Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast (CC-10004) in the Treatment of Behçet Disease

A Phase 2, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study Followed by an Active-Treatment Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast(CC-10004) in the Treatment of Behçet Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00866359
Enrollment
111
Registered
2009-03-20
Start date
2009-08-01
Completion date
2012-05-01
Last updated
2020-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Behcet Syndrome

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether Apremilast is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with Behcet Disease.

Interventions

Treatment Phase Days 1-7: Titration from 10 mg BID apremilast tablets arm A (or matching placebo arm B) to 30 mg BID apremilast arm A(or matching placebo arm B) Day 8-84: Maintenance of 30 mg BID apremilast arm A (or matching placebo arm B) Dose reductions to 20 mg BID apremilast arm A (or matching placebo arm B) are permitted. Extension Phase All subjects will be given active drug Days 85-91: All placebo subjects from Treatment phase will be dose titrated from 10 mg BID apremilast tablets arm A to 30 mg BID Apremilast. Day 92-169: Maintenance of 30 mg BID apremilast arm A or dose reductions to 20 mg BID apremilast arm A (if not previously down titrated)

DRUGPlacebo

Treatment Phase Days 1-7: Titration from 10mg BID matching placebo (arm B) to 30mg BID placebo (arm B) Day 8-84: Maintenance of 30mg BID placebo (arm B). Dose reductions to 20 mg BID matching placebo (arm B) are permitted. Extension Phase All subjects will be given active drug Days 85-91: All placebo subjects from Treatment phase will be dose titrated from 10 mg BID apremilast tablets arm A to 30 mg BID Apremilast. Day 92-169: Maintenance of 30 mg BID apremilast or dose reductions to 20 mg BID apremilast (if not previously down titrated)

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Behçet Disease. At the time of diagnosis, subjects must meet the international study group criteria for Behçet Disease * Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have negative pregnancy tests and agree to use two forms of contraception throughout the study. * Males must use barrier contraception (latex condoms) when engaging in reproductive sexual activity with FCBP * Laboratory criteria: Hgb ≥ 9 g/dL, WBC count ≥ 3000 /microL and ≤14,000/microL, platelet count ≥ 100,000 /microL,, serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL (≤ 132.6 μmol/L), total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL, AST and ALT ≤ 1.5 X ULN * Two or more oral ulcers over the 28 day period before screening, with or without current treatment * Two or more oral ulcers at the time of randomization (Visit 2, Baseline)

