Skip to content

Randomized Conversion of Calcineurin-Inhibitors in Renal Allograft Recipients

Randomized Conversion of Calcineurin-Inhibitors(Tacrolimus to Sirolimus),6-24 Months Post Transplant Prednisone-Free Immunosuppression Regimen: Impact of Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection,Renal Allograft Function & Lymphocytes Function

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00866879
Enrollment
275
Registered
2009-03-23
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2019-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Transplant Rejection

Keywords

Sirolimus, Rapamune, Immunosuppression, Renal allograft function, Lymphocytes function

Brief summary

This study is being done to investigate the impact of changing immunosuppressive medications from tacrolimus (Prograf®) to sirolimus (Rapamune®) between 6 and 24 months post transplant. The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate whether the use of mycophenolate mofetil(MMF)/Cellcept® and tacrolimus(TAC)/Prograf® (Group 1) or mycophenolate mofetil(MMF)/Cellcept® and sirolimus/Rapamune® (Group 2) impacts the incidence of acute cellular rejection in post kidney transplant patients. This study will examine whether switching from tacrolimus to sirolimus will better preserve long-term kidney function.

Detailed description

For this research study, between 6 and 24 Months post-transplant, we plan to prospectively randomize 2:1 renal transplant patients to either: * Substitute tacrolimus (TAC) with sirolimus and continue mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or * Continue with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) A total of 400 patients are expected to be screened for the randomization. We expect to randomize 275 renal transplant patients into this protocol (275 donors to be recruited). The following data will be collected at the time of randomization: Recipient demographics: (i) age at transplantation, (ii) sex, and (iii) race. Clinical history: (i) causes of end-stage renal disease, and (ii) past medical history. Transplant related information: (i) donor age, (ii) cadaveric versus living kidney transplant, (iii) histocompatibility and cross match data, (iv) viral serology, (v) history of acute rejection and delayed graft function, (vi) use of induction therapy and immunosuppressants, (vii) use of ACEI and/or ARB, and (viii) level of renal allograft function-estimated GFR (e-GFR(12) using MDRD formula, proteinuria. Peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained from renal transplant recipients for baseline (prior to randomization) lymphocytes functional activity and characterization of lymphocytes subpopulations by flow cytometry analysis. Peripheral donor leukocytes (from living donor patients) will also be obtained at the time of randomization. These donor leukocytes will be used as stimulator cells to study the functional activity of the recipient's lymphocytes function. The recipients assigned to continue with tacrolimus and MMF will be routinely followed at the outpatient Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC) with monthly labs. In addition to labs at baseline pre-randomization, 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained to study lymphocytes functional activity and to characterize lymphocytes subpopulations by flow cytometry analysis. Post randomization: The recipients assigned to switch from tacrolimus to sirolimus and continue with MMF will be routinely followed at the CTC with monthly labs. During the period of conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus, weekly labs will be obtained to monitor renal function and bone marrow function. In addition to labs at baseline pre-randomization, 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained to study lymphocytes functional activity to characterize lymphocytes subpopulations by flow cytometry analysis. Urine will be collected to assess tubular toxicity by evaluating urinary biomarkers. Both groups of patients will be followed for 2 years post-randomization. In addition to monitoring renal allograft function, we will evaluate the incidence of acute rejection, patient and graft survival, impact of CI conversion on the lipid profile, incidence of hypertension, malignancies, opportunistic infections, and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (DM). For those willing to undergo an optional kidney biopsy, one will be performed at the end of the second year in order to evaluate renal allograft pathology and renal allograft tissue gene expression profiles of the two groups. With the peripheral leukocytes obtained at baseline prior to randomization and at 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, we will investigate possible modifications of lymphocytes function and the lymphocytes subpopulations that might have occurred as a consequence of the switch from tacrolimus to sirolimus. Obtaining renal allograft tissue samples at 24 months post randomization can have potential important ramifications to help explain the mechanisms of fibrosis and tubular atrophy typically associated with CI and the role of CI elimination with the substitution of sirolimus (SRL). All data will then be analyzed comparing gene expression profiles of peripheral blood (Pax gene tubes are routinely collected at the different time points as part of the original study). Based on power analysis, we will perform 24 months post randomization biopsies in 70% of the total subjects enrolled in the study (approximately 46 subjects from the tacrolimus/MMF group and approximately 93 subjects from the sirolimus/MMF group). We plan to obtain renal allograft biopsies at 24 Months for those that consent for this additional biopsy. This will be compared to the standard of care 12 months post-transplant biopsy to allow us to address the effect of immunosuppressive modifications on renal allograft pathology at 24 months post randomization. Renal allograft biopsies will also be stored in RNA later to further extend our knowledge on the effect of CI free immunosuppression on gene expression profiles.

