy to riluzole 50 mg bid in the treatment of patients suffering from ALS, as compared to placebo, assessed by the 18-month survival rate.

Detailed description

A stand alone treatment with TRO19622 is not acceptable for ethical reasons. Riluzole is an approved and widely used ALS treatment in the European community, in Japan and in the USA. Therefore, in this study, TRO19622 will be assessed as add-on to riluzole in patients suffering from ALS. At the start of the study, patients will be randomized to one of two groups : TRO19622 (330 mg QD or placebo (once a day). Each treatment will be administered for 18 months under double-blind conditions. The product under evaluation will be administered to patients receiving the standard of care for ALS, including riluzole. Riluzole dosage (50 mg bid) must be stable and well tolerated for at least one month prior to inclusion into the study. After the double-blind period, open-label administration of TRO19622 will be allowed for safety and survival assessments and until efficacy results are available. A separate open-label protocol will be written 6 months after the randomization of the last patient into the study.

Interventions

2 capsules of TRO19622 (330mg) once a day with the noon meal as add-on therapy to riluzol 50mg bid

DRUGPlacebo Comparator

2 capsules of Placebo once a day with the noon meal as add-on therapy to riluzole 50mg bid

DRUGRiluzole

Riluzole given as add-on therapy 50mg bid

Sponsors

European Commission
CollaboratorOTHER
Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with sporadic or familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis * Patients with a clinical diagnosis of laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite ALS according to the modified El Escorial criteria8. * Have signed an Informed Consent to participate to the trial before any study related procedure has taken place. * Be of age \>18 (exclusive) and \< 80 years (inclusive). * If a female, not lactating, has a negative pregnancy test and agrees to use an effective method of birth control. * Onset of ALS Symptoms (weakness) for more than 6 months (inclusive) and less than 36 months(inclusive). * Slow vital capacity (SVC), measured three times, one of the measure being \>/= 70% of that predicted. * Treated with riluzole at the stable dose of 50 mg bid for at least 30 days before enrolment.

Exclusion criteria

* Tracheostomy, invasive ventilation, or non invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). * Gastrostomy. * Evidence of major psychiatric disorder or clinically evident dementia. * Diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disease in addition to ALS. * Have a current medication that could interfere with TRO19622 pharmacokinetics: tamoxifene. * Have current medications that could interfere with TRO19622 absorption such as ezetimibe, bile salts chelators (cholesteramine), fibrates, phytosterols, niacin (vitamin B3),fish oils. Have a current medication of lipid lowering agents other than statins. * Known hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug. * Patients with known intolerance or contra-indication to riluzole. * Have a recent history (within the previous 6 months) or current evidence of alcohol or drug abuse. * Have concurrent unstable disease involving any system eg, carcinoma other than basal cell carcinoma, any cardiac dysrhythmia, myocardial infarction, clinical or ECG signs of myocardial ischemia, cardiac insufficiency, angina symptoms, current symptoms of Coronary Artery Disease, or any other condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the patient unsuitable for study participation. . In Germany: Have any cardiac dysrhythmia, myocardial infarction, clinical or ECG signs of myocardial ischemia, cardiac insufficiency, angina symptoms, current symptoms of Coronary Artery Disease or any cardiovascular illness known or identified at the screening or inclusion visits, or have concurrent unstable disease involving any system eg, carcinoma other than basal cell carcinoma or any other condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the patient unsuitable for study participation. * Having a baseline QTc (Bazett) \> 450 msec for males and \> 470 msec for females. * Patients with known hepatitis B/C or HIV positive serology. * Be pregnant female or lactating. * Have renal impairment defined as blood creatinine \> 1:5 X upper limit of normal. * Have hepatic impairment and/or liver enzymes (ALAT or ASAT) \> 3 X ULN. * Hemostasis disorders or current treatment with oral anticoagulants. * Be possibly dependent on the Investigator or the Sponsor (eg, including, but not limited to, affiliated employee). * Participated in any other investigational drug or therapy study with a non approved medication, within the previous 3 months. * Patients without Social Security Insurance (France).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival Rate at 18 MonthsFrom the date of randomization until the date of death or last follow-up censored at 18 months (548 days)Overall survival was defined from the date of randomization until the date of death (event) or last known alive date (censored). If the death date was after 18 months, the participant was censored at 18 months (548 days). Participants still alive at or after 18 months were censored at 18 months/ 548 days. All data over the 18-month follow-up period after randomization, and participant survival status at the 18-month follow-up visit for participants who withdrew prematurely from the study for reasons other than death were included.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Inclusion, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15 and Month 18The ALSFRS-R is an ordinal rating scale (0 through 4) used to determine the ALS participant's self assessment of their ability and need for assistance in 12 activities or functions. This is a validated scale, both in person and by phone, which provides a total score from four sub-scores which assess speech and swallowing, (bulbar function), use of upper extremities (cervical function), gait and turning in bed (lumbar function), and breathing (respiratory function). Total scores range from 0 (most impaired) to 48 (normal ability).
Percentage of Participants With a Global ALS FRS-R Score of <30 or DeathMonth 18 (548 days)Percentage of participants with a global ALS FRS-R score of \< 30 or death was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method in the ITT, with a two-tailed log-rank, both stratified by site of onset (bulbar or spinal) and non-stratified. The ALSFRS-R is an ordinal rating scale (0 through 4) used to determine the ALS participant's self assessment of their ability and need for assistance in 12 activities or functions. This is a validated scale, both in person and by phone, which provides a total score from four sub-scores which assess speech and swallowing, (bulbar function), use of upper extremities (cervical function), gait and turning in bed (lumbar function), and breathing (respiratory function). Total scores range from 0 (most impaired) to 48 (normal ability).
Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedBaseline, Inclusion, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15 and Month 18SVC as a percent of the predicted value was evaluated and reported.
Percentage of Participants With Failure Over 18 MonthsFrom randomization to the time of the first event to consider at 18 months (548 days)Time to failure was defined as the time from randomization to the time of the first event to consider (Tracheostomy, invasive ventilation \[IV\] or non invasive ventilation \[NIV\])
Global Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsInclusion, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15 and Month 18MMT score involved the examination of 30 items. These 30 items are scored from 0 (no trace of contraction) to 5 (normal power at first try). The global score is the sum of the item scores and can range from 0 to 150. Higher score indicates some power.
The Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleInclusion, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15 and Month 18The single-item McGill quality of life scale evaluated the following question Considering all parts of my life - physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and financial - over the past two (2) days, the quality of my life has been…as a score of 1 to 10 on a visual analog scale where 0 is very bad and 10 is excellent.
Percentage of Participants With SVC Percent Predicted <70% or Had Died Over 18 MonthsMonth 18 (548 days)

