Renal Transplant Rejection
Conditions
Keywords
Sirolimus, Rapamune, Immunosuppression, Renal allograft function, Lymphocytes function
Brief summary
This study is being done to investigate the impact of changing immunosuppressive medications from tacrolimus (Prograf®) to sirolimus (Rapamune®) between 6 and 24 months post transplant. The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate whether the use of mycophenolate mofetil(MMF)/Cellcept® and tacrolimus(TAC)/Prograf® (Group 1) or mycophenolate mofetil(MMF)/Cellcept® and sirolimus/Rapamune® (Group 2) impacts the incidence of acute cellular rejection in post kidney transplant patients. This study will examine whether switching from tacrolimus to sirolimus will better preserve long-term kidney function.
Detailed description
For this research study, between 6 and 24 Months post-transplant, we plan to prospectively randomize 2:1 renal transplant patients to either: * Substitute tacrolimus (TAC) with sirolimus and continue mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or * Continue with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) A total of 400 patients are expected to be screened for the randomization. We expect to randomize 275 renal transplant patients into this protocol (275 donors to be recruited). The following data will be collected at the time of randomization: Recipient demographics: (i) age at transplantation, (ii) sex, and (iii) race. Clinical history: (i) causes of end-stage renal disease, and (ii) past medical history. Transplant related information: (i) donor age, (ii) cadaveric versus living kidney transplant, (iii) histocompatibility and cross match data, (iv) viral serology, (v) history of acute rejection and delayed graft function, (vi) use of induction therapy and immunosuppressants, (vii) use of ACEI and/or ARB, and (viii) level of renal allograft function-estimated GFR (e-GFR(12) using MDRD formula, proteinuria. Peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained from renal transplant recipients for baseline (prior to randomization) lymphocytes functional activity and characterization of lymphocytes subpopulations by flow cytometry analysis. Peripheral donor leukocytes (from living donor patients) will also be obtained at the time of randomization. These donor leukocytes will be used as stimulator cells to study the functional activity of the recipient's lymphocytes function. The recipients assigned to continue with tacrolimus and MMF will be routinely followed at the outpatient Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC) with monthly labs. In addition to labs at baseline pre-randomization, 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained to study lymphocytes functional activity and to characterize lymphocytes subpopulations by flow cytometry analysis. Post randomization: The recipients assigned to switch from tacrolimus to sirolimus and continue with MMF will be routinely followed at the CTC with monthly labs. During the period of conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus, weekly labs will be obtained to monitor renal function and bone marrow function. In addition to labs at baseline pre-randomization, 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained to study lymphocytes functional activity to characterize lymphocytes subpopulations by flow cytometry analysis. Urine will be collected to assess tubular toxicity by evaluating urinary biomarkers. Both groups of patients will be followed for 2 years post-randomization. In addition to monitoring renal allograft function, we will evaluate the incidence of acute rejection, patient and graft survival, impact of CI conversion on the lipid profile, incidence of hypertension, malignancies, opportunistic infections, and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (DM). For those willing to undergo an optional kidney biopsy, one will be performed at the end of the second year in order to evaluate renal allograft pathology and renal allograft tissue gene expression profiles of the two groups. With the peripheral leukocytes obtained at baseline prior to randomization and at 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, we will investigate possible modifications of lymphocytes function and the lymphocytes subpopulations that might have occurred as a consequence of the switch from tacrolimus to sirolimus. Obtaining renal allograft tissue samples at 24 months post randomization can have potential important ramifications to help explain the mechanisms of fibrosis and tubular atrophy typically associated with CI and the role of CI elimination with the substitution of sirolimus (SRL). All data will then be analyzed comparing gene expression profiles of peripheral blood (Pax gene tubes are routinely collected at the different time points as part of the original study). Based on power analysis, we will perform 24 months post randomization biopsies in 70% of the total subjects enrolled in the study (approximately 46 subjects from the tacrolimus/MMF group and approximately 93 subjects from the sirolimus/MMF group). We plan to obtain renal allograft biopsies at 24 Months for those that consent for this additional biopsy. This will be compared to the standard of care 12 months post-transplant biopsy to allow us to address the effect of immunosuppressive modifications on renal allograft pathology at 24 months post randomization. Renal allograft biopsies will also be stored in RNA later to further extend our knowledge on the effect of CI free immunosuppression on gene expression profiles.