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breast feeding * Any condition which places the subject at risk * Systemic fungal infection * History of TB infection within 3 years * History of recurrent bacterial infection * Mycobacterium TB as indicated by a positive PPD skin test * History of incompletely treated Mycobacterium tuberculosis * Clinically significant chest x-ray abnormality at screening. * Clinically significant ECG abnormality at screening * History of HIV infection * History of congenital or acquired immunodeficiency * Hepatitis B surface antigen positive or Hepatitis B core antibody positive at screening * Antibodies to Hepatitis C at screening * History of malignancy (except for treated basal-cell skin carcinomas \> 3 years prior to screening) * Any active major organ involvement of Behçet Disease * Use of concomitant immune modulating therapy or topical corticosteroids. * Use of ocular corticosteroids * Use of any investigational medication within 4 weeks prior to randomization or 5 PK/PD half-lives (whichever is longer)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Oral Ulcers at Day 85Day 85The number of oral ulcers were counted at each visit and at the end of the treatment period (starting point was at baseline).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseDay 1 to Day 85A flare was defined as the development of new manifestations of BD or worsening of existing disease, meeting the following criteria: 1. Organ involvement: any major organ involvement (eg, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract); 2. Oral/genital ulcers: ≥ 100% increase in the number of oral or genital ulcers from Day 1 or a minimum increase of 3 in the number of oral or genital ulcers, whichever is greater; 3. Arthritis: ≥ 50% increase in the number of swollen joints, or a minimum increase of 3 swollen joints, whichever is greater; 4. Skin lesions (non-oral/genital ulcers): ≥ 50% increase in the total score of the Physician's Global Assessment of Skin Lesions, or a minimum increase of 2 in the total score of the Physician's Global Assessment of Skin Lesions, whichever is greater' 5. New onset or worsening of existing Behçet Disease-related inflammatory eye disease requiring initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (uveitis).
Pain of Genital Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 197Day 1 to Day 197A 100-mm VAS pain scale for genital ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity as Measured by BD Current Activity Form/Index Score on Day 197Day 1 to Day 197The Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index consists of three component scores, a participant's perception of disease activity, a clinician's overall perception of disease activity and a Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index Score. The score ranges from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates higher level of disease activity (worsening) and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Summary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseDay 1 to Day 197; maximum exposure was 25.1 weeksA Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) is as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment of any study drug, and within 28 days after the last dose of the last study drug. A treatment related toxicity was considered by the investigator to be not suspected or suspected. Severity grades according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) on a 1-5 scale: Grade 1= Mild AE, Grade 2= Moderate AE, Grade 3= Severe AE, Grade 4= Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5=Death related to AE.
Pain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 85Day 85A 100-mm VAS pain scale for oral ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.
Pain of Genital Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores at Day 85Baseline to Day 85A 100-mm VAS pain scale for genital ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Number of Oral Ulcers From Day 1 to 85Day 1 to Day 85Area under curve (AUC\^85) from Day 1 to Day 85 for the number of oral ulcers per day was determined using the trapezoidal rule and divided by the days between the date of the last observation and baseline. The AUC was determined using the LOCF approach to impute missing values.
Area Under the Curve for the Number of Genital Ulcers From Day 1 to 85Day 1 to Day 85Area under curve (AUC\^85) from Day 1 to Day 85 for the number of genital ulcers per day was not analyzed.
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Number of Oral Plus Genital Ulcers From Day 1 to 85Day 1 to Day 85Area under curve (AUC) from Day 1 to Day 85 (AUC\^85) for the number of oral plus genital ulcers per day was determined using the trapezoidal rule and divided by the days between the date of the last observation and baseline. The AUC was determined using the LOCF approach to impute missing values.
Sum of the Number Oral Ulcers, Genital Ulcers or Oral Plus Genital Ulcers at Day 85Day 85Sum of the number oral ulcers, genital ulcers or oral plus genital ulcers at Day 85
Percentage of Participants Who Were Oral Ulcer-free (Complete Response), or Whose Oral Ulcers Were Reduced by ≥ 50%, (Partial Response)Baseline and Day 85Comparison of the percentage of participants who were oral ulcer-free (complete response: free from active oral ulcers), or whose oral ulcers were reduced by ≥ 50%, (partial response) between the apremilast-treated and the placebo-treated groups. In this case, partial response also includes complete response.
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity as Measured by BD Current Activity Form/Index Score on Day 85Day 1 to Day 85 or to early termination visitThe Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index consists of three component scores, a participant's perception of disease activity, a clinician's overall perception of disease activity and a Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index Score. The score ranges from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates higher level of disease activity (worsening) and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseDay 1 to Day 85; maximum exposure to study drug was 13 weeks during treatment phaseA Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) was defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment of any study drug, and within 28 days after the last dose of the last study drug. A treatment related toxicity was considered by the investigator to be not suspected or suspected. Severity grades according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) on a 1-5 scale: Grade 1= Mild AE, Grade 2= Moderate AE, Grade 3= Severe AE, Grade 4= Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5=Death related to AE.
Number of Oral Ulcers at Day 169Day 169The number of oral ulcers were counted at Day 169 in reference to the participants' first day of active treatment (Day 1 or Day 85).
Pain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by VAS (VAS Score) at Day 169Day 169A 100-mm VAS pain scale for oral ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.
Pain of Genital Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 169Day 1 to Day 169A 100-mm VAS pain scale for genital ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.
Behçet's Disease (BD) Current Activity Index Form Score at Day 169Day 169The Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index consists of three component scores, a participant's perception of disease activity, a clinician's overall perception of disease activity and a Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index Score. The score ranges from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates higher level of disease activity (worsening) and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Number of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare That Were Not Present at Day 1Day 1 to Day 169A flare was defined as the development of new manifestations of BD or worsening of existing disease, meeting the following criteria: 1. Organ involvement: any major organ involvement (eg, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract); 2. Oral/genital ulcers: ≥ 100% increase in the number of oral or genital ulcers from Day 1 or a minimum increase of 3 in the number of oral or genital ulcers, whichever is greater; 3. Arthritis: ≥ 50% increase in the number of swollen joints, or a minimum increase of 3 swollen joints, whichever is greater; 4. Skin lesions (non-oral/genital ulcers): ≥ 50% increase in the total score of the Physician's Global Assessment of Skin Lesions, or a minimum increase of 2 in the total score of the Physician's Global Assessment of Skin Lesions, whichever is greater; 5. New onset or worsening of existing Behçet Disease-related inflammatory eye disease requiring initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (uveitis).
Number of Oral Ulcers at Day 197Day 197The number of oral ulcers were counted at each visit and at the end of the treatment period (starting point was at baseline).
Pain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by VAS (VAS Score) at Day 197Day 197A 100-mm VAS pain scale for oral ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response)Day 1 to Day 197The percentage of participants who were genital ulcer-free (complete response: free from active genital ulcers)
Percentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response) at Day 169Day 1 to Day 169The percentage of participants who were genital ulcer-free (complete response: free from active genital ulcers)
Percentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response) at Day 85Baseline to Day 85The percentage of participants who were genital ulcer-free (complete response: free from active genital ulcers)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 3 study sites in Turkey and 3 sites in the United States. The first participant enrolled was enrolled on October 23, 2009 and the last participant enrolled was enrolled on May 08, 2012.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive study drug (apremilast or placebo). Since the incidence and severity of Behçet's Disease differ between males and females, randomization was stratified by gender.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo (Oral) BID
Treatment Phase (Days 1 to 85): Participants administered identically matching placebo tablets BID in the 12-week placebo-controlled phase.
56
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BID
Treatment Phase (Days 1 to 85): Participants administered 30 mg Apremilast tablets BID during the 12-week placebo-controlled treatment phase.
55
Total111