Countries

Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Olesoxime
2 capsules of TRO19622 (330mg) once a day with the noon meal as add-on therapy to riluzole 50mg bid. Olesoxime: 2 capsules of TRO19622 (330mg) once a day with the noon meal as add-on therapy to riluzole 50mg bid. Riluzole: Riluzole given as add-on therapy 50mg bid.
259
Placebo Comparator
2 capsules of Placebo once a day with the noon meal as add-on therapy to riluzole 50mg bid Placebo Comparator: 2 capsules of Placebo once a day with the noon meal as add-on therapy to riluzole 50mg bid Riluzole: Riluzole given as add-on therapy 50mg bid
253
Total512

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event910
Overall StudyDeath5865
Overall StudyLack of efficacy, logistics, unwell910
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyNon-compliance with IMP11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3325

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOlesoximePlacebo ComparatorTotal
Age, Continuous57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
55.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
113 Participants108 Participants221 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
73 Participants74 Participants147 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
33 Participants34 Participants67 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
27 Participants25 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
92 Participants89 Participants181 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
167 Participants164 Participants331 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
79 / 25980 / 253
other
Total, other adverse events
98 / 259101 / 253
serious
Total, serious adverse events
68 / 25965 / 253

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival Rate at 18 Months

Overall survival was defined from the date of randomization until the date of death (event) or last known alive date (censored). If the death date was after 18 months, the participant was censored at 18 months (548 days). Participants still alive at or after 18 months were censored at 18 months/ 548 days. All data over the 18-month follow-up period after randomization, and participant survival status at the 18-month follow-up visit for participants who withdrew prematurely from the study for reasons other than death were included.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death or last follow-up censored at 18 months (548 days)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants irrespective of study medication administration and eligibility status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OlesoximeOverall Survival Rate at 18 Months67.5 percentage of partcipants
Placebo ComparatorOverall Survival Rate at 18 Months69.4 percentage of partcipants
p-value: 0.71Stratified Log-Rank Test
Secondary

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)

The ALSFRS-R is an ordinal rating scale (0 through 4) used to determine the ALS participant's self assessment of their ability and need for assistance in 12 activities or functions. This is a validated scale, both in person and by phone, which provides a total score from four sub-scores which assess speech and swallowing, (bulbar function), use of upper extremities (cervical function), gait and turning in bed (lumbar function), and breathing (respiratory function). Total scores range from 0 (most impaired) to 48 (normal ability).

Time frame: Inclusion, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15 and Month 18

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants irrespective of study medication administration and eligibility status. Number analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluated for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OlesoximeAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 138.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.46
OlesoximeAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 932.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.72
OlesoximeAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 336.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.29
OlesoximeAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 1230.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.34
OlesoximeAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 237.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.64
OlesoximeAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 1528.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.56
OlesoximeAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 634.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.11
OlesoximeAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 1827.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.38
OlesoximeAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Inclusion39.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.78
Placebo ComparatorAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 1826.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.13
Placebo ComparatorAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Inclusion38.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.25
Placebo ComparatorAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 137.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.59
Placebo ComparatorAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 236.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.02
Placebo ComparatorAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 335.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.62
Placebo ComparatorAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 633.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.62
Placebo ComparatorAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 930.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
Placebo ComparatorAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 1228.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.47
Placebo ComparatorAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R)Month 1527.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.92
Secondary

Global Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle Groups

MMT score involved the examination of 30 items. These 30 items are scored from 0 (no trace of contraction) to 5 (normal power at first try). The global score is the sum of the item scores and can range from 0 to 150. Higher score indicates some power.