Interventions

DRUGSirolimus

Sirolimus will initially be given at a dose of 2-4 mg orally (PO) daily. The dose will be modified to achieve 24 hours trough concentrations of 6-10 ng/ml by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. This medication will be given in an open label fashion. The first dose of sirolimus will be given at the time of randomization to those patients assigned to have tacrolimus switched to sirolimus.

OTHERDemographic Data, Medical History, and Donor Data

Age at transplant, sex, race, cause of end-stage renal disease, medical history, donor age, cadaveric vs. living kidney transplant, histocompatibility/cross match data, viral serology, history of acute rejection and delayed graft function, use of induction therapy and immunosuppressants, use of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) and/or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) level of renal allograft function-estimated GFR (e-GFR(12) using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, proteinuria.

PROCEDUREBlood Draws for Control Group

Subjects maintaining standard of care drug treatment of TAC and MMF will have monthly labs in addition to the baseline pre-randomization labs, at 6, 12, and 24 Months post-randomization. Peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained.

PROCEDUREBlood Draws for Experimental Group

This group will have monthly labs taken but will also have weekly labs during the period of conversion to monitor renal function and bone marrow function. In addition to the baseline pre-randomization labs, and labs collected at 6, 12, and 24 Months post-randomization, peripheral blood leukocytes will be obtained.

PROCEDUREDonor Blood Draws

Peripheral blood leukocytes from living donors obtained at the time of randomization. These donor leukocytes will be used as stimulator cells to study the functional activity of the recipient's lymphocytes function.

OTHERDonor Information

Donor age, cadaveric vs. living donor, and histocompatibility and cross match to recipient

PROCEDUREKidney Biopsy

Kidney biopsy at 24 Months to compare to the standard of care biopsy taken at 12 Months. This information will help evaluate renal allograft pathology and renal allograft tissue gene expression profiles of the two groups. Renal allograft biopsies will be stored in RNA later (preservative) to further extend knowledge on the effect of calcineurin-inhibitors (CI) free immunosuppression on gene expression profiles.

Sponsors

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects should be adults ≥ 18- ≤ 70 years of age 2. Subjects can be either gender or of any ethnic background 3. Subjects should be single organ recipients (kidney only) 4. Subjects must be able to understand the protocol and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to primary focal segmental glomerulonephritis (FSGS). 2. Inability to comply with study procedures 3. Inability to sign the informed consent 4. Subjects with a significant or active infection 5. Subjects who are pregnant or nursing females 6. Subjects with a history of severe hyperlipidemia not controlled with statins, patients with at total cholesterol of \> 400 mg/dl 7. Subjects with a platelet count \<100,000mm3 white blood cell (WBC)\< 2,000mm3 8. Subjects with severe proteinuria at the time of randomization (\>2gm/day) 9. Subjects with more then 2 episodes of acute cellular rejection post transplantation will be excluded from this study 10. An estimated GFR\<40 cc/min 11. A history of malignancy during the post-transplant period (other than treated basal cell cancer and/or squamous cell cancer) 12. Subjects, who, due to the existence of a surgical, medical or psychiatric condition, other than the current transplant, which in the opinion of the investigator, precludes enrollment into this trial 13. A history of albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) during the most recent previous 3 months prior to randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Acute Cellular RejectionAssessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reportedThe primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate whether the use of mycophenolate mofetil/Cellcept ® and either tacrolimus/Prograf ® (Group #1) or mycophenolate mofetil/Cellcept ® and sirolimus/Rapamune® (Group #2) impacts the incidence of acute cellular rejection in post-kidney transplant patients. This study will examine whether switching from tacrolimus to sirolimus will better preserve long-term kidney function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Renal Allograft Function Calculated With e-GFR and ProteinuriaAssessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reportedEvaluate whether CI conversion (tacrolimus→sirolimus) contributes positively or negatively on the renal allograft function calculated with e-GFR and proteinuria
Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMAssessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reportedIn addition to monitoring renal allograft function, evaluation will be conducted on the incidence of acute rejection, patient and graft survival, the impact of CI conversion on the lipid profile, the incidence of hypertension, malignancies, opportunistic infections and post-transplant DM (de novo diabetes mellitus).
Patient and Graft SurvivalAssessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reportedThis study also reviews the impact of the immunosuppressive medications on patient and graft survival.
Percentage of Regulatory T CellsAssessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reportedSpecifically we reported here the percentage of regulatory T cells that were present in the two groups at 24 months post randomization. With peripheral leukocytes taken at baseline (first visit) prior to randomization and at 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, researchers will also review possible modifications of lymphocytes function and of the lymphocytes subpopulations that might have occurred as a consequence of the switch from tacrolimus to sirolimus (randomization).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Donor participants were no part of our outcome analysis because their participation was only on the basis of providing blood for testing the immune system of the recipients. The analysis of the recipients was intention to treat therefore all recipient participants completed the study period