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Extension Phase (Day 86 to 169)Adverse Event0013
Treatment Phase (Days 1 to 85)Adverse Event5400
Treatment Phase (Days 1 to 85)Lack of Efficacy3000
Treatment Phase (Days 1 to 85)Other1000
Treatment Phase (Days 1 to 85)Protocol Violation1100
Treatment Phase (Days 1 to 85)Withdrawal by Subject1000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo (Oral) BIDApremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDTotal
Age, Continuous34.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97
34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.11
34.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.05
Duration of Behçet's disease5.72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.084
4.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.982
5.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.143
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants39 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 5647 / 5582 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 562 / 556 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Oral Ulcers at Day 85

The number of oral ulcers were counted at each visit and at the end of the treatment period (starting point was at baseline).

Time frame: Day 85

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) = all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline visit). A Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was applied for participants terminated early. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Oral Ulcers at Day 852.0 ulcers/participantsStandard Error 0.28
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Oral Ulcers at Day 850.4 ulcers/participantsStandard Error 0.28
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.4, -0.9]ANCOVA
Secondary

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Number of Oral Plus Genital Ulcers From Day 1 to 85

Area under curve (AUC) from Day 1 to Day 85 (AUC\^85) for the number of oral plus genital ulcers per day was determined using the trapezoidal rule and divided by the days between the date of the last observation and baseline. The AUC was determined using the LOCF approach to impute missing values.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 85

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Number of Oral Plus Genital Ulcers From Day 1 to 85193.95 total AUC (#ulcers*days)Standard Deviation 161.492
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Number of Oral Plus Genital Ulcers From Day 1 to 8565.79 total AUC (#ulcers*days)Standard Deviation 108.037
Secondary

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Number of Oral Ulcers From Day 1 to 85

Area under curve (AUC\^85) from Day 1 to Day 85 for the number of oral ulcers per day was determined using the trapezoidal rule and divided by the days between the date of the last observation and baseline. The AUC was determined using the LOCF approach to impute missing values.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 85

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Number of Oral Ulcers From Day 1 to 85157.82 total AUC (#ulcers*days)Standard Error 12.89
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Number of Oral Ulcers From Day 1 to 8567.74 total AUC (#ulcers*days)Standard Error 13.267
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-125.32, -54.82]ANCOVA
Secondary

Area Under the Curve for the Number of Genital Ulcers From Day 1 to 85

Area under curve (AUC\^85) from Day 1 to Day 85 for the number of genital ulcers per day was not analyzed.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 85

Population: No population analyzed due to small number of participants with genital ulcers; not considered meaningful.