Interventions
Sirolimus will initially be given at a dose of 2-4 mg orally (PO) daily. The dose will be modified to achieve 24 hours trough concentrations of 6-10 ng/ml by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. This medication will be given in an open label fashion. The first dose of sirolimus will be given at the time of randomization to those patients assigned to have tacrolimus switched to sirolimus.
Age at transplant, sex, race, cause of end-stage renal disease, medical history, donor age, cadaveric vs. living kidney transplant, histocompatibility/cross match data, viral serology, history of acute rejection and delayed graft function, use of induction therapy and immunosuppressants, use of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) and/or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) level of renal allograft function-estimated GFR (e-GFR(12) using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, proteinuria.
Subjects maintaining standard of care drug treatment of TAC and MMF will have monthly labs in addition to the baseline pre-randomization labs, at 6, 12, and 24 Months post-randomization. Peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained.
This group will have monthly labs taken but will also have weekly labs during the period of conversion to monitor renal function and bone marrow function. In addition to the baseline pre-randomization labs, and labs collected at 6, 12, and 24 Months post-randomization, peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained.
Peripheral blood leukocytes from living donors obtained at the time of randomization. These donor leukocytes will be used as stimulator cells to study the functional activity of the recipient's lymphocytes function.
Donor age, cadaveric vs. living donor, and histocompatibility and cross match to recipient
Kidney biopsy at 24 Months to compare to the standard of care biopsy taken at 12 Months. This information will help evaluate renal allograft pathology and renal allograft tissue gene expression profiles of the two groups. Renal allograft biopsies will be stored in RNA later (preservative) to further extend knowledge on the effect of calcineurin-inhibitors (CI) free immunosuppression on gene expression profiles.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Subjects should be adults ≥ 18- ≤ 70 years of age 2. Subjects can be either gender or of any ethnic background 3. Subjects should be single organ recipients (kidney only) 4. Subjects must be able to understand the protocol and provide informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
1. Subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to primary focal segmental glomerulonephritis (FSGS). 2. Inability to comply with study procedures 3. Inability to sign the informed consent 4. Subjects with a significant or active infection 5. Subjects who are pregnant or nursing females 6. Subjects with a history of severe hyperlipidemia not controlled with statins, patients with at total cholesterol of \> 400 mg/dl 7. Subjects with a platelet count \<100,000mm3 white blood cell (WBC)\< 2,000mm3 8. Subjects with severe proteinuria at the time of randomization (\>2gm/day) 9. Subjects with more then 2 episodes of acute cellular rejection post transplantation will be excluded from this study 10. An estimated GFR\<40 cc/min 11. A history of malignancy during the post-transplant period (other than treated basal cell cancer and/or squamous cell cancer) 12. Subjects, who, due to the existence of a surgical, medical or psychiatric condition, other than the current transplant, which in the opinion of the investigator, precludes enrollment into this trial 13. A history of albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) during the most recent previous 3 months prior to randomization
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection | Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported | The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate whether the use of mycophenolate mofetil/Cellcept ® and either tacrolimus/Prograf ® (Group #1) or mycophenolate mofetil/Cellcept ® and sirolimus/Rapamune® (Group #2) impacts the incidence of acute cellular rejection in post-kidney transplant patients. This study will examine whether switching from tacrolimus to sirolimus will better preserve long-term kidney function. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Renal Allograft Function Calculated With e-GFR and Proteinuria | Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported | Evaluate whether CI conversion (tacrolimus→sirolimus) contributes positively or negatively on the renal allograft function calculated with e-GFR and proteinuria |
| Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported | In addition to monitoring renal allograft function, evaluation will be conducted on the incidence of acute rejection, patient and graft survival, the impact of CI conversion on the lipid profile, the incidence of hypertension, malignancies, opportunistic infections and post-transplant DM (de novo diabetes mellitus). |
| Patient and Graft Survival | Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported | This study also reviews the impact of the immunosuppressive medications on patient and graft survival. |
| Percentage of Regulatory T Cells | Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported | Specifically we reported here the percentage of regulatory T cells that were present in the two groups at 24 months post randomization. With peripheral leukocytes taken at baseline (first visit) prior to randomization and at 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, researchers will also review possible modifications of lymphocytes function and of the lymphocytes subpopulations that might have occurred as a consequence of the switch from tacrolimus to sirolimus (randomization). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Donor participants were no part of our outcome analysis because their participation was only on the basis of providing blood for testing the immune system of the recipients. The analysis of the recipients was intention to treat therefore all recipient participants completed the study period
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Control Group 1 will continue immunosuppression medication per standard of care (SOC) at Northwestern by taking mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. | 90 |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group Group 2 will switch immunosuppression medication to taking mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus | 185 |