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Group 1 will continue immunosuppression medication per standard of care (SOC) at Northwestern by taking mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus.
90
Transition to Sirolimus Group
Group 2 will switch immunosuppression medication to taking mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus
185
Total275

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTransition to Sirolimus GroupTotal
Age, Customized
Age in years
39.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
38.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Coronary artery disease (CAD)10 Participants31 Participants41 Participants
Diabetis mellitus26 Participants69 Participants95 Participants
Donor type
Cadaveric kidneys
27 Participants55 Participants82 Participants
Donor type
Living donors
63 Participants130 Participants193 Participants
Elevated blood pressure76 Participants158 Participants234 Participants
HLA mismatch3.9 HLA antigens
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
3.61 HLA antigens
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82
3.8 HLA antigens
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
PRA >20%14 Participants24 Participants38 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
AA
24 Participants37 Participants61 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
17 Participants45 Participants62 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
other
5 Participants20 Participants25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
white
44 Participants83 Participants127 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
90 participants185 participants275 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex female
35 Participants79 Participants114 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex male
55 Participants106 Participants161 Participants
Smoking9 Participants29 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 9010 / 185
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 90135 / 185
serious
Total, serious adverse events
42 / 90117 / 185

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection

The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate whether the use of mycophenolate mofetil/Cellcept ® and either tacrolimus/Prograf ® (Group #1) or mycophenolate mofetil/Cellcept ® and sirolimus/Rapamune® (Group #2) impacts the incidence of acute cellular rejection in post-kidney transplant patients. This study will examine whether switching from tacrolimus to sirolimus will better preserve long-term kidney function.

Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlIncidence of Acute Cellular Rejection7 Participants
Transition to Sirolimus GroupIncidence of Acute Cellular Rejection31 Participants
Secondary

Evaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DM

In addition to monitoring renal allograft function, evaluation will be conducted on the incidence of acute rejection, patient and graft survival, the impact of CI conversion on the lipid profile, the incidence of hypertension, malignancies, opportunistic infections and post-transplant DM (de novo diabetes mellitus).

Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ControlEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMInfections33 number of incidents
ControlEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMMalignancies4 number of incidents
ControlEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMProteinura12 number of incidents
ControlEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMHyperlipidemia9 number of incidents
ControlEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMNODAT3 number of incidents
ControlEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMBK viremia15 number of incidents
ControlEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMBK nephropathy1 number of incidents
ControlEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMNeutropenia22 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMNeutropenia35 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMInfections83 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMNODAT2 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMMalignancies9 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMBK nephropathy5 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMProteinura61 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMBK viremia28 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupEvaluate if CI Conversion Impacts on Lipid Profile, Incidence of Hypertension, Malignancies, and Opportunistic Infections and Post-transplant DMHyperlipidemia19 number of incidents
Secondary

Patient and Graft Survival

This study also reviews the impact of the immunosuppressive medications on patient and graft survival.

Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ControlPatient and Graft SurvivalKidney transplant loss4 number of incidents
ControlPatient and Graft SurvivalPatient death3 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupPatient and Graft SurvivalKidney transplant loss12 number of incidents
Transition to Sirolimus GroupPatient and Graft SurvivalPatient death10 number of incidents
Secondary

Percentage of Regulatory T Cells

Specifically we reported here the percentage of regulatory T cells that were present in the two groups at 24 months post randomization. With peripheral leukocytes taken at baseline (first visit) prior to randomization and at 6, 12 and 24 Months post-randomization, researchers will also review possible modifications of lymphocytes function and of the lymphocytes subpopulations that might have occurred as a consequence of the switch from tacrolimus to sirolimus (randomization).

Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlPercentage of Regulatory T Cells75 % of Treg CellsStandard Deviation 7.1
Transition to Sirolimus GroupPercentage of Regulatory T Cells98 % of Treg CellsStandard Deviation 10.8
Secondary

Renal Allograft Function Calculated With e-GFR and Proteinuria

Evaluate whether CI conversion (tacrolimus→sirolimus) contributes positively or negatively on the renal allograft function calculated with e-GFR and proteinuria

Time frame: Assessed at 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months, months 24 reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlRenal Allograft Function Calculated With e-GFR and Proteinuria57.6 mL/minStandard Deviation 20.4
Transition to Sirolimus GroupRenal Allograft Function Calculated With e-GFR and Proteinuria58.4 mL/minStandard Deviation 25.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026