Secondary

Behçet's Disease (BD) Current Activity Index Form Score at Day 169

The Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index consists of three component scores, a participant's perception of disease activity, a clinician's overall perception of disease activity and a Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index Score. The score ranges from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates higher level of disease activity (worsening) and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Day 169

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDBehçet's Disease (BD) Current Activity Index Form Score at Day 1691.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDBehçet's Disease (BD) Current Activity Index Form Score at Day 1691.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity as Measured by BD Current Activity Form/Index Score on Day 197

The Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index consists of three component scores, a participant's perception of disease activity, a clinician's overall perception of disease activity and a Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index Score. The score ranges from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates higher level of disease activity (worsening) and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 197

Population: Includes participants who entered the Observational Follow-up Phase from either the Treatment Phase or the Extension Phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity as Measured by BD Current Activity Form/Index Score on Day 197-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity as Measured by BD Current Activity Form/Index Score on Day 197-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity as Measured by BD Current Activity Form/Index Score on Day 85

The Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index consists of three component scores, a participant's perception of disease activity, a clinician's overall perception of disease activity and a Behçet's Disease Current Activity Index Score. The score ranges from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates higher level of disease activity (worsening) and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 85 or to early termination visit

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity as Measured by BD Current Activity Form/Index Score on Day 85-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity as Measured by BD Current Activity Form/Index Score on Day 85-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-1.7, -0.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare During the Placebo Controlled Treatment Phase

A flare was defined as the development of new manifestations of BD or worsening of existing disease, meeting the following criteria: 1. Organ involvement: any major organ involvement (eg, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract); 2. Oral/genital ulcers: ≥ 100% increase in the number of oral or genital ulcers from Day 1 or a minimum increase of 3 in the number of oral or genital ulcers, whichever is greater; 3. Arthritis: ≥ 50% increase in the number of swollen joints, or a minimum increase of 3 swollen joints, whichever is greater; 4. Skin lesions (non-oral/genital ulcers): ≥ 50% increase in the total score of the Physician's Global Assessment of Skin Lesions, or a minimum increase of 2 in the total score of the Physician's Global Assessment of Skin Lesions, whichever is greater' 5. New onset or worsening of existing Behçet Disease-related inflammatory eye disease requiring initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (uveitis).

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 85

Population: Safety population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of Investigational Product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseParticipants who had disease flare27 participants
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseParticipants with new onset or worsening uveitis3 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseParticipants who had disease flare12 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseParticipants with new onset or worsening uveitis0 participants
Secondary

Number of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare That Were Not Present at Day 1

A flare was defined as the development of new manifestations of BD or worsening of existing disease, meeting the following criteria: 1. Organ involvement: any major organ involvement (eg, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract); 2. Oral/genital ulcers: ≥ 100% increase in the number of oral or genital ulcers from Day 1 or a minimum increase of 3 in the number of oral or genital ulcers, whichever is greater; 3. Arthritis: ≥ 50% increase in the number of swollen joints, or a minimum increase of 3 swollen joints, whichever is greater; 4. Skin lesions (non-oral/genital ulcers): ≥ 50% increase in the total score of the Physician's Global Assessment of Skin Lesions, or a minimum increase of 2 in the total score of the Physician's Global Assessment of Skin Lesions, whichever is greater; 5. New onset or worsening of existing Behçet Disease-related inflammatory eye disease requiring initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (uveitis).