| Total | 275 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control | Transition to Sirolimus Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized Age in years | 39.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 | 38.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 | 38.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 |
| Coronary artery disease (CAD) | 10 Participants | 31 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Diabetis mellitus | 26 Participants | 69 Participants | 95 Participants |
| Donor type Cadaveric kidneys | 27 Participants | 55 Participants | 82 Participants |
| Donor type Living donors | 63 Participants | 130 Participants | 193 Participants |
| Elevated blood pressure | 76 Participants | 158 Participants | 234 Participants |
| HLA mismatch | 3.9 HLA antigens STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 | 3.61 HLA antigens STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82 | 3.8 HLA antigens STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8 |
| PRA >20% | 14 Participants | 24 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized AA | 24 Participants | 37 Participants | 61 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 17 Participants | 45 Participants | 62 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized other | 5 Participants | 20 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized white | 44 Participants | 83 Participants | 127 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 90 participants | 185 participants | 275 participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Sex female | 35 Participants | 79 Participants | 114 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Sex male | 55 Participants | 106 Participants | 161 Participants |
| Smoking | 9 Participants | 29 Participants | 38 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 3 / 90 | 10 / 185 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 58 / 90 | 135 / 185 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 42 / 90 | 117 / 185 |
Outcome results
Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection
The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate whether the use of mycophenolate mofetil/Cellcept ® and either tacrolimus/Prograf ® (Group #1) or mycophenolate mofetil/Cellcept ® and sirolimus/Rapamune® (Group #2) impacts the incidence of acute cellular rejection in post-kidney transplant patients. This study will examine whether switching from tacrolimus to sirolimus will better preserve long-term kidney function.
Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection | 7 Participants |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection | 31 Participants |
Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM
In addition to monitoring renal allograft function, evaluation will be conducted on the incidence of acute rejection, patient and graft survival, the impact of CI conversion on the lipid profile, the incidence of hypertension, malignancies, opportunistic infections and post-transplant DM (de novo diabetes mellitus).
Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Infections | 33 number of incidents |
| Control | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Malignancies | 4 number of incidents |
| Control | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Proteinura | 12 number of incidents |
| Control | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Hyperlipidemia | 9 number of incidents |
| Control | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | NODAT | 3 number of incidents |
| Control | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | BK viremia | 15 number of incidents |
| Control | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | BK nephropathy | 1 number of incidents |
| Control | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Neutropenia | 22 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Neutropenia | 35 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Infections | 83 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | NODAT | 2 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Malignancies | 9 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | BK nephropathy | 5 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Proteinura | 61 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | BK viremia | 28 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM | Hyperlipidemia | 19 number of incidents |
Patient and Graft Survival
This study also reviews the impact of the immunosuppressive medications on patient and graft survival.
Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Patient and Graft Survival | Kidney transplant loss | 4 number of incidents |
| Control | Patient and Graft Survival | Patient death | 3 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Patient and Graft Survival | Kidney transplant loss | 12 number of incidents |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Patient and Graft Survival | Patient death | 10 number of incidents |
Percentage of Regulatory T Cells
Specifically we reported here the percentage of regulatory T cells that were present in the two groups at 24 months post randomization. With peripheral leukocytes taken at baseline (first visit) prior to randomization and at 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, researchers will also review possible modifications of lymphocytes function and of the lymphocytes subpopulations that might have occurred as a consequence of the switch from tacrolimus to sirolimus (randomization).
Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Percentage of Regulatory T Cells | 75 % of Treg Cells | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Percentage of Regulatory T Cells | 98 % of Treg Cells | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
Renal Allograft Function Calculated With e-GFR and Proteinuria
Evaluate whether CI conversion (tacrolimus→sirolimus) contributes positively or negatively on the renal allograft function calculated with e-GFR and proteinuria
Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Renal Allograft Function Calculated With e-GFR and Proteinuria | 57.6 mL/min | Standard Deviation 20.4 |
| Transition to Sirolimus Group | Renal Allograft Function Calculated With e-GFR and Proteinuria | 58.4 mL/min | Standard Deviation 25.2 |