Time frame: Inclusion, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15 and Month 18

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants irrespective of study medication administration and eligibility status. Number analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluated for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OlesoximeGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 6117 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
OlesoximeGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 12106 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.7
OlesoximeGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 3121 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
OlesoximeGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 15101 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
OlesoximeGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 9112 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.1
OlesoximeGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 1895.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.7
OlesoximeGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsInclusion128 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Placebo ComparatorGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 1891.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.7
Placebo ComparatorGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsInclusion126 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Placebo ComparatorGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 3120 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Placebo ComparatorGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 6114 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
Placebo ComparatorGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 9109 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.1
Placebo ComparatorGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 12103 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.6
Placebo ComparatorGlobal Score of Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of 34 Muscle GroupsMonth 1599.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.2
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Global ALS FRS-R Score of <30 or Death

Percentage of participants with a global ALS FRS-R score of \< 30 or death was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method in the ITT, with a two-tailed log-rank, both stratified by site of onset (bulbar or spinal) and non-stratified. The ALSFRS-R is an ordinal rating scale (0 through 4) used to determine the ALS participant's self assessment of their ability and need for assistance in 12 activities or functions. This is a validated scale, both in person and by phone, which provides a total score from four sub-scores which assess speech and swallowing, (bulbar function), use of upper extremities (cervical function), gait and turning in bed (lumbar function), and breathing (respiratory function). Total scores range from 0 (most impaired) to 48 (normal ability).

Time frame: Month 18 (548 days)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants irrespective of study medication administration and eligibility status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OlesoximePercentage of Participants With a Global ALS FRS-R Score of <30 or Death28.2 percentage of participants
Placebo ComparatorPercentage of Participants With a Global ALS FRS-R Score of <30 or Death24.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.21Stratified Log-Rank Test
p-value: 0.2Non-stratified Log-Rank Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Failure Over 18 Months

Time to failure was defined as the time from randomization to the time of the first event to consider (Tracheostomy, invasive ventilation \[IV\] or non invasive ventilation \[NIV\])

Time frame: From randomization to the time of the first event to consider at 18 months (548 days)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants irrespective of study medication administration and eligibility status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OlesoximePercentage of Participants With Failure Over 18 Months67.1 percentage of participants
Placebo ComparatorPercentage of Participants With Failure Over 18 Months65.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.83Stratified Log-Rank Test
p-value: 0.73Non-stratified Log-Rank Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With SVC Percent Predicted <70% or Had Died Over 18 Months

Time frame: Month 18 (548 days)

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants irrespective of study medication administration and eligibility status. Number analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluated for specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OlesoximePercentage of Participants With SVC Percent Predicted <70% or Had Died Over 18 Months28.9 percentage of participants
Placebo ComparatorPercentage of Participants With SVC Percent Predicted <70% or Had Died Over 18 Months31.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.56Stratified Log-Rank Test
Secondary

Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent Predicted

SVC as a percent of the predicted value was evaluated and reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Inclusion, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15 and Month 18

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants irrespective of study medication administration and eligibility status. Number analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluated at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OlesoximeSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedBaseline93.1 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 14.6
OlesoximeSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 189.7 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 17.8
OlesoximeSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 384.8 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 20.4
OlesoximeSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 680.7 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 22.9
OlesoximeSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 977.9 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 24.3
OlesoximeSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 1274.5 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 25.4
OlesoximeSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 1570.5 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 28.8
OlesoximeSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 1869.0 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 27.6
Placebo ComparatorSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 1867.1 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 25.5
Placebo ComparatorSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedBaseline93.1 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 15.4
Placebo ComparatorSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 975.5 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 24.7
Placebo ComparatorSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 189.7 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 17.6
Placebo ComparatorSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 1571.4 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 27.1
Placebo ComparatorSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 385.7 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 19.7
Placebo ComparatorSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 1271.3 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 29
Placebo ComparatorSlow Vital Capacity (SVC) Percent PredictedMonth 680.5 percentage (%)Standard Deviation 22.5
Secondary

The Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life Scale

The single-item McGill quality of life scale evaluated the following question Considering all parts of my life - physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and financial - over the past two (2) days, the quality of my life has been…as a score of 1 to 10 on a visual analog scale where 0 is very bad and 10 is excellent.

Time frame: Inclusion, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15 and Month 18

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants irrespective of study medication administration and eligibility status. Number analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluated for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OlesoximeThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleInclusion6.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
OlesoximeThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 16.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
OlesoximeThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 35.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
OlesoximeThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 65.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
OlesoximeThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 95.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
OlesoximeThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 124.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
OlesoximeThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 154.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
OlesoximeThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 184.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Placebo ComparatorThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 185.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Placebo ComparatorThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleInclusion6.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Placebo ComparatorThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 95.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Placebo ComparatorThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 16.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Placebo ComparatorThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 154.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Placebo ComparatorThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 35.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Placebo ComparatorThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 125.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
Placebo ComparatorThe Single-Item Mc Gill Quality of Life ScaleMonth 65.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026