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 169

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare That Were Not Present at Day 1Participants who experienced a disease flare15 participants
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare That Were Not Present at Day 1Participants with new onset or worsening uveitis1 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare That Were Not Present at Day 1Participants who experienced a disease flare19 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of New Manifestations of Behçet's Disease or Flare That Were Not Present at Day 1Participants with new onset or worsening uveitis2 participants
Secondary

Number of Oral Ulcers at Day 169

The number of oral ulcers were counted at Day 169 in reference to the participants' first day of active treatment (Day 1 or Day 85).

Time frame: Day 169

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Oral Ulcers at Day 1690.4 ulcers/participantStandard Deviation 1.31
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Oral Ulcers at Day 1690.6 ulcers/participantStandard Deviation 1.27
Secondary

Number of Oral Ulcers at Day 197

The number of oral ulcers were counted at each visit and at the end of the treatment period (starting point was at baseline).

Time frame: Day 197

Population: Includes participants who entered the Observational Follow-up Phase from either the Treatment Phase or the Extension Phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Oral Ulcers at Day 1971.6 ulcers/participantsStandard Deviation 1.78
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Oral Ulcers at Day 1971.7 ulcers/participantsStandard Deviation 2.06
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment Phase

A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) was defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment of any study drug, and within 28 days after the last dose of the last study drug. A treatment related toxicity was considered by the investigator to be not suspected or suspected. Severity grades according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) on a 1-5 scale: Grade 1= Mild AE, Grade 2= Moderate AE, Grade 3= Severe AE, Grade 4= Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5=Death related to AE.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 85; maximum exposure to study drug was 13 weeks during treatment phase

Population: Safety Population defined as all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of Investigational Product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny severe TEAE5 participants
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny serious drug related TEAE1 participants
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny TEAE leading to drug interruption0 participants
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny drug related TEAE24 participants
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny TEAE leading to drug withdrawal5 participants
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny serious TEAE3 participants
Placebo (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny TEAE50 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny serious drug related TEAE0 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny TEAE49 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny drug related TEAE30 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny severe TEAE5 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny serious TEAE2 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny TEAE leading to drug interruption1 participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDNumber of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo Controlled Treatment PhaseAny TEAE leading to drug withdrawal4 participants
Secondary

Pain of Genital Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 169

A 100-mm VAS pain scale for genital ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 169

Population: Not analyzed due to low numbers of genital ulcers; not considered meaningful.

Secondary

Pain of Genital Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 197

A 100-mm VAS pain scale for genital ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 197

Population: Not analyzed due to low numbers of genital ulcers; not considered meaningful.

Secondary

Pain of Genital Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores at Day 85

A 100-mm VAS pain scale for genital ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 85

Population: Not analyzed due to low numbers of genital ulcers; not considered meaningful.

Secondary

Pain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by VAS (VAS Score) at Day 169

A 100-mm VAS pain scale for oral ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.

Time frame: Day 169

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDPain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by VAS (VAS Score) at Day 1699.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.13
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDPain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by VAS (VAS Score) at Day 1699.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.33
Secondary

Pain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by VAS (VAS Score) at Day 197

A 100-mm VAS pain scale for oral ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.

Time frame: Day 197

Population: Includes participants who entered the Observational Follow-up Phase from either the Treatment Phase or the Extension Phase.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDPain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by VAS (VAS Score) at Day 19721.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.26
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDPain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by VAS (VAS Score) at Day 19727.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.71
Secondary

Pain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 85

A 100-mm VAS pain scale for oral ulcers was completed by the participant at timepoints specified in the protocol. Each 100-mm VAS was presented to the participant on a single sheet of bond paper. The participant was asked to draw a single line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented the severity of their pain during the previous week, with 0 mm (the left-hand end of the scale) representing no pain and 100 mm (the right-hand end of the scale) representing the worst pain imaginable. The distance of the perpendicular line from the left-hand end of the scale was measured by ruler and recorded. When responding to a VAS item, participants specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.

Time frame: Day 85

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDPain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 8536.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.23
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDPain of Oral Ulcers as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 859.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-35.5, -18]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Oral Ulcer-free (Complete Response), or Whose Oral Ulcers Were Reduced by ≥ 50%, (Partial Response)

Comparison of the percentage of participants who were oral ulcer-free (complete response: free from active oral ulcers), or whose oral ulcers were reduced by ≥ 50%, (partial response) between the apremilast-treated and the placebo-treated groups. In this case, partial response also includes complete response.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 85

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Oral Ulcer-free (Complete Response), or Whose Oral Ulcers Were Reduced by ≥ 50%, (Partial Response)Complete Response28.6 percentage of participants
Placebo (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Oral Ulcer-free (Complete Response), or Whose Oral Ulcers Were Reduced by ≥ 50%, (Partial Response)Partial Response50.0 percentage of participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Oral Ulcer-free (Complete Response), or Whose Oral Ulcers Were Reduced by ≥ 50%, (Partial Response)Complete Response70.9 percentage of participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Oral Ulcer-free (Complete Response), or Whose Oral Ulcers Were Reduced by ≥ 50%, (Partial Response)Partial Response89.1 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [23.6, 54.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Summary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension Phase

A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) is as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment of any study drug, and within 28 days after the last dose of the last study drug. A treatment related toxicity was considered by the investigator to be not suspected or suspected. Severity grades according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) on a 1-5 scale: Grade 1= Mild AE, Grade 2= Moderate AE, Grade 3= Severe AE, Grade 4= Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5=Death related to AE.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 197; maximum exposure was 25.1 weeks

Population: Safety analyses for the apremilast-exposure period was based on the apremilast participants as treated (AAT) Population, and included those who were randomized (at the randomization visit) or switched (at the Day 85 visit) to apremilast 30 mg BID, and received at least one dose of apremilast after the initial randomization or switch to 30 mg BID.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny drug related TEAE20 particpants
Placebo (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny serious TEAE1 particpants
Placebo (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny serious drug related TEAE0 particpants
Placebo (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseTEAE leading to drug interuption0 particpants
Placebo (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny severe TEAE1 particpants
Placebo (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseTEAE leading to drug withdrawal1 particpants
Placebo (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny TEAE39 particpants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseTEAE leading to drug withdrawal7 particpants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny TEAE50 particpants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny serious drug related TEAE1 particpants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny drug related TEAE33 particpants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny severe TEAE11 particpants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseAny serious TEAE5 particpants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDSummary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Active Treatment-Extension PhaseTEAE leading to drug interuption1 particpants
Secondary

Sum of the Number Oral Ulcers, Genital Ulcers or Oral Plus Genital Ulcers at Day 85

Sum of the number oral ulcers, genital ulcers or oral plus genital ulcers at Day 85

Time frame: Day 85

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with at least one oral ulcer evaluation (including the baseline evaluation). A LOCF approach was applied for participants terminated early from the study. If a participant had no post-baseline oral ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (Oral) BIDSum of the Number Oral Ulcers, Genital Ulcers or Oral Plus Genital Ulcers at Day 852.3 Ulcers/participantsStandard Error 0.35
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDSum of the Number Oral Ulcers, Genital Ulcers or Oral Plus Genital Ulcers at Day 850.6 Ulcers/participantsStandard Error 0.36
p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-2.7, -0.8]ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response)

The percentage of participants who were genital ulcer-free (complete response: free from active genital ulcers)

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 197

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) = all randomized participants with at least one genital ulcer at baseline. A Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was applied for participants terminated early. If a participant had no post-baseline genital ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response)100 percentage of participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response)100 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response) at Day 169

The percentage of participants who were genital ulcer-free (complete response: free from active genital ulcers)

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 169

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) = all randomized participants with at least one genital ulcer at baseline visit. A Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was applied for participants terminated early. If a participant had no post-baseline genital ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response) at Day 16966.7 percentage of participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response) at Day 169100 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response) at Day 85

The percentage of participants who were genital ulcer-free (complete response: free from active genital ulcers)

Time frame: Baseline to Day 85

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) = all randomized participants with at least one genital ulcer at baseline. A Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was applied for participants terminated early. If a participant had no post-baseline genital ulcer assessment, the baseline value was carried forward for calculation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response) at Day 8550 percentage of participants
Apremilast 30mg (Oral) BIDPercentage of Participants Who Were Genital Ulcer-free (Complete Response) at Day 85100